scholarly journals Comparison of RMI 3 and RMI 4 in pre-operative evaluation of ovarian masses

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 3602
Author(s):  
Badugu Rao Bahadur ◽  
Gangadhara Rao Koneru ◽  
Prabha Devi Kodey ◽  
Jyothi Melam
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Clinical Approach ◽  
Ovarian Mass ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Operative Evaluation ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Final Confirmation

Background: To differentiate ovarian mass as benign or malignant could change clinical approach. Finding a screening and diagnostic method for ovarian cancer is challenging due to high mortality and insidious symptoms. Risk malignancy index (RMI) has the advantage of rapid and exact triage of patients with ovarian mass.Methods: Prospective study carried for 2 years at NRI Medical College and General Hospital, Chinakakani, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh, India. 79 patients with ovarian mass were investigated and risk malignancy index (RMI-3 and RMI-4) calculated. Final confirmation was done based on histopathological report. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated for RMI 3 and RMI 4 taking histopathology as control and comparison was done.Results: (n=79); 50 (63.29%) cases were benign and 29 (36.70%) were malignant based on histopathology. RMI 4 is more sensitive (68.96%) than RMI 3 (62.06%), but RMI 3 is more specific (94%) than RMI 4 (92%).The positive predictive value of RMI-3 and RMI-4 were 85.71%  and 83.33% respectively. The negative predictive value for RMI-4 and RMI-3 were 83.63% and 81.03% respectively.Conclusions: With increasing age, chance of malignancy increases. RMI 4 was more sensitive than RMI-3, however less specific than RMI 3 in differentiating benign and malignant tumors. The positive predictive value is slightly more for RMI 3, than RMI 4. Negative predictive value is slightly more for RMI 4, than RMI 3. 

scholarly journals Accuracy of High Resolution Sonography in Diagnosis of Fibroadenosis Compared with Histopathological Diagnosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-142
Author(s):  
Mashah Binte Amin ◽  
Tarana Yasmin ◽  
Khaleda Parvin Rekha ◽  
Rushaida Haque Leeba ◽  
Nasima Akhter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Linear Array ◽  
Histopathological Diagnosis ◽  
Fibrocystic Disease ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Breast Condition ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Test Result

Background: Fibrocystic breast condition is a common, non-cancerous condition that affects premenopausal woman between 20 and 50 years of age. Because of non-specific nature of clinical presentation, diagnosis is not that easy. Linear array sonography has been helpful for detection of mammary dysplasia.Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of superficial sonography in the diagnosis of chronic cystic mastitis.Materials and Methods: This study was carried out in department of Radiology & Imaging of Enam Medical College and Hospital during June 2013 to October 2017. Sonography was done in 1350 women suspected of having fibrocystic disease. Among them FNAC was done only in 1020 cases. Ultrasonographic findings and histopathological reports were analyzed using SPSS 13.0.Results: According to our study the sensitivity of superficial sonography was 92.4%, specificity 88.8%, positive predictive value 93.8%, negative predictive value 86.4% and accuracy 91% in the diagnosis of fibrocystic changes.Conclusion: With the validity test result, it can be concluded that high frequency sonography provides an accurate diagnosis of fibroadenosis.J Enam Med Col 2018; 8(3): 139-143

scholarly journals Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Spinal Tumors and Its Comparison with Histopathological Findings

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-166
Author(s):  
Gopal Chandra Saha ◽  
Prodip Kumar Biswas ◽  
Md Motlabur Rahman ◽  
Mohammed Shahadat Hossain ◽  
Mohammad Zaid Hossain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Spinal Tumor ◽  
Spinal Tumour ◽  
Spinal Tumors ◽  
Histopathological Findings ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Diagnostic Usefulness ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the diagnostic usefulness of MRI in evaluation of spinal tumors.Methodology: This cross-sectional study was carried out in Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka. The data was collected from July 2011 to June 2013 and total 51 patients were included in the study. Data was collected from MRI diagnosed spinal tumors who attended at Radiology and Imaging department of DMCH from OPD and indoor patients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of MRI for evaluation of spinal tumors were detected.Results: Out of 51 patients 26 (51%) was intradural extramedullary, 13 (25.5%) was extradural and 12 (23.5%) was intramedullary. Distribution of patients according to MR diagnosis. Among the 51 patients 40 were diagnosed spinal tumor and 11 were not spinal tumor by MRI. Among the 40 spinal tumuor diagnosed 12 (23.5%) were schwannoma, 02 (3.9%) were neuro fibroma, 11(21.6%) were meningioma, 07(13.7%) were ependymoma, 05(9.8%) were astrocytoma, 02(3.9%) were metastasis and 1 (2.0%) was osteoblastoma. Out of all cases 40 were diagnosed as spinal tumour by MRI and among them 39 were confirmed by histopathological evaluation. They were true positive. One case was diagnosed as having spinal tumour by MRI but not confirmed by histopathological findings. That was false positive. Out of 11 cases of non tumour which were confirmed by MRI, 3 were confirmed as spinal tumour and 8 were non-tumour by histopathological findings. They were false negative and true negative respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of the MRI in the diagnosis of spinal tumour were 92.86%, 88.89%, 97.50%, 72.73% and 92.15% respectively.Conclusion: The present study conducted to assess the diagnostic usefulness of MRI in evaluation of spinal tumors among the Bangladeshi population. Study revealed high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the MRI in the diagnosis of spinal tumour. MRI should be the initial procedure in the evaluation of suspected tumors of the spine.J Dhaka Medical College, Vol. 26, No.2, October, 2017, Page 162-166

scholarly journals Interleukin 21 as a diagnostic marker of rheumatoid arthritis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (08) ◽  
pp. 1229-1232
Author(s):  
Khadija Kiran ◽  
Amtul Huda ◽  
Zuhair Bhatti
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Marker ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
P Value ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

To investigate the role of IL-21 as diagnostic marker in diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Setting: Department of Physiology and Orthopedic Gujranwala Medical College, Gujranwala. Period: October 2017 to October 2018 in one year duration. Materials and Methods: A total of 150 patients were included in the study, main variables assessed in this study were positive predictive value negative predictive value, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of IL-21 in diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. SPSS version 23 was used to analyze the data. P value less than or equal to 0.05 was taken as significant. Study was started after permission from hospital ethical committee and patients were informed in detail about disease and procedure to be done. Non probability consecutive sampling was used. Results: The estimated sensitivity was 93.6%. The estimated specificity was 50%. Positive predictive value was 96.3% and negative predictive value was 35.7%. The overall accuracy was 90.6% for diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis. Conclusion: IL-21 induces MMP3 in rheumatoid arthritis patients, identification of IL-21 from synovium of patients indicates the presence of rheumatoid arthritis. We observed 90.6% diagnostic accuracy of IL-21 for rheumatoid patients taking RA factor as gold standard of diagnostic tool.

scholarly journals Comparision of ultrasonographic diagnosis with ‘Tzanakis’ Score in acute appendicitis

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-12
Author(s):  
Ashish Prasad Rajbhandari ◽  
Nischal Dhakal ◽  
Robin Koirala ◽  
Manohar Lal Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
College Teaching ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Ultrasonographic Diagnosis ◽  
Ultrasound Findings ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Better Than

Introduction: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common acute surgical abdominal conditions requiring surgery. Ever since the inflamed appendix was demonstrated in the 1980’s by Ultrasonography, it has been used as an aid to clinically diagnose acute appendicitis. Tzanakis scoring system is a combination of clinical examination