scholarly journals Adverse events associated with continuous interscalene block administered using the catheter-over-needle method: a retrospective analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meishu Tanijima ◽  
Kenichi Takechi ◽  
Kazuo Nakanishi ◽  
Toshihiro Yorozuya

Abstract Background Continuous interscalene block is widely used for pain management in shoulder surgery. However, continuous interscalene block performed using the catheter-through-needle method is reportedly associated with adverse events such as pericatheter leakage of the local anesthetic, phrenic nerve paralysis, and hoarseness. Because we expected that the catheter-over-needle method would reduce these adverse events, we examined cases in which continuous interscalene block was performed using the catheter-over-needle method to determine what adverse events occurred and when. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the anesthesia and medical records of adult patients who underwent catheter insertion to receive a continuous interscalene block performed using the catheter-over-needle method at our hospital from July 2015 to July 2017. Results During the surveillance period, 122 adult patients underwent catheter insertion to receive a continuous interscalene block administered using the catheter-over-needle method. No case of pericatheter local anesthetic leakage was observed. Adverse events, such as dyspnea, hoarseness, insufficient anesthetic effect, dizziness, cough reflex during drinking, or ptosis, were observed in 42 patients (34.4%; 95% confidence interval 26–42.7). Most of the adverse events occurred on postoperative day 2. The median time between surgery and the onset of adverse events was 28.5 h. Conclusions The catheter-over-needle method may prevent the pericatheter leakage of the local anesthetic. However, adverse events occurred in more than one-third of the patients. During continuous interscalene block, patients must be carefully observed for adverse events, especially on postoperative day 2. Trial registration This study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry on August 13th, 2019 (UMIN000037673).

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meishu Tanizima ◽  
Kenichi Takechi ◽  
Kazuo Nakanishi ◽  
Toshihiro Yorozuya

Abstract Background: Continuous interscalene block is widely used for pain management in shoulder surgery. However, continuous interscalene block performed using the catheter-through-needle method is reportedly associated with adverse events such as pericatheter leakage of the local anesthetic, phrenic nerve paralysis, and hoarseness. Because we expected that the catheter-over-needle method would reduce these adverse events, we examined cases in which continuous interscalene block was performed using the catheter-over-needle method to determine what adverse events occurred and when. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the anesthesia and medical records of adult patients who underwent catheter insertion to receive a continuous interscalene block performed using the catheter-over-needle method at our hospital from July 2015 to July 2017. Results: During the surveillance period, 122 adult patients underwent catheter insertion to receive a continuous interscalene block administered using the catheter-over-needle method. No case of pericatheter local anesthetic leakage was observed. Adverse events, such as dyspnea, hoarseness, insufficient anesthetic effect, dizziness, cough reflex during drinking, or ptosis, were observed in 42 patients (34.4%; 95% confidence interval 26–42.7). Most of the adverse events occurred on postoperative day 2. The median time between surgery and the onset of adverse events was 28.5 h. Conclusions: The catheter-over-needle method may prevent the pericatheter leakage of the local anesthetic. However, adverse events occurred in more than one-third of the patients. During continuous interscalene block, patients must be carefully observed for adverse events, especially on postoperative day 2. Trial registration: This study was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000037673).


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meishu Tanizima ◽  
Kenichi Takechi ◽  
Kazuo Nakanishi ◽  
Toshihiro Yorozuya

Abstract Background: Continuous interscalene block is widely used for pain management in shoulder surgery. However, continuous interscalene block performed using the catheter-through-needle method is reportedly associated with adverse events such as pericatheter leakage of the local anesthetic, phrenic nerve paralysis, and hoarseness. Because we expected that the catheter-over-needle method would reduce these adverse events, we examined cases in which continuous interscalene block was performed using the catheter-over-needle method to determine what adverse events occurred and when. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the anesthesia and medical records of adult patients who underwent catheter insertion to receive a continuous interscalene block performed using the catheter-over-needle method at our hospital from July 2015 to July 2017. Results: During the surveillance period, 122 adult patients underwent catheter insertion to receive a continuous interscalene block administered using the catheter-over-needle method. No case of pericatheter local anesthetic leakage was observed. Adverse events, such as dyspnea, hoarseness, insufficient anesthetic effect, dizziness, cough reflex during drinking, or ptosis, were observed in 42 patients (34.4%; 95% confidence interval 26–42.7). Most of the adverse events occurred on postoperative day 2. The median time between surgery and the onset of adverse events was 28.5 h. Conclusions: The catheter-over-needle method may prevent the pericatheter leakage of the local anesthetic. However, adverse events occurred in more than one-third of the patients. During continuous interscalene block, patients must be carefully observed for adverse events, especially on postoperative day 2. Trial registration: This study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry on August 13th, 2019 (UMIN000037673).


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meisyu Tanizima ◽  
Kenichi Takechi ◽  
Kazuo Nakanishi ◽  
Toshihiro Yorozuya

Abstract Purpose Continuous interscalene block is widely used for pain management in shoulder surgery. However, continuous interscalene block using the catheter-through-needle method reportedly causes adverse events, such as pericatheter leakage of the local anesthetic, phrenic nerve paralysis, and hoarseness. Because we expected the catheter-over-needle method to reduce those adverse events, we analyzed cases in which continuous interscalene block was administered using the catheter-over-needle method to determine when and what adverse events occurred.Methods We retrospectively reviewed anesthesia and medical records of adult patients who inserted the catheter with a continuous interscalene block administered with the catheter-over-needle method at our hospital from July 2015 to July 2017.Results During the surveillance period, 122 adult patients inserted the catheter with a continuous interscalene block administered using the catheter-over-needle method. We found no case of pericatheter local anesthetic leakage. Other adverse events—dyspnea, hoarseness, insufficient anesthetic effect, dizziness, cough reflex during drinking, or ptosis—were observed in 42 cases (34.4%). Most of the adverse events occurred on postoperative day 2. The median time between surgery and onset of the adverse event was 28.5 hours.Conclusions The catheter-over-needle method may prevent the pericatheter leakage of the local anesthetic. However, the number of other adverse events that occurred with continuous interscalene block was remarkable. During continuous interscalene block, patients must be observed carefully for adverse events, especially on postoperative day 2.


1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Smith ◽  
John E. Tetzlaff ◽  
John J. Brems

Background and ObjectivesInterscalene block can be chosen for complete anesthesia for shoulder surgery. Phrenic nerve block occurs with almost all interscalene blocks, but is well tolerated in most patients. This may not be the case in selected geriatric patients.MethodsThe patient is a 90-year-old female with osteoarthritis of the left shoulder scheduled for total shoulder anthroplasty. Past medical history revealed hypertension, mild mitral valve insufficiency, and a remote episode of congestive heart failure. She underwent interscalene block with 40 mL of 1.4% mepivacaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine freshly added, alkalinized with sodium bicarbonate.ResultsThe onset of the block was rapid and complete. The patient had minimal intravenous sedation (0.5 mg midazolam) and was resting comfortably with a respiratory rate of 12-14 breaths/min. Approximately 5 minutes after the injection of local anesthetic, the patient was noted to be alert, cyanotic, denying dyspnea, with an oxygen saturation of 75-85%. A chest radiograph revealed elevation of the ipsilateral hemidiaphragm and no pneumothorax or other pathology. Despite supplemental oxygen by face mask, desaturation persisted and general anesthesia was induced. On emergence from anesthesia, the patient had a complete interscalene block. Repeat chest radiograph after resolution of the block revealed return of hemidiaphragm position and no other pathology. The patient was extubated in the recovery room without difficulty. Following extubation the patient demonstrated stable respirations and normal oxyhemoglobin saturation.ConclusionsIpsilateral phrenic nerve paralysis caused significant respiratory compromise in an elderly patient without known significant pulmonary disease.


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949901668409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Semih Baskan ◽  
Deniz Cankaya ◽  
Hidayet Unal ◽  
Burak Yoldas ◽  
Vildan Taspinar ◽  
...  

Purpose: This study compared the efficacy of continuous interscalene block (CISB) and subacromial infusion of local anesthetic (CSIA) for postoperative analgesia after open shoulder surgery. Methods: This randomized, prospective, double-blinded, single-center study included 40 adult patients undergoing open shoulder surgery. All patients received a standardized general anesthetic. The patients were separated into group CISB and group CSIA. A loading dose of 40 mL 0.25% bupivacaine was administered and patient-controlled analgesia was applied by catheter with 0.1% bupivacaine 5 mL/h throughout 24 h basal infusion, 2 mL bolus dose, and 20 min knocked time in both groups postoperatively. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores, additional analgesia need, local anesthetic consumption, complications, and side effects were recorded during the first 24 h postoperatively. The range of motion (ROM) score was recorded preoperatively and in the first and third weeks postoperatively. Results: A statistically significant difference was determined between the groups in respect of consumption of local anesthetic, VAS scores, additional analgesia consumption, complications, and side effects, with lower values recorded in the CISB group. There were no significant differences in ROM scoring in the preoperative and postoperative third week between the two groups but there were significant differences in ROM scoring in the postoperative first week, with higher ROM scoring values in the group CISB patients. Conclusion: The results of this study have shown that continuous interscalene infusion of bupivacaine is an effective and safe method of postoperative analgesia after open shoulder surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document