scholarly journals Comparative study of Amsel’s criteria and Nugent scoring for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in a tertiary care hospital, Nepal

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajshree Bhujel ◽  
Shyam Kumar Mishra ◽  
Santosh Kumar Yadav ◽  
Kesang Diki Bista ◽  
Keshab Parajuli
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Bacterial Vaginosis ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Vaginal Discharge ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Gold Standard Method ◽  
Abnormal Vaginal Discharge ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Background The most common pathological cause of abnormal vaginal discharge in reproductive-aged women is bacterial vaginosis (BV). Amsel’s criteria and Nugent scoring systems are commonly employed approaches for the diagnosis of BV. Despite the Nugent scoring system being the gold standard method for diagnosing BV, Amsel’s criteria are generally preferred in clinical setup owing to the fact Nugent scoring requires considerable time and expert microscopist. This study was conducted to determine the diagnostic value of Amsel’s criteria by comparing it with the Nugent scoring system. Methods This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted at Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Nepal from October 2016 to September 2017. Vaginal specimens were collected from a total of 141 women presenting with abnormal vaginal discharge. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of Amsel’s criteria were calculated, and each component of Amsel’s criteria was compared to the Nugent scoring system. Results The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of Amsel’s criteria were 50%, 98.2%, 87.5%, and 88.8% respectively. The clue cells showed 100% specificity and vaginal discharge with pH > 4.5 had 89.3% sensitivity while compared with Nugent’s scoring system. Conclusions Amsel’s criteria can be used as an adjunct method to Nugent scoring for the diagnosis of BV in the hands of skilled manpower in resources limited countries. The presence of clue cell and positive whiff test of Amsel’s criteria shows good match with Nugent’s score.

scholarly journals Comparison of Tzanakis Score vs Alvarado Score in the Effective Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
BR Malla ◽  
H Batajoo
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Negative Appendectomy ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Effective Diagnosis ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background Acute appendicitis is the most frequent surgical emergency encountered worldwide. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of Tzanakis score and Alvarado score in diagnosing acute appendicitis.Objectives The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of Tzanakis scoring system with Alvarado scoring system in diagnosing AA.Methods This was a retrospective and nonrandomized observational study conducted in Dhulikhel hospital. It included 200 clinically diagnosed cases of acute appendicitis who underwent emergency open or laparoscopic appendectomy during the year 2012. Final diagnosis of acute appendicitis was based on histological findings given by pathologist.Results The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of Tzanakis score was 86.9%, 75.0, 97.5% and 33.3% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of Alvarado score was 76.0%, 75.0%, 97.2% and 21.4% respectively. Negative appendectomy was 8.0%. Conclusion Tzanakis scoring system is an effective scoring system in diagnosing acute appendicitis.Kathmandu University Medical Journal Vol.12(1) 2014: 48-50

scholarly journals Correlation of Ultrasound and RIPASA Scoring System in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anand Rai Bansal ◽  
Suvendu Sekhar Jena ◽  
Sanjeev Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Negative Appendicectomy ◽  
Low Sensitivity ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Objective: Correlation of Ultrasound and RIPASA scoring system in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Study Design: 50 patients presenting to emergency underwent ultrasound and evaluation as per RIPASA scoring system followed by emergency appendicectomy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value calculated for each goups. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value for ultrasound were 75.51%, 100%, 100% and 7.69% respectively and that for RIPASA scoring system were 93.9%, 100% 100% and 25% respectively. The negative appendicectomy rate was 2%. Conclusion: RIPASA scoring system may be used for correctly diagnosing acute appendicitis but low sensitivity of ultrasound precludes its routine use and may be used as a complementary tool in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Keywards: Acute Appendictis, RIPASA, Ultrasound.

scholarly journals A Comparative Analysis Between RIPASA and Alvarado Scoring Systems for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis- A Nepalese Perspective

