scholarly journals Use of non-invasive mechanical ventilation with pressure support guaranteed with average volume (AVAPS) in de novo hypoxemic respiratory failure

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Killen Harold Briones Claudett ◽  
Michelle Grunauer
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Pressure Support ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Average Volume ◽  
Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure ◽  
Non Invasive

scholarly journals Non-invasive mechanical ventilation with average volume-assured pressure support. Results according to the aetiology of acute respiratory failure

2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 403-410
Author(s):  
Killen Harold Briones Claudett ◽  
Antonio Esquinas Rodriguez ◽  
Mónica H. Briones Claudett ◽  
Miguel Puga Tejada ◽  
Mariuxi del Pilar Cabrera Bańos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Pressure Support ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Average Volume ◽  
Non Invasive

scholarly journals Non-Invasive Oxygenation Strategies in Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure: A Protocol for a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Leonel Ferreyro ◽  
Federico Angriman ◽  
Laveena Munshi ◽  
Lorenzo del Sorbo ◽  
Niall D Ferguson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure ◽  
Non Invasive

Abstract Background: Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is one of the leading causes of intensive care unit admission and associated with high mortality. Non-invasive oxygenation strategies such as high flow nasal cannula, standard oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation (delivered by either face mask or helmet interface) are widely available interventions applied in these patients. It remains unclear which of these interventions are more effective in decreasing rates of invasive mechanical ventilation and mortality. The primary objective of this network meta-analysis is to summarize the evidence and compare the effect of non-invasive oxygenation strategies on mortality and need for invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Methods: We will search key databases for randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of non-invasive oxygenation strategies in adult patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. We will exclude studies in which the primary focus is either acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or cardiogenic pulmonary edema. The primary outcome will be all-cause mortality (longest available up to 90 days). The secondary outcomes will be receipt of invasive mechanical ventilation (longest available up to 30 days). We will assess the risk of bias for each of the outcomes using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Bayesian network meta-analyses will be conducted to obtain pooled estimates of head-to-head comparisons. We will report pairwise and network meta-analysis treatment effect estimates as risk ratios and 95% credible intervals. Subgroup analyses will be conducted examining key populations including immunocompromised hosts. Sensitivity analyses will be conducted by excluding those studies with high risk of bias and different etiologies of acute respiratory failure. We will assess certainty in effect estimates using GRADE methodology. Discussion : This study will help to guide clinical decision making when caring for adult patients with AHRF and improve our understanding of the limitations of the available literature assessing noninvasive oxygenation strategies in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

scholarly journals Use of noninvasive mechanical ventilation with pressure support guaranteed with average volume in de novo hypoxaemic respiratory failure. A pilot study

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 283-290
Author(s):  
Killen Harold Briones-Claudett ◽  
Antonio Esquinas Rodriguez ◽  
Mónica H Briones-Claudett ◽  
Miguel Puga-Tejada ◽  
Mariuxi del Pilar Cabrera Baños ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Pressure Support ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Average Volume

scholarly journals Noninvasive Oxygenation Strategies in Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure: A Protocol for a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Leonel Ferreyro ◽  
Federico Angriman ◽  
Laveena Munshi ◽  
Lorenzo del Sorbo ◽  
Niall D Ferguson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure ◽  
Non Invasive

Abstract Background: Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is one of the leading causes of intensive care unit admission and associated with high mortality. Non-invasive oxygenation strategies such as high flow nasal cannula, standard oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation (delivered by either face mask or helmet interface) are widely available interventions applied in these patients. It remains unclear which of these interventions are more effective in decreasing rates of invasive mechanical ventilation and mortality. The primary objective of this network meta-analysis is to summarize the evidence and compare the effect of non-invasive oxygenation strategies on mortality and need for invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Methods: We will search key databases for randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of non-invasive oxygenation strategies in adult patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. We will exclude studies in which the primary focus is either acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or cardiogenic pulmonary edema. The primary outcome will be all-cause mortality (longest available up to 90 days). The secondary outcomes will be receipt of invasive mechanical ventilation (longest available up to 30 days). We will assess the risk of bias for each of the outcomes using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Bayesian network meta-analyses will be conducted to obtain pooled estimates of head-to-head comparisons. We will report pairwise and network meta-analysis treatment effect estimates as risk ratios and 95% credible intervals. Subgroup analyses will be conducted examining key populations including immunocompromised hosts. Sensitivity analyses will be conducted by excluding those studies with high risk of bias and different etiologies of acute respiratory failure. We will assess certainty in effect estimates using GRADE methodology. Discussion : This study will help to guide clinical decision making when caring for adult patients with AHRF and improve our understanding of the limitations of the available literature assessing noninvasive oxygenation strategies in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document