scholarly journals Positive- and negative-acting regulatory elements contribute to the tissue-specific expression of INNER NO OUTER, a YABBY-type transcription factor gene in Arabidopsis

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marissa K Simon ◽  
Luis A Williams ◽  
Kristina Brady-Passerini ◽  
Ryan H Brown ◽  
Charles S Gasser
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Transcription Factor Gene ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Factor Gene ◽  
Tissue Specific Expression

scholarly journals Human acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase 2 gene expression in intestinal Caco-2 cells and in hepatocellular carcinoma

2006 ◽  
Vol 394 (3) ◽  
pp. 617-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bao-Liang Song ◽  
Can-Hua Wang ◽  
Xiao-Min Yao ◽  
Li Yang ◽  
Wen-Jing Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Molecular Mechanism ◽  
Luciferase Reporter ◽  
Hepatoma Cell Line ◽  
Cis Elements ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Tissue Specific Expression ◽  
Cdx2 Expression

Humans express two ACAT (acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase) genes, ACAT1 and ACAT2. ACAT1 is ubiquitously expressed, whereas ACAT2 is primarily expressed in intestinal mucosa and plays an important role in intestinal cholesterol absorption. To investigate the molecular mechanism(s) responsible for the tissue-specific expression of ACAT2, we identified five cis-elements within the human ACAT2 promoter, four for the intestinal-specific transcription factor CDX2 (caudal type homeobox transcription factor 2), and one for the transcription factor HNF1α (hepatocyte nuclear factor 1α). Results of luciferase reporter and electrophoretic mobility shift assays show that CDX2 and HNF1α exert a synergistic effect, enhancing the ACAT2 promoter activity through binding to these cis-elements. In undifferentiated Caco-2 cells, the ACAT2 expression is increased when exogenous CDX2 and/or HNF1α are expressed by co-transfection. In differentiated Caco-2 cells, the ACAT2 expression significantly decreases when the endogenous CDX2 or HNF1α expression is suppressed by using RNAi (RNA interference) technology. The expression levels of CDX2, HNF1α, and ACAT2 are all greatly increased when the Caco-2 cells differentiate to become intestinal-like cells. These results provide a molecular mechanism for the tissue-specific expression of ACAT2 in intestine. In normal adult human liver, CDX2 expression is not detectable and the ACAT2 expression is very low. In the hepatoma cell line HepG2 the CDX2 expression is elevated, accounting for its elevated ACAT2 expression. A high percentage (seven of fourteen) of liver samples from patients affected with hepatocellular carcinoma exhibited elevated ACAT2 expression. Thus, the elevated ACAT2 expression may serve as a new biomarker for certain form(s) of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Natural and synthetic DNA elements with the CArG motif differ in expression and protein-binding properties

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 6296-6305
Author(s):  
I M Santoro ◽  
K Walsh
Keyword(s):  
Constitutive Expression ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Binding Properties ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Left Half ◽  
Tissue Specific Expression ◽  
Dna Elements ◽  
The Right ◽  
Natural And Synthetic

DNA elements with the CC(A/T)6GG, or CArG, motif occur in promoters that are under different regulatory controls. CArG elements from the skeletal actin, c-fos, and myogenin genes were tested for their abilities to confer tissue-specific expression on reporter genes when the individual elements were situated immediately upstream from a TATA element. The c-fos CArG element, also referred to as the serum response element (SRE), conferred basal, constitutive expression on the test promoter. The CArG motif from the myogenin gene was inactive. The skeletal actin CArG motif functioned as a muscle regulatory element (MRE) in that basal expression was detected only in muscle cultures. Muscle-specific expression from the 28-bp MRE and the 2.3-kb skeletal actin promoter was trans repressed by the Fos and Jun proteins. The expression and factor-binding properties of a series of synthetic CArG elements were analyzed. Muscle-specific expression was conferred by perfect 28-bp palindromes on the left and right halves of the skeletal actin MRE. Chimeric elements of the skeletal actin MRE and the c-fos SRE differed in their expression properties. Muscle-specific expression was observed when the left half of the MRE was fused to the right half of the SRE. Constitutive expression was conferred by a chimera with the right half of the MRE fused to the left half of the SRE and by chimeras which exchanged the central CC(A/T)6GG sequences. At least three distinct proteins specifically bound to these CArG elements. The natural and synthetic CArG elements differed in their affinities for these proteins; however, muscle-specific expression could not be attributed to differences in the binding of a single protein. Furthermore, the MRE did not bind MyoD or the myogenin-E12 heterodimer, indicating that muscle-specific expression from this element does not involve a direct interaction with these helix-loop-helix proteins. These data demonstrate that the conserved CArG motifs form the core of a family of functionally different DNA regulatory elements that may contribute to the tissue-specific expression properties of their cognate promoters.

Characterization of the lung Krüppel-like transcription factor gene and upstream regulatory elements

Gene ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 236 (1) ◽  
pp. 185-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J Schrick ◽  
Michael J Hughes ◽  
Kathleen P Anderson ◽  
Michelle L Croyle ◽  
Jerry B Lingrel
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Transcription Factor Gene ◽  
Factor Gene

scholarly journals A novel strategy to produce sweeter tomato fruits with high sugar contents by fruit-specific expression of a single bZIP transcription factor gene

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 1116-1126 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. H. M. Sagor ◽  
Thomas Berberich ◽  
Shun Tanaka ◽  
Manabu Nishiyama ◽  
Yoshinori Kanayama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Bzip Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factor Gene ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Tomato Fruits ◽  
Factor Gene ◽  
High Sugar ◽  
Novel Strategy

scholarly journals Hypermethylation of human DNA: Fine-tuning transcription associated with development

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl Baribault ◽  
Kenneth C. Ehrlich ◽  
V. K. Chaithanya Ponnaluri ◽  
Sriharsa Pradhan ◽  
Michelle Lacey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
Ctcf Binding ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Dna Hypermethylation ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Lncrna Gene ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Tissue Specific Expression

AbstractTissue-specific gene transcription can be affected by DNA methylation in ways that are difficult to discern from studies focused on genome-wide analyses of differentially methylated regions (DMRs). We studied 95 genes in detail using available epigenetic and transcription databases to detect and elucidate less obvious associations between development-linked hypermethylated DMRs in myoblasts (Mb) and cell-and tissue-specific expression. Many of these genes encode developmental transcription factors and display DNA hypermethylation also in skeletal muscle (SkM) and a few heterologous samples (e.g., aorta, mammary epithelial cells, or brain) among the 38 types of human cell cultures or tissues examined. Most of the DMRs overlapped transcription regulatory elements, including canonical, alternative, or cryptic promoters; enhancers; CTCF binding sites; and long-noncoding RNA (lncRNA) gene regions. Among the prominent relationships between DMRs and expression was promoter-region hypermethylation accompanying repression in Mb but not in many other repressed samples (26 genes). Another surprising relationship was down-modulated (but not silenced) expression in Mb associated with DNA hypermethylation at cryptic enhancers in Mb although such methylation was absent in both non-expressing samples and highly expressing samples (24 genes). The tissue-specificity of DNA hypermethylation can be explained for many of the genes by their roles in prenatal development or by the tissue-specific expression of neighboring genes. Besides elucidating developmental epigenetics, our study provides insights into the roles of abnormal DNA methylation in disease, e.g., cancer, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and congenital heart malformations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document