scholarly journals Epidemiology of musculoskeletal upper extremity ambulatory surgery in the United States

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitin B Jain ◽  
Laurence D Higgins ◽  
Elena Losina ◽  
Jamie Collins ◽  
Philip E Blazar ◽  
...  
Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randi S. Cartmill ◽  
Dou-Yan Yang ◽  
Benjamin J. Walker ◽  
Yasmin S. Bradfield ◽  
Tony L. Kille ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. e242-e244 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Karl ◽  
Patrick R. Olson ◽  
Melvin P. Rosenwasser

2011 ◽  
Vol 120 (11) ◽  
pp. 727-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Bhattacharyya

Objectives: I undertook to determine benchmarks and variability for the surgical times associated with ambulatory otolaryngological procedures in the United States. Methods: I examined the 2006 release of the National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery and extracted all cases of otolaryngological surgery in which one, and only one, otolaryngological procedure was performed. The mean surgical times and operating room times were determined for each procedure that met reliability criteria for their estimates. A secondary analysis was computed for tonsillectomy and for tonsillectomy plus adenoidectomy according to a patient age of greater than 12 years. Results: An estimated 1.68 ± 0.23 million otolaryngological procedures were analyzed as solitary procedures, including 507,000 cases of myringotomy with ventilation tube placement, 136,000 cases of tonsillectomy, and 429,000 cases of tonsillectomy plus adenoidectomy. The mean (±SE) surgical times were 8.0 ± 0.5, 23.9 ± 1.8, and 20.3 ± 0.8 minutes, respectively. The total operating room times were 17.6 ± 0.9, 48.2 ± 2.0, and 40.7 ± 1.1 minutes, respectively. Septoplasty with turbinectomy was the most common rhinologic procedure performed (48,000 cases analyzed) and had surgical and operating room times of 49.6 ± 4.78 and 79.8 ± 5.8 minutes, respectively. The surgical times for tonsillectomy and tonsillectomy plus adenoidectomy did not differ significantly in magnitude according to standard age cutoffs, although the operating room time was slightly (11.7 minutes) longer for tonsillectomy in patients more than 12 years of age (p = 0.034). Conclusions: The surgical times for the performance of the most common otolaryngological ambulatory procedures are remarkably consistent in the United States. Given the volume and consistency of these surgical procedures, they are ideal candidates for studies of cost and efficiency.


Hand ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 155894472092662
Author(s):  
Andrew R. Summers ◽  
Adnan N. Cheema ◽  
Kevin Pirruccio ◽  
Nikolas H. Kazmers ◽  
Benjamin L. Gray

Background: This study aimed to describe the epidemiology of pediatric upper extremity injury secondary to nonballistic firearms in the United States. Methods: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance Survey (NEISS) database was queried between 2000 and 2017 for injuries to the upper extremity from nonballistic firearms in patients aged ≤18 years. In total, 1502 unique cases were identified. Using input parameters intrinsic to the NEISS database, national weighted estimates were derived using Stata/IC 15.1 statistical software (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas), which yielded an estimate of 52 118 cases of nonballistic firearm trauma to the upper extremity who presented to US emergency departments over the study period. Descriptive statistics were performed using NEISS parameters. Results: An average of 2895 annual pediatric upper extremity nonballistic firearm injuries were identified between 2000 and 2017. Over 91% were sustained by men, and adolescents aged 12 to 18 were the most commonly injured (69.8%). Only 3.5% of all injuries required inpatient admission, and the most common sites of injury were the hand (41.1%), followed by fingers (35.9%). Conclusions: We conclude that nonballistic firearm injuries represent a significant burden of disease to adolescent men in the United States.


1994 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 21-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Jacobs ◽  
Judith R. Lave ◽  
Edward Hall ◽  
Charles Botz

The implementation of inpatient case mix funding in Alberta and Ontario does not allow for adequate incentives to shift resources to an outpatient basis, where appropriate, or to provide outpatient care efficiently. This paper explores the prospects and problems of further extending case mix tools into this area. The availability of tools to characterize output for day surgery, special clinics and emergency care is surveyed. We conclude that case mix funding is desirable and feasible for ambulatory surgery; however, it is questionable for emergency care and special clinics. However, developments in this area in the United States will continue, and this will likely maintain an interest in Canada.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document