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suman Baral ◽  
Neeraj Thapa ◽  
Raj Kumar Chhetri ◽  
Rupesh Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Negative Appendectomy ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Introduction: Various diagnostic criteria have been described for acute appendicitis. For decades the most commonly used one has been Alvarado score. RIPASA scoring system has also been developed for Asian population which has shown highest sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy. This study aimed to compare these two diagnostic criteria in Nepalese population attending a tertiary center. Methods: Patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis were classified according to both Alvarado and RIPASA scoring systems before undergoing surgery. Histopathological examination was taken as the gold standard for diagnosis. Statistical analysis was done using McNemar's test as applicable. Results: Ninety nine (90 %) patients had histologically confirmed appendicitis. With the cut-off value greater than 7.5 for RIPASA score; sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy and negative appendectomy rates were 94.5%, 27.27 %, 92.16 %, 37.5 %, 88.18% and 7.84% respectively. With the cut-off value greater than 7 for Alvarado score, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy and negative appendectomy rates were 71.72%, 72.73 %, 95.95 %, 22.22%, 71.82 %, and 4.05 % respectively. 94.5% of patients were correctly stratified by RIPASA under higher probability group while only 71.8 % were classified by Alvarado (p value= 0.0001). Conclusion: RIPASA scoring system showed high sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy in comparison to Alvarado scoring system. So, this method can be applied in Nepalese setting for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

scholarly journals Correlation of Ultrasound and RIPASA Scoring System in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (r) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anand Rai BANSAL ◽  
Suvendu Sekhar JENA ◽  
Sanjeev KUMAR
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Negative Appendicectomy ◽  
Low Sensitivity ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Objective: Correlation of Ultrasound and RIPASA scoring system in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Study Design: 50 patients presenting to emergency underwent ultrasound and evaluation as per RIPASA scoring system followed by emergency appendicectomy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value calculated for each goups. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value for ultrasound were 75.51%, 100%, 100% and 7.69% respectively and that for RIPASA scoring system were 93.9%, 100% 100% and 25% respectively. The negative appendicectomy rate was 2%. Conclusion: RIPASA scoring system may be used for correctly diagnosing acute appendicitis but low sensitivity of ultrasound precludes its routine use and may be used as a complementary tool in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Keywards: Acute Appendictis, RIPASA, Ultrasound.

scholarly journals A comparative study of RIPASA score and modified Alvarado score in diagnosis of acute appendicitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 3937
Author(s):  
Waleed Yusif El Sherpiny
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Negative Appendectomy ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Ripasa Score

Background: Various diagnostic criteria have been described for diagnosing acute appendicitis. Of these, Alvarado score has been the most commonly used. The RIPASA score is a new diagnostic scoring system developed for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and showed higher sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy as compared to Alvarado score. we want to compare prospectively Alvarado and RIPASA score by applying them to patients attending emergency department complaining of right iliac fossa pain that could probably be acute appendicitis.Methods: Patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis were classified according to both Alvarado and RIPASA scoring systems before undergoing surgery. Histopathological examination of the removed appendix was taken as the gold standard for diagnosis of acute appendicitis.Results: Among (90%) patients had histologically confirmed appendicitis. With the cut-off value greater than 7.5 for RIPASA score; sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy  were 88.2%, 14.5%, 73.1%, 32%,and 68% respectively. With the cut-off value greater than 7 for Alvarado score, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy and negative appendectomy rates were 51.2%, 80 %, 91 %, 29%, and 57%, respectively. 87.5% of patients were correctly stratified by RIPASA under higher probability group while only 45% were classified by Alvarado as high probability.Conclusions: RIPASA scoring system showed high sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy in comparison to Alvarado scoring system. So, it can be applied   for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

scholarly journals Foundational Statistical Principles in Medical Research: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, and Negative Predictive Value

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 503
Author(s):  
Thomas F. Monaghan ◽  
Syed N. Rahman ◽  
Christina W. Agudelo ◽  
Alan J. Wein ◽  
Jason M. Lazar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Medical Literature ◽  
Disease Prevalence ◽  
Positive Test Result ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Test Result ◽  
Test Probability

