scholarly journals A Rasch and confirmatory factor analysis of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) - 12

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam B Smith ◽  
Lesley J Fallowfield ◽  
Dan P Stark ◽  
Galina Velikova ◽  
Valerie Jenkins
2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 1291-1298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alicia Padrón ◽  
Iñaki Galán ◽  
María Durbán ◽  
Ana Gandarillas ◽  
Fernando Rodríguez-Artalejo

2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Kalliath ◽  
Michael P. O'Driscoll ◽  
Paula Brough

2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hudson Wander de Carvalho ◽  
Christopher J. Patrick ◽  
Miguel Roberto Jorge ◽  
Sérgio Baxter Andreoli

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the structural coherency of the 60-item version of the General Health Questionnaire via exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. METHOD: The study design is a cross-sectional survey. A random sample of 146 individuals from the city of Divinópolis-MG volunteered to participate in the present study and responded to the 60-item version of the General Health Questionnaire adapted and validated for use in Brazil. Statistics consisted of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability was estimated using Cronbach's alpha method. RESULTS: Alpha coefficients for all five content scales of the General Health Questionnaire were high (α > 0.8). For four of the five scales, a unifactorial model of constituent items provided a good fit to the data. Items comprising the fifth scale, Psychic Stress, exhibited a two-correlated factor structure. A factor analysis of scores for the five scales yielded strong evidence of coherency, with all scales loading substantially on a single common factor. CONCLUSION: The General Health Questionnaire shows good psychometric coherency as evidenced by high internal consistency and unidimensionality of all but one of its constituent scales, and uniformly high loadings of all scales on a single overarching factor. These results are consistent with prior findings from the General Health Questionnaire developmental study and Brazilian adaptation studies.


2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahboubeh Dadfar ◽  
Zornitsa Kalibatseva ◽  
David Lester

Abstract Introduction: The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a brief screening and diagnostic tool for depression. It has been used in research and clinical practice in primary care and other clinical and non-clinical settings. The PHQ-9 has not had its validity examined in psychiatric and psychological settings in Iran. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate the validation of the Farsi version of the PHQ-9. A convenience sample of 130 Iranian volunteer psychiatric outpatients was selected from psychiatric and psychological clinics. They completed the PHQ-9, the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15), the World Health Organization-five Well-Being Index (WHO-5), and the short form of the Beck Depression Inventory-13 (BDI-13). Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, Cronbach's α, Pearson correlation coefficient, principal component analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. Results: Mean score of the PHQ-9 was 12.83 (standard deviation = 6.25), indicating moderately severe depression in the sample. Cronbach's α coefficient for PHQ-9 was 0.88, and one-week test-retest reliability 0.79. The PHQ-9 correlated 0.64 with PHQ-15, −0.35 with WHO-5, and 0.70 with BDI-13, indicating good construct and criterion-related validity. The results of the factor analysis of PHQ-9 items identified and confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a single factor labeled general depression. Conclusions: The PHQ-9 appears to have a unidimensional structure, adequate validity and reliability, and can be useful in epidemiological/research settings. Based on previous literature and on the present findings, the PHQ-9 may have applicability to other contexts in the studied population, but this needs to be confirmed by other studies.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. e0254333
Author(s):  
Ali Poorebrahim ◽  
Chung-Ying Lin ◽  
Vida Imani ◽  
Shapour Soltankhah Kolvani ◽  
Seyed Abbas Alaviyoun ◽  
...  

Aim This study tested the construct validity (i.e., factor structure) of the Persian Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) on a sample of male prisoners. Methods All the participants (mean±SD age = 39.44±7.94 years) completed three scales—the Persian MAAS, the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch analysis with differential item functioning (DIF) were applied to examine the construct validity of the MAAS. Specifically, the DIF was tested across different insomnia status (using ISI with a cutoff of 15), psychiatric well-being status (using GHQ-12 with a cutoff of 12), and age (using mean age of 39.44 as the cutoff). Results The CFA results showed a single factor solution for the Persian MAAS. The Rasch results showed all MAAS items fit in the construct (infit mean square [MnSq] = 0.72 to 1.41; outfit MnSq = 0.74 to 1.39) without displaying DIF items (DIF contrast = -0.34 to 0.31 for insomnia condition; -0.22 to 0.25 for psychiatric well-being; -0.26 to 0.29 for age). Conclusions The Persian version of the MAAS is, therefore, a valid instrument to measure mindfulness among Iranian male prisoners.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document