Implementation of the Core Outcome Measures CPG: Assessing the Know-Do Gap

2021 ◽  
Vol 102 (10) ◽  
pp. e94
Author(s):  
Amy Yorke ◽  
Suzanne Trojanowski ◽  
Nora Fritz
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
The Core ◽  
Core Outcome Measures

Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for the neck pain

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 186-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gul Oznur Karabicak ◽  
Zeynep Hazar Kanik ◽  
Gurkan Gunaydin ◽  
Omer Osman Pala ◽  
Seyit Citaker
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
Turkish Version ◽  
The Core ◽  
Core Outcome Measures

The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) is a Responsive Measure of Patient-Rated Outcome After Surgery for Cervical Myelopathy

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. S136
Author(s):  
Francois Porchet ◽  
Sina Finkenstaedt ◽  
Hans-Juergen Becker ◽  
Anne F. Mannion
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
The Core ◽  
Core Outcome Measures

scholarly journals Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the core outcome measures index (COMI) for the neck

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 863-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Monticone ◽  
Simona Ferrante ◽  
Serena Maggioni ◽  
Gisel Grenat ◽  
Giovanni A. Checchia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
Italian Version ◽  
The Core ◽  
Culturally Adapted ◽  
Core Outcome Measures ◽  
The Cross

scholarly journals Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Dutch Version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for the Neck in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Degenerative Disease of the Cervical Spine

Neurospine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 798-805
Author(s):  
Pravesh S. Gadjradj ◽  
Timothy C. Chin-See-Chong ◽  
Daphne Donk ◽  
Paul Depauw ◽  
Maurits W. van Tulder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Psychometric Validation ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
Dutch Version ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
The Core ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Core Outcome Measures ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Objective: To perform the psychometric validation of the Dutch version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the neck.Methods: A total of 178 patients, who had an indication for surgery due to degenerative cervical spinal disease, were enrolled in the study. They filled in a baseline booklet containing the Dutch version of the COMI-neck, Likert-scales for neck and arm/shoulder pain, the Neck Disability Index (NDI), the EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) and the 12-item Short Form health survey (SF-12). Aside from analyzing construct validity using the Spearman correlation test, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness at 3 months were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, respectively.Results: The COMI-neck showed good acceptability with missing data ranging from 0% to 4.5% and some floor/ceiling effects for 3 of the domains at baseline. The COMI-summary score showed good to very good correlation with the EQ5D (ρ = -0.43), the physical component summary of the SF-12 (ρ = -0.47) and the NDI (ρ = 0.73). Individual domains showed correlations of -0.28 to 0.85 with the reference questionnaires. Test-retest reliability analysis showed an ICC of 0.91 with a minimal detectable change of 1.7. Responsiveness analysis of the COMI-neck showed an area under 0.79 under the ROC-curve. The standardized response mean for a good outcome was 1.24 and for a poor outcome 0.37.Conclusion: The current study shows that the Dutch version of the COMI-neck is a valid, reliable and responsive Patient-Reported Outcome Measure, among patients undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical spinal disorders.

scholarly journals Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in patients with low back pain

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphane Genevay ◽  
Christine Cedraschi ◽  
Marc Marty ◽  
Sylvie Rozenberg ◽  
Pierre De Goumoëns ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
Low Back ◽  
French Version ◽  
The Core ◽  
Culturally Adapted ◽  
Core Outcome Measures

scholarly journals Study protocol: a core outcome set for perinatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simen Vergote ◽  
Felix De Bie ◽  
Jan Bosteels ◽  
Holly Hedrick ◽  
James Duffy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Diaphragmatic Hernia ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
The Core ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Core Outcome Measures ◽  
Effectiveness Trials

Abstract Background Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is, depending of the severity, a birth defect associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Prenatal screening by ultrasound may detect this condition and comprehensive assessment of severity is possible, allowing for in utero referral to an experienced centre for planned delivery. In an effort to improve outcomes, prenatal interventions to stimulate lung development were proposed. Along the same lines, new postnatal management strategies are being developed. In order to enable proper comparison of novel perinatal interventions as well as outcomes, a set of uniform and relevant outcome measures is required. Core outcome sets (COS) are agreed, clearly defined sets of outcomes to be measured in a standardised manner and reported consistently. Herein we aim to describe the methodology we will use to define a COS for perinatal and neonatal outcomes of foetuses and newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia and to draft a dissemination and implementation plan. Methods We will use the methodology described in the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative Handbook. An international steering group will be created to guide the development of the COS. We are systematically reviewing the literature to identify all potential relevant pre- and neonatal outcomes previously used in studies on perinatal interventions for CDH. We will build a consensus on these core outcomes in a stakeholder group using the Delphi method. After completion, a stakeholder meeting will decide on a final COS, using a modified Nominal Group Technique. Thereafter, we will review potential definitions and measurements of these outcomes, and again a consensus meeting will be organised, to finalise the COS before dissemination. Discussion We have started a procedure to develop a COS for studies on perinatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia, with the purpose of improving the quality of research, guide clinical practice and improve patient care and eventual use in future clinical trials, systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines. Trial registration We prospectively registered this study in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (registration number: CRD42019124399) and The Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative (registration number:1296).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document