Sensitivity, which denotes the proportion of subjects correctly given a positive assignment out of all subjects who are actually positive for the outcome, indicates how well a test can classify subjects who truly have the outcome of interest. Specificity, which denotes the proportion of subjects correctly given a negative assignment out of all subjects who are actually negative for the outcome, indicates how well a test can classify subjects who truly do not have the outcome of interest. Positive predictive value reflects the proportion of subjects with a positive test result who truly have the outcome of interest. Negative predictive value reflects the proportion of subjects with a negative test result who truly do not have the outcome of interest. Sensitivity and specificity are inversely related, wherein one increases as the other decreases, but are generally considered stable for a given test, whereas positive and negative predictive values do inherently vary with pre-test probability (e.g., changes in population disease prevalence). This article will further detail the concepts of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values using a recent real-world example from the medical literature.

Diagnostic accuracy of monofilament test to detect diabetic neuropathy

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-25
Author(s):  
Sujan Shrestha ◽  
Mamen Prasad Gorhaly ◽  
Manil Ratna Bajracharya
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Perception Threshold ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Vibration Perception ◽  
Monofilament Test

Background Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a significant independent risk factor for diabetic foot, and an effective screening instrument is required to diagnose DPN early to prevent future ulceration and amputation. This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of monofilament test to detect diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir hospital, Mahabouddha, Kathmandu from February 2016 to January 2017. A total of 96 diabetic patients attending inpatient and outpatient Department were selected. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy was assessed by measurement of loss of protective sensation (LOPS) by monofilament test and compared with vibration perception threshold by standard biothesiometer. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of monofilament test were calculated. Results The prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy was 26%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of monofilament test were found to be 92.0%, 95.8%, 88.5% and 97.1% respectively. There was strong association between LOPS by monofilament and vibration perception threshold by biothesiometer. Conclusion This study showed a strong diagnostic accuracy of monofilament test to detect DPN when compared with biothesiometer. As monofilament test is a cheap, easily available, and portable, it can be used in the periphery where biothesiometer is not available.  

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF GRAY SCALE ULTRASONOGRAPHY VERSUS COLOR DOPPLER IN SUSPECTED CASES OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tahir Iqbal ◽  
Muhammad Usman Shahid ◽  
Ishfaq Ahmad Shad ◽  
Shahzad Karim Bhatti ◽  
Syed Amir Gilani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Color Doppler ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Gray Scale ◽  
Versus Color ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: A common surgical emergency is acute appendicitis. Various diagnostic tools are available to diagnosis acute appendicitis. Radiological investigations play an important role in making accurate and early diagnosis and thus preventing morbidity associated with the disease. OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of gray scale ultrasonography versus color Doppler in suspected cases of acute appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was carried in the department of Radiology of Mayo Hospital, Lahore. A total of 75 patients were enrolled of age 18-40 years, both genders who were suspected cases of acute appendicitis. All patients underwent baseline investigations along with gray scale ultrasonography and color Doppler. All patients were subjected to surgery to confirm the diagnosis and findings were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 23.25 ±10.55 and mean transverse diameter of appendix was 8.37 ±3.39. There were 62.7% males and 37.3%females. Findings of gray scale ultrasonography and color Doppler were then correlated with surgical findings to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of these modalities. The results revealed that gray scale ultrasonography sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy was 92.7%, 94.32%, 95%, 91.4% and 93.3% respectively, whereas color Doppler had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of 97.7%, 93.9%, 95.3%, 97% and 96% respectively. Diagnostic accuracy of both modalities together was 98.6%. CONCLUSION: Color Doppler has better diagnostic accuracy than gray scale ultrasonography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis and the combination of both modalities yields diagnostic accuracy that is similar to gold standard.

scholarly journals Comparison of RMI 3 and RMI 4 in pre-operative evaluation of ovarian masses

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 3602
Author(s):  
Badugu Rao Bahadur ◽  
Gangadhara Rao Koneru ◽  
Prabha Devi Kodey ◽  
Jyothi Melam
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Clinical Approach ◽  
Ovarian Mass ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Operative Evaluation ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Final Confirmation

Background: To differentiate ovarian mass as benign or malignant could change clinical approach. Finding a screening and diagnostic method for ovarian cancer is challenging due to high mortality and insidious symptoms. Risk malignancy index (RMI) has the advantage of rapid and exact triage of patients with ovarian mass.Methods: Prospective study carried for 2 years at NRI Medical College and General Hospital, Chinakakani, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh, India. 79 patients with ovarian mass were investigated and risk malignancy index (RMI-3 and RMI-4) calculated. Final confirmation was done based on histopathological report. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated for RMI 3 and RMI 4 taking histopathology as control and comparison was done.Results: (n=79); 50 (63.29%) cases were benign and 29 (36.70%) were malignant based on histopathology. RMI 4 is more sensitive (68.96%) than RMI 3 (62.06%), but RMI 3 is more specific (94%) than RMI 4 (92%).The positive predictive value of RMI-3 and RMI-4 were 85.71%  and 83.33% respectively. The negative predictive value for RMI-4 and RMI-3 were 83.63% and 81.03% respectively.Conclusions: With increasing age, chance of malignancy increases. RMI 4 was more sensitive than RMI-3, however less specific than RMI 3 in differentiating benign and malignant tumors. The positive predictive value is slightly more for RMI 3, than RMI 4. Negative predictive value is slightly more for RMI 4, than RMI 3. 

Συγκριτική μελέτη της μορφομετρίας κατά τον κλασικό ακτινολογικό έλεγχο (MRX) και της μορφομετρίας με χρήση απορροφησιομετρίας (VFA) στον καθορισμό σπονδυλικών παραμορφώσεων σε οστεοπορωτικούς ασθενείς μετά από κυφοπλαστική

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ευστάθιος Δράμπαλος
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Σκοπός: H εφαρμογή για πρώτη φορά διεθνώς της μορφομετρίας της σπονδυλικής στήλης με χρήση απορροφησιομετρίας (VFA) σε ασθενείς με κυφοπλαστική. Αναλύονται τα πλεονεκτήματα και μειονεκτήματα της μεθόδου, ελέγχεται η αξιοπιστία της και συγκρίνεται με την μορφομετρία κατά τον κλασσικό ακτινολογικό έλεγχο (ΜRΧ) στην εκτίμηση των σπονδυλικών παραμορφώσεων στους συγκεκριμένους ασθενείς.Υλικά και Μέθοδος: Πραγματοποιήθηκαν μετρήσεις σε 42 ασθενείς με κυφοπλαστική λόγω οστεοπορωτικών σπονδυλικών καταγμάτων και αναλύθηκαν οι σπόνδυλοι από τον T4 μέχρι τον L4 με την VFA και την MRX. Μετρήθηκαν το πρόσθιο (ha), μέσο (hm) και οπίσθιο (hp) ύψος του σπονδυλικού σώματος και προσδιορίσθηκαν οι λόγοι ha/hp και hm/hp. Αναλύθηκαν για την VFA η συμφωνία αποτελεσμάτων του ίδιου παρατηρητή (IOA) και η συμφωνία αποτελεσμάτων μεταξύ ανεξάρτητων παρατηρητών (INA) για τους λόγους ha/hp και hm/hp καθώς και για την μέθοδο Genant σε επίπεδο σπονδύλου, ‘περιοχής της σπονδυλικής στήλης (θωρακική/ΘΜΣΣ ή οσφυϊκή/ΟΜΣΣ), σε επίπεδο ‘γειτονικών προς την κυφοπλαστική σπονδύλων’, και σε επίπεδο ‘σπονδύλων με κυφοπλαστική’. Σε κάθε επίπεδο χρησιμοποιήθηκε η μέση τιμή ha/hp και hm/hp. Στη συνέχεια, αναλύσαμε την συμφωνία μεταξύ VFA και MRX στον καθορισμό των λόγων ha/hp και hm/hp καθώς και μετά την διχοτόμηση των λόγων ha/hp περί της τιμής όριο που συνήθως χρησιμοποιείται για τον καθορισμό ενός κατάγματος. Αποτελέσματα: Οι IOA και INA για τους λόγους ha/hp και hm/hp στην VFA ήταν ‘σχεδόν τέλεια’ σε όλα τα επίπεδα (ICC 0.94-0.98). Η εφαρμογή της μεθόδου Genant κατά την VFA ανέδειξε επίσης ‘σχεδόν τέλεια’ INA (ICC=0.833). Η ανάλυση σε επίπεδο σπονδύλου έδειξε ‘σχεδόν τέλεια’ συμφωνία μεταξύ VFA και MRX για τον λόγο ha/hp [intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC=0.85], και ‘ισχυρή συμφωνία’ για τον λόγο hm/hp (ICC=0.78). Για τον λόγο ha/hp η συμφωνία ήταν ‘σχεδόν τέλεια’ τόσο στην ΘΜΣΣ (ICC=0.82) όσο και στην ΟΜΣΣ (ICC=0.87), ενώ για τον λόγο hm/hp η συμφωνία ήταν ‘ισχυρή’ στην ΘΜΣΣ (ICC=0.75) και ‘σχεδόν τέλεια’ στην ΟΜΣΣ (ICC=0.80). Η συμφωνία ήταν εξίσου ‘σχεδόν τέλεια’ σε επίπεδο ‘σπονδύλων με κυφοπλαστική’ (ICC=0.83) όσο και σε επίπεδο ‘γειτονικών προς την κυφοπλαστική σπονδύλων’ (ICC=0.80) για τον λόγο ha/hp. Όταν οι λόγοι ha/hp μετατράπηκαν σε κατάγματα (ναι ή όχι κάταγμα) χρησιμοποιώντας διαφορετικές τιμές κατώφλι για την διάγνωση κατάγματος (λόγοι ha/hp 0.75, 0.80 και 0.85) η συμφωνία μεταξύ των μεθόδων ήταν λιγότερο καλή, από μέτρια έως ουσιώδης (κ 0.52-0.63 στην ΟΜΣΣ και 0.53-0.66 στην ΘΜΣΣ). Χρησιμοποιώντας την κατάταξη Genant οι διαφορές στην ταξινόμηση των σπονδύλων ήταν περισσότερο προς την κατεύθυνση της MRX με 32 αναγνωρισμένα κατάγματα μόνο από την MRX και μόνο 5 μόνο από την VFA. Στη μελέτη αυτή, με επιπολασμό σφηνοειδών σπονδυλικών καταγμάτων 9.3%, οι δείκτες ακρίβειας sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) και negative predictive value (NPV) υπολογίστηκαν σε 0.522, 0.97, 0.87 και 0.92 αντίστοιχα. Συμπεράσματα: Η εφαρμογή της VFA σε ασθενείς με κυφοπλαστική έχει υψηλή επαναληψιμότητα και αναπαραγωγιμότητα. Η συμφωνία μεταξύ VFA και MRX στην εκτίμηση των λόγων ha/hp και hm/hm ήταν από ‘ισχυρή’ έως ‘σχεδόν τέλεια’ ανάλογα με το επίπεδο εξέτασης. Η συμφωνία στην αναγνώριση των σπονδυλικών καταγμάτων ήταν μέτρια. Οι διαφορές ήταν περισσότερο προς την κατεύθυνση της MRX. Η υψηλή τιμή του δείκτη NPV της VFA στους ασθενείς με κυφοπλαστική, δείχνει ότι η μέθοδος θα μπορούσε να χρησιμοποιηθεί για τον εντοπισμό αυτών που χρήζουν περαιτέρω ακτινολογικού ελέγχου.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document