scholarly journals A mid term comparison of open wedge high tibial osteotomy vs unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryohei Takeuchi ◽  
Yusuke Umemoto ◽  
Masato Aratake ◽  
Haruhiko Bito ◽  
Izumi Saito ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 695 ◽  
pp. 139-143
Author(s):  
Ioan Cristescu ◽  
Cristi Angheluta ◽  
Florin Safta ◽  
Daniel Vilcioiu ◽  
Alsed Gjoni ◽  
...  

In the case of patients suffering from medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee, a high tibial osteotomy is the preferred treatment for preserving the knee articulation and correcting the knee biomechanical axis. Nowadays, the open wedge high tibial osteotomy is the preferred surgical technique for treating patient with varus knee angulation. The procedure consists in creating a medial gap in the proximal tibial metaphysis that is filled with autologus bone graft or bone substitutes. Synthetic bone substitutes made by bioceramics like hydroxyapatite or tricalcium phosphate are becoming more popular. Tricalcium phosphate (TCP) used as a bone substitute has shown to have osteoconductive properties and it is resorbable. We describe our experience in Orthopaedics III Department of the Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest, where we treated a total of 26 patients suffering from medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee with high tibial open wedge osteotomy, between 2011 and 2015. TCP wedge implants were successfully used as bone substitutes for the tibial medial osteotomy in conjunction with a proximal tibia plate and screws. Open wedge high tibia osteotomy used for correcting the biomechanical axis of the lower limb is a safe surgical procedure that preserves the anatomical knee joint.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 606-614
Author(s):  
Sunil Sheshrao Nikose ◽  
Devashree Nikose ◽  
Aditya L Kekatpure ◽  
Shashank Jain ◽  
Kiran Saoji ◽  
...  

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Mostafa El-Ganzoury ◽  
Zeiad Mohamed Zakaria ◽  
Ahmed Elsayed ◽  
Abd Ellah Elwarwary

Abstract Background Several surgical procedures have been mentioned to treat medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA), as total knee arthroplasty (TKA), unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Objectives The aim of the study is a systematic review & meta analysis conducted to compare the outcomes between UKA & HTO in different types of patients diagnosed as an isolated medial compartment OA who treated with UKA or HTO and statistically compare between their results of pain, range of motion, complications, and i ncidence of revision to TKA using studies published between 2009 to 2019 from any country. Patients and Methods The review will be restricted to Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), clinical trials, and comparative studies, either prospective or retrospective, which studied the outcome of HTO versus UKA of isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis patients, articles published in English &published during 2009 to 2019. Results About 150 articles were found using search keywords. By filtration and screening of the title and exclusion of unrelated articles, about 60 articles were found. By applications of all inclusion and exclusion criteria, only 12 articles were fit to undergo this meta-analysis. Conclusion In conclusion, there were no significant differences in the pain score, knee score, complication rate and revision rate to TKA between HTO and UKA, while the HTO group manifested superior ROM compared to the UKA group. So, HTO may be convenient for patients with high activity requirements. Over time, both groups exhibited increased revision rates with the deteriorated clinical outcomes. Therefore when deciding on a therapeutic plan, the ability to revise these failed choices of treatment to a total knee arthroplasty should be a major consideration. This may assist surgeons in their choice. Based on the findings of current meta-analysis, it appears that the two groups have the same efficiency and safety in the treatment of medial knee OA.


2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher A Brown ◽  
Tyler S Watters ◽  
Richard C Mather ◽  
Lori A Orlando

ABSTRACT Background Interest in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has recently increased in the United States concomitantly with an increase in the prevalence of physiologically active patients presenting with medial compartment osteoarthritis. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of UKA compared with high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis. Methods A Markov decision model was constructed with review of literature to conduct a cost-utility analysis of UKA as compared to HTO in a patient population aged 40 years at the time of surgical intervention. Utility values were assigned to health states annually based on the commonly accepted reference values of 1 being “full health” and 0 being “death”. These values are used to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The Markov decision model was used to evaluate the total accumulated costs and effectiveness, measured in QALYs. Results The average cost of the UKA was cheaper by $842 and resulted in a significant incremental effectiveness gain compared to HTO (+ 0.96 QALY). UKA gained 20.05 QALY at a cost-effectiveness (C/E) ratio of $1048/QALY, whereas HTO gained 19.09 QALY at a C/E ratio of $1145/QALY. Conclusion Both UKA and HTO are cost-effective procedures but patients treated with UKA may experience an increased net health benefit over their lifetime. Level of evidence Economic and decision analysis level II.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document