scholarly journals Outcomes of tranexamic acid administration in military trauma patients with intracranial hemorrhage: a cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick F. Walker ◽  
Joseph D. Bozzay ◽  
Luke R. Johnston ◽  
Eric A. Elster ◽  
Carlos J. Rodriguez ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-25
Author(s):  
Brian Cornelius ◽  
Quinn Cummings ◽  
Mathieu Assercq ◽  
Erin Rizzo ◽  
Sonja Gennuso ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 852-858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Eckert ◽  
Thomas M. Wertin ◽  
Stuart D. Tyner ◽  
Daniel W. Nelson ◽  
Seth Izenberg ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Vasileia Nyktari ◽  
◽  
Helen Diamantaki ◽  
Georgios Stefanakis ◽  
Emmanouela Koutoulaki ◽  
...  

Objectives: This study aims to clarify the role of prophylactic TXA on blood loss and transfusion requirements in a subgroup of trauma patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery on a non-urgent basis. Study design: This is a retrospective cohort study Setting: Tertiary University Hospital of Crete (2017-2018) Patients/participants: Polytrauma patients who underwent delayed major orthopaedic surgery Main outcome measurement: Significant haemorrhage occurrence in relation to TXA administration. In a subgroup of patients Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) was used to reveal their haemostatic profile prior to TXA administration. Methods: Data from anaesthetic and ICU records were analyzed regarding age, sex, body mass index, ASA physical status, Injury Severity Score, Caprini Score, intraoperative blood loss, number of packed red blood cells units transfused, volume of crystalloids administered, operation duration, preoperative and postoperative haemoglobin values, and days from hospital admission to surgery. ROTEM analysis in a subgroup of patients revealed their haemostatic profile prior to TXA administration. Results: Twenty five out of 46 patients received prophylactic TXA treatment. After adjustment for confounding factors, the odds ratio for the composite endpoint for prophylactic TXA (n=25) vs no TXA (n=21) was 1.27 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.39-4.16). Propensity matched analysis confirmed the absence of a difference between patients with and without TXA. In all patients analyzed with ROTEM normal or hypercoagulable status was revealed. Conclusions: In trauma patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery more than 12 hours after the initial injury, TXA has no effect on blood loss and transfusion requirements. Keywords: tranexamic acid; blood loss; transfusion; orthopaedic trauma surgery; spine surgery; pelvis surgery; significant bleeding in orthopaedic surgery


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick F Walker ◽  
Joseph D. Bozzay ◽  
Luke R. Johnston ◽  
Eric A. Elster ◽  
Carlos J. Rodriguez ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) may be a useful adjunct for military patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). These patients are often treated in austere settings without immediate access to neurosurgical intervention. The purpose of this study was to evaluate any association between TXA use and progression of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), neurologic outcomes, and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in TBI.METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of combat casualties from October 2010 to December 2015 who were transferred to a military treatment facility (MTF) in the United States. Data collected included: demographics, types of injuries, initial and interval head computerized tomography (CT) scans, Glasgow Coma Scores (GCS), and six-month Glasgow Outcome Scores (GOS). Results were stratified based on TXA administration, progression of ICH, and VTE.RESULTS: Of the 687 active duty service members reviewed, 71 patients had ICH (10.3%). Most casualties were injured in a blast (80.3%), with 36 patients (50.7%) sustaining a penetrating TBI. Mean ISS was 28.2 ± 12.3. Nine patients (12.7%) received a massive transfusion within 24 hours of injury, and TXA was administered to 14 (19.7%) casualties. Patients that received TXA had lower initial reported GCS (9.2 ± 4.4 vs. 12.5 ± 3.4, p=0.003), similar discharge GCS (13.3 ±4.0 vs. 13.8±3.2, p=0.58), and a larger improvement between initial and discharge GCS (3.7±3.9 vs. 1.3±3.1, p=0.02). However, there was no difference in mortality (7.1% vs. 7.0%, p=1.00), progression of ICH (45.5% vs. 14.7%, p=0.09), frequency of cranial decompression (50.0% vs. 42.1%, p=0.76), or mean GOS (3.5±0.9 vs. 3.8±1.0, p=0.13). Patients administered TXA had a higher rate of VTE (35.7% vs. 7.0%, p=0.01). On multivariate analysis, however, TXA was not independently associated with VTE.CONCLUSIONS: Patients that received TXA were associated with an improvement in GCS but not in progression of ICH or GOS. TXA was not independently associated with VTE, although this may be related to a paucity of patients receiving TXA. Decisions about TXA administration in combat casualties with ICH should be considered in the context of the availability of neurosurgical intervention as well as severity of extracranial injuries and need for massive transfusion.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000353
Author(s):  
Kathleen E Adair ◽  
Joshua D Patrick ◽  
Eric J Kliber ◽  
Matthew N Peterson ◽  
Seth R Holland

BackgroundThe use of tranexamic acid (TXA) has become increasingly prevalent for hemorrhage prevention in military trauma patients due to its known survival benefits. There is concern of increased venous thromboembolism (VTE) subsequent to receiving TXA. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the rate of VTE in severely injured military personnel during Operation Enduring Freedom (2009–2014).MethodsAn analysis of 859 military trauma patients from the 2009–2014 Department of Defense Trauma Registry included subjects with an injury severity score (ISS) >10 and a massive transfusion (MT) (>10 units of blood products in the first 24 hours). Outcomes included a documented VTE (eg, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE)) during the patient’s hospital course. Comparison between those who did/did not receive TXA was analyzed using three separate multiple regression analyses using listwise deletion, systematic replacement and multiple imputation.ResultsSubjects (n=620) met inclusion criteria with 27% (n=169) having a documented VTE. A total of 30% that received TXA had a documented VTE, 26% that did not receive TXA had a documented VTE and 43% (n=264, n=620) of the sample did not have TXA documented as either given or not given. Multiple regression analyses using listwise deletion and systematic replacement of the TXA variable demonstrated no difference in odds of VTE, whereas the multiple imputation analysis demonstrated a 3% increased odds of VTE, a9.4% increased odds of PE and 8.1% decreased odds of DVT with TXA administration.DiscussionTXA use with an ISS >10 and MT resuscitation had a 3% increased odds of VTE and an increased odds of PE, whereas the odds of DVT were found to be decreased after multiple imputation analysis. Further research on the long-term risks and benefits of TXA usage in the military population is recommended.Level of evidenceIV—therapeutic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document