scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of long-term esomeprazole 20 mg in Japanese patients with a history of peptic ulcer receiving daily non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Sugano ◽  
Yoshikazu Kinoshita ◽  
Hiroto Miwa ◽  
Tsutomu Takeuchi
1994 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 144-153
Author(s):  
Brian L. Erstad ◽  
Robert J. Lipsy

There are a substantial number of adverse reactions attributable to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy, particularly of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The stomach is most commonly affected, although injury may occur from esophagus to colon. The incidence of developing serious GI toxicity seems to be three times as great in users compared with nonusers of NSAIDs. Age greater than 60 years, history of GI problems, previous corticosteroid use, and recency of NSAID use seem to increase the risk of toxicity. Short-term studies have found differences in ulceration or bleeding caused by various NSAIDs. However, there are insufficient long-term clinical trials involving adequate numbers of patients to demonstrate substantial advantages for any particular NSAID based on its toxicity profile. Prostaglandin inhibition seems to be one mechanism responsible for the GI toxicity of NSAIDs, but it is probably not the only mechanism. When serious GI bleeding occurs, the NSAID use must be stopped, although omeprazole and misoprostol have been used successfully to treat gastroduodenal ulcerations in patients while continuing NSAID therapy. Misoprostol and possibly omeprazole have effectively prevented GI ulceration associated with NSAID therapy, but questions remain regarding patient selection, length of therapy, and their utility in preventing serious GI bleeding. At this time, routine prophylaxis for patients receiving long-term NSAID therapy cannot be recommended.


Digestion ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomohiro Nagasue ◽  
Shotaro Nakamura ◽  
Shuji Kochi ◽  
Koichi Kurahara ◽  
Hiroki Yaita ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. e230735
Author(s):  
Ryan Pereira ◽  
Kellee Slater

Small bowel diaphragm disease (SBDD) is characterised by circumferential lesions of short length (<5 mm), causing intrinsic stenosis of the small bowel lumen. A 63-year-old women with a history of long-term non-steroidal anti-inflammatory use, presented with a 12-month history of intermittent episodes of colicky abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting. Her only past surgery was a laparoscopic hysterectomy. Abdominal CT demonstrated an area of thickening in the mid small bowel, however a diagnostic laparoscopy failed to demonstrate adhesions or any external abnormality. A capsule endoscope did not progress beyond the mid small bowel at the site of a suspected diaphragm. The patient underwent a laparotomy and using the retained capsule as a marker, the area of bowel affected by SBDD was identified. With an ageing population and the widespread use of non-steroidalanti-inflammatory drugs, general surgeons may see an increase in the incidence of SBDD.


1990 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 91-94
Author(s):  
MJS Langman

A causal relationship is now firmly established between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAlD) use and the occurrence of peptic ulcer complications. In the United Kingdom, rising NSAID use has been matched by rises in ulcer mortality and perforation rates, particularly in older women. It is not likely, however, that drug use accounts for the entire increase. The reasons why some people develop ulcer complications and others do not are poorly understood. It is plausible to propose that other factors, such as history of ulcer or indigestion, current smoking, and alcohol consumption, might raise this risk; however, supportive evidence is lacking.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document