scholarly journals Total hip arthroplasty: leg length inequality impairs functional outcomes and patient satisfaction

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Röder ◽  
Raphael Vogel ◽  
Lukas Burri ◽  
Daniel Dietrich ◽  
Lukas P Staub
2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony B. McWilliams ◽  
Andrew J. Grainger ◽  
Philip J. O'Connor ◽  
Anthony C. Redmond ◽  
Todd D. Stewart ◽  
...  

Orthopedics ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne M Goldstein ◽  
Alexander Gordon ◽  
Jill J Branson

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-30
Author(s):  
Nicholas D. Clement ◽  
Paul Gaston ◽  
Allison Bell ◽  
Philip Simpson ◽  
Gavin Macpherson ◽  
...  

Aims The primary aim of this study was to compare the hip-specific functional outcome of robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) with manual total hip arthroplasty (mTHA) in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Secondary aims were to compare general health improvement, patient satisfaction, and radiological component position and restoration of leg length between rTHA and mTHA. Methods A total of 40 patients undergoing rTHA were propensity score matched to 80 patients undergoing mTHA for OA. Patients were matched for age, sex, and preoperative function. The Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) were collected pre- and postoperatively (mean 10 months (SD 2.2) in rTHA group and 12 months (SD 0.3) in mTHA group). In addition, patient satisfaction was collected postoperatively. Component accuracy was assessed using Lewinnek and Callanan safe zones, and restoration of leg length were assessed radiologically. Results There were no significant differences in the preoperative demographics (p ≥ 0.781) or function (p ≥ 0.383) between the groups. The postoperative OHS (difference 2.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1 to 4.8; p = 0.038) and FJS (difference 21.1, 95% CI 10.7 to 31.5; p < 0.001) were significantly greater in the rTHA group when compared with the mTHA group. However, only the FJS was clinically significantly greater. There was no difference in the postoperative EQ-5D (difference 0.017, 95% CI -0.042 to 0.077; p = 0.562) between the two groups. No patients were dissatisfied in the rTHA group whereas six were dissatisfied in the mTHA group, but this was not significant (p = 0.176). rTHA was associated with an overall greater rate of component positioning in a safe zone (p ≤ 0.003) and restoration of leg length (p < 0.001). Conclusion Patients undergoing rTHA had a greater hip-specific functional outcome when compared to mTHA, which may be related to improved component positioning and restoration of leg length. However, there was no difference in their postoperative generic health or rate of satisfaction. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(1):22–30.


2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 1408-1414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Whitehouse ◽  
Natalija S. Stefanovich-Lawbuary ◽  
Luke R. Brunton ◽  
Ashley W. Blom

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e0144863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxiao Zhou ◽  
Qi Wang ◽  
Xianlong Zhang ◽  
Yunsu Chen ◽  
Xiaochun Peng ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Fischer ◽  
◽  
Julia Dietz ◽  
Karl-Stefan Delank ◽  
Alexander Zeh ◽  
...  

Introduction: Over the past several years, femoral short-stem hip implants have become more popular as a treatment option in the field of primary hip arthroplasty for younger and more active patients. Current data on clinical outcomes and the implant survival rates in patients with short-stem implants cover a maximum of five to six years. The aim of this study was to assess the survival rates, as well as clinical and functional outcomes, in total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the Nanos® short-stem implant (Smith & Nephew, Marl, Germany) over a follow-up period exceeding 5 y. Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective study included the first 100 patients who were treated at the Department of Orthopedics at the University Hospital Halle (Saale) between January 2008 and February 2009. Ultimately, the complete data of 51 patients (54 hips) were reviewed. The follow-up period was from May to November 2017. We evaluated patient satisfaction regarding pain and function using a grading system. The Harris Hip Score and Forgotten Joint Score were obtained to evaluate functional outcome after THA. Postoperative radiographic evaluation included the measurement of leg-length discrepancy, changes in the shaft axis, femoral offset and horizontal or vertical center of rotation. Potential postoperative shaft angulation or axial shaft migration was also determined. Radiographic images were checked for radiolucent lines and heterotopic ossification using the classification systems outlined by Green and Brooker. Results: The average follow-up was 97.8 months (8.2 y). The mean patient age at follow-up was 68 y and the body mass index was 28.2 kg/m2. The mean Harris hip score at follow-up was 92.0 and the Forgotten Joint Score was 91.7 %. Survey results showed that patient satisfaction and pain perception were rated very good. No significant change in leg length was observed (mean: 0.1 mm shortening). Overall, a rather varus stem positioning was detected postoperatively (mean: 3.1°). The femoral offset was slightly reduced on average in the entire patient group (mean: -1.8 mm). In the horizontal plane, lateralization of the center of rotation was detected overall (mean: 0.7 mm). In the vertical plane, cranialization was noted (mean: 1.4 mm). The CCD angle did not change. There was no further stem migration postoperatively. Radiolucent lines occurred in 10 cases in Gruen zones 1 and 7. Heterotopic ossification occurred in stages 1 to 3 according to the Brooker classification system. We found no cases of aseptic loosening or other reasons for revision. Conclusion: The outcomes after a mean follow-up of 97.8 months (8.2 y) showed that high levels of patient satisfaction and functional outcome can be achieved with the use of a short-stem endoprosthesis. Sufficient restoration of the patient's individual anatomy paired with high survival rates makes this short-stem prosthesis a reliable implant in total hip arthroplasty.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 618-625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Babar Kayani ◽  
Sujith Konan ◽  
Atif Ayuob ◽  
Salamah Ayyad ◽  
Fares S. Haddad

Robotic total hip arthroplasty (THA) improves accuracy in achieving the planned acetabular cup positioning compared to conventional manual THA. Robotic THA improves precision and reduces outliers in restoring the planned centre of hip rotation compared to conventional manual THA. Improved accuracy in restoring hip biomechanics and acetabular cup positioning in robotic THA have not translated to any differences in early functional outcomes, correction of leg-length discrepancy, or postoperative complications compared to conventional manual THA. Limitations of robotic THA include substantive installation costs, additional radiation exposure, steep learning curves for gaining surgical proficiency, and compatibility of the robotic technology with a limited number of implant designs. Further higher quality studies are required to compare differences in conventional versus robotic THA in relation to long-term functional outcomes, implant survivorship, time to revision surgery, and cost-effectiveness. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:618-625. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180088


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document