scholarly journals Medication reconciliation at hospital admission and discharge: insufficient knowledge, unclear task reallocation and lack of collaboration as major barriers to medication safety

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelleke van Sluisveld ◽  
Marieke Zegers ◽  
Stephanie Natsch ◽  
Hub Wollersheim
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 153-163
Author(s):  
Zoe Co ◽  
A. Jay Holmgren ◽  
David C. Classen ◽  
Lisa P. Newmark ◽  
Diane L. Seger ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Substantial research has been performed about the impact of computerized physician order entry on medication safety in the inpatient setting; however, relatively little has been done in ambulatory care, where most medications are prescribed. Objective To outline the development and piloting process of the Ambulatory Electronic Health Record (EHR) Evaluation Tool and to report the quantitative and qualitative results from the pilot. Methods The Ambulatory EHR Evaluation Tool closely mirrors the inpatient version of the tool, which is administered by The Leapfrog Group. The tool was piloted with seven clinics in the United States, each using a different EHR. The tool consists of a medication safety test and a medication reconciliation module. For the medication test, clinics entered test patients and associated test orders into their EHR and recorded any decision support they received. An overall percentage score of unsafe orders detected, and order category scores were provided to clinics. For the medication reconciliation module, clinics demonstrated how their EHR electronically detected discrepancies between two medication lists. Results For the medication safety test, the clinics correctly alerted on 54.6% of unsafe medication orders. Clinics scored highest in the drug allergy (100%) and drug–drug interaction (89.3%) categories. Lower scoring categories included drug age (39.3%) and therapeutic duplication (39.3%). None of the clinics alerted for the drug laboratory or drug monitoring orders. In the medication reconciliation module, three (42.8%) clinics had an EHR-based medication reconciliation function; however, only one of those clinics could demonstrate it during the pilot. Conclusion Clinics struggled in areas of advanced decision support such as drug age, drug laboratory, and drub monitoring. Most clinics did not have an EHR-based medication reconciliation function and this process was dependent on accessing patients' medication lists. Wider use of this tool could improve outpatient medication safety and can inform vendors about areas of improvement.


Author(s):  
Brígida Dias Fernandes ◽  
Leonardo Coutinho Ribeiro ◽  
Josefa Cristina Pereira dos Santos ◽  
Lorena Rocha Ayres ◽  
Clarice Chemello

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 1460-1469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer E Prey ◽  
Fernanda Polubriaginof ◽  
Lisa V Grossman ◽  
Ruth Masterson Creber ◽  
Demetra Tsapepas ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Unintentional medication discrepancies contribute to preventable adverse drug events in patients. Patient engagement in medication safety beyond verbal participation in medication reconciliation is limited. We conducted a pilot study to determine whether patients’ use of an electronic home medication review tool could improve medication safety during hospitalization. Materials and Methods Patients were randomized to use a toolbefore orafter hospital admission medication reconciliation to review and modify their home medication list. We assessed the quantity, potential severity, and potential harm of patients’ and clinicians’ medication changes. We also surveyed clinicians to assess the tool’s usefulness. Results Of 76 patients approached, 65 (86%) participated. Forty-eight (74%) made changes to their home medication list [before: 29 (81%),after: 19 (66%),p = .170].Before group participants identified 57 changes that clinicians subsequently missed on admission medication reconciliation. Thirty-nine (74%) had a significant or greater potential severity, and 19 (36%) had a greater than 50-50 chance of harm.After group patients identified 68 additional changes to their reconciled medication lists. Fifty-one (75%) had a significant or greater potential severity, and 33 (49%) had a greater than 50-50 chance of harm. Clinicians reported believing that the tool would save time, and patients would supply useful information. Discussion The results demonstrate a high willingness of patients to engage in medication reconciliation, and show that patients were able to identify important medication discrepancies and often changes that clinicians missed. Conclusion Engaging patients in admission medication reconciliation using an electronic home medication review tool may improve medication safety during hospitalization.


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A156.3-A157
Author(s):  
L González-García ◽  
S Belda-Rustarazo ◽  
S Ruiz-Fuentes ◽  
C Medarde-Caballero ◽  
C Fernández-López ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 40-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia Bernstein ◽  
Judith Frampton ◽  
Neil B. Minkoff ◽  
Salpi Stepanian ◽  
Lisa Lapicca ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 155 (35) ◽  
pp. 1395-1405
Author(s):  
Ádám Freisinger ◽  
Judit Lám ◽  
Lilla Barki ◽  
Márton Király ◽  
Éva Belicza

Introduction: For medication safety improvement medication reconciliation was proven to be an effective method transferable between different healthcare providers and ward profiles. Aim: Gaining a better understanding of the process of reconciling medicines. Mapping the driving and restraining forces of introducing medication reconciliation. Method: A search of the literature was conducted. 19 databases were searched using 7 different search engines. The relevance of the papers was rated by two independent experts. Data were extracted based on a previously compiled extraction tool. Results: 230 articles were evaluated. Limits and driving forces of implementing medication reconciliation were set out. Often mentioned implementation obstacles were: communication issues, disengagement of the leaders, unpredictable resources and competence problems. Recommendations mainly consisted of process redesign techniques, presentation of cost-effectiveness data and arranging special training for staff. Conclusions: For improvement of medication safety in Hungarian hospitals implementing medication reconciliation should be considered. The conclusion of ongoing on-site trials as well as limits and success factors identified in this paper should taken into account. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(35), 1395–1405.


2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 491-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sébastien Doerper ◽  
Julien Godet ◽  
Jean François Alexandra ◽  
Benoit Allenet ◽  
Emmanuel Andres ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 808-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Géraldine Leguelinel-Blache ◽  
Fabrice Arnaud ◽  
Sophie Bouvet ◽  
Florent Dubois ◽  
Christel Castelli ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document