scholarly journals Correction to: Enablers and barriers to implementing care quality improvement program in nursing homes in China

2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinan Zhao ◽  
Lulu Liao ◽  
Hui Feng ◽  
Huijing Chen ◽  
Hongting Ning
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinan Zhao ◽  
Lulu Liao ◽  
Hui Feng ◽  
Huijing Chen ◽  
Hongting Ning

Abstract Objective To explore the perspectives of key stakeholders on necessary factors to implement care quality improvement program. Methods We conducted qualitative descriptive research in eight nursing homes in four major prefecture-level cities of Changsha, Xiangtan, Zhuzhou, and Yueyang. Data of 50 clinical nurses and 64 nurse assistants were included and analyzed. Ethical approval was given by the medical ethics committee of Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR-IOC-17013109, https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx). One-to-one interviews were used with the nursing managers, and separate focus group discussions were used with the clinical nurses and nurse assistants. All of the interviews were audio recorded and later transcribed verbatim. In addition, the first author documented the responses of every participant in the field notes during the interviews and focus groups. Results The participants’ perspectives were characterized by two main themes: (1) enablers, with four subthemes of “organizational support”, “the evidence-based practice ability”, “proactivity”, “nursing supervision and feedback;” and (2) barriers, with five sub-themes of “low educational background”, “the limitations of self-role orientation”, “resistance to change”, “lack of job motivation”, and “organizational constraints”. Conclusion These findings recognize factors at the organizational level, staff level and societal level that are necessary to implement effective mentoring. The results of this study can provide reference for nursing home in improving nursing management quality, formulating, implementing and revising training policies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 1371-1379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Majid Afshar ◽  
Erum Arain ◽  
Chen Ye ◽  
Emily Gilbert ◽  
Meng Xie ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215013272110002
Author(s):  
Sirikan Rojanasarot ◽  
Angeline M. Carlson ◽  
Wendy L. St. Peter ◽  
Pinar Karaca-Mandic ◽  
Julian Wolfson ◽  
...  

Introduction/Objectives: Enhancing Care for Patients with Asthma (ECPA), a year-long provider-focused, multi-state, multi-clinic quality improvement program, decreased avoidable utilizations among patients with asthma, but its effects on health care expenditures were not determined. This study examined the translational and sustainable effects of improved care through ECPA on individual-level total health care costs due to asthma. Methods: We conducted a retrospective pretest-posttest quasi-experimental study in which attributed 1683 patients in a 12-month pre-ECPA implementation period served as their own control. We constructed the total annual asthma-related health care costs per patient occurred during pre-ECPA implementation, ECPA implementation, and post-ECPA completion. We used 3-level generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) to estimate the ECPA effect on the annual health care costs and account for correlation between the repeated outcome measures for each patient and nested clinic. All costs were adjusted for inflation to 2014 U.S. dollars, the last year of program observation. Results: Total asthma-related health care costs among the 1683 included patients decreased from an average of $7033 to $3237 per person-year (pre-ECPA implementation vs implementation). Using the cost data from the 12-month pre-ECPA implementation period as a reference, GLMMs found that the ECPA implementation was associated with a reduction in total annual asthma-related health care costs by 56.4% (95% CI −60.7%, −51.8%). During the 12-months after ECPA completion period, health care costs were also found to be significantly lower, experiencing a 57.3% reduction. Conclusions: The economic benefits of ECPA provide a justification to adopt this quality improvement initiative to more primary care clinics at a national level.


2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (11) ◽  
pp. 12-25
Author(s):  
Jeanine Maguire ◽  
Denine Hastings ◽  
Mary Adams ◽  
Debra Phillips ◽  
John McKenna ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Turning nursing home residents every 2 hours has been a long-held standard for pressure injury (PrI) prevention in individuals with mobility impairments although evidence to substantiate this practice is limited. New guidelines recommend personalizing turning schedules to support person-centered care but lack specific recommendations about which turning frequencies are appropriate for various risk levels. PURPOSE: This quality improvement program aimed to determine the feasibility and outcomes of using individualized turn schedules for newly admitted nursing home residents. METHODS: An expert panel of wound clinicians developed, tested, and implemented a turn frequency tool that allowed staff in 2 nursing homes to select a turning schedule of 1, 2, 3, or 4 hours based on resident risk factors. Turning schedules were operationalized using a wearable sensor-based visual cueing technology that alerted staff to resident repositioning needs. Nonparticipating resident data were collected for comparison of PrI incidence. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all covariates. Significance of differences tests were performed as appropriate. RESULTS: Over 7 months, 154 residents had their turn period individualized, with 56% qualifying for 3-hour (Q3H) or 4-hour (Q4H) schedules. Facility-acquired PrI incidence was 94% lower in participants than in nonparticipants (P < .0001). Use of 3-hour and 4-hour intervals saved roughly 21 and 35 minutes of staff time, respectively, per resident per shift. CONCLUSION: Individualizing turning schedules is feasible. Residents with longer turning intervals did not develop PrIs, supporting previous studies about safely extending turning periods for most residents.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document