scholarly journals Relationship between risk information on total colonoscopy and patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening options: Analysis using the Analytic Hierarchy Process

2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichi Katsumura ◽  
Hideo Yasunaga ◽  
Tomoaki Imamura ◽  
Kazuhiko Ohe ◽  
Hiroshi Oyama
2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 225-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjan J.M. Hummel ◽  
Fabian Volz ◽  
Jeannette G. van Manen ◽  
Marion Danner ◽  
Charalabos-Markos Dintsios ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 225-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjan J. M. Hummel ◽  
Fabian Volz ◽  
Jeannette G. van Manen ◽  
Marion Danner ◽  
Charalabos-Markos Dintsios ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Travis Hyams ◽  
Bruce Golden ◽  
John Sammarco ◽  
Shahnaz Sultan ◽  
Evelyn King-Marshall ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In 2021, the United States Preventive Services Task Force updated their recommendation, stating that individuals ages 45-49 should initiate screening for colorectal cancer. Since several screening strategies are recommended, making a shared decision involves including an individual’s preferences. Few studies have included individuals under age 50. In this study, we use a multicriteria decision analysis technique called the Analytic Hierarchy Process to explore preferences for screening strategies and evaluate whether preferences vary by age. Methods Participants evaluated a hierarchy with 3 decision alternatives (colonoscopy, fecal immunochemical test, and computed tomography colonography), 3 criteria (test effectiveness, the screening plan, and features of the test) and 7 sub-criteria. We used the linear fit method to calculate consistency ratios and the eigenvector method for group preferences. We conducted sensitivity analysis to assess whether results are robust to change and tested differences in preferences by participant variables using chi-square and analysis of variance. Results Of the 579 individuals surveyed, 556 (96%) provided complete responses to the AHP portion of the survey. Of these, 247 participants gave responses consistent enough (CR < 0.18) to be included in the final analysis. Participants that were either white or have lower health literacy were more likely to be excluded due to inconsistency. Colonoscopy was the preferred strategy in those < 50 and fecal immunochemical test was preferred by those over age 50 (p = 0.002). These results were consistent when we restricted analysis to individuals ages 45-55 (p = 0.011). Participants rated test effectiveness as the most important criteria for making their decision (weight = 0.555). Sensitivity analysis showed our results were robust to shifts in criteria and sub-criteria weights. Conclusions We reveal potential differences in preferences for screening strategies by age that could influence the adoption of screening programs to include individuals under age 50. Researchers and practitioners should consider at-home interventions using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to assist with the formulation of preferences that are key to shared decision-making. The costs associated with different preferences for screening strategies should be explored further if limited resources must be allocated to screen individuals ages 45-49.


2019 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Luz Judith Rodríguez-Esparza ◽  
Diana Barraza-Barraza ◽  
Jesús Salazar-Ibarra ◽  
Rafael Gerardo Vargas-Pasaye

Objectives: To identify early suicide risk signs on depressive subjects, so that specialized care can be provided. Various studies have focused on studying expressions on social networks, where users pour their emotions, to determine if they show signs of depression or not. However, they have neglected the quantification of the risk of committing suicide. Therefore, this article proposes a new index for identifying suicide risk in Mexico. Methodology: The proposal index is constructed through opinion mining using Twitter and the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Contribution: Using R statistical package, a study is presented considering real data, making a classification of people according to the obtained index and using information from psychologists. The proposed methodology represents an innovative prevention alternative for suicide.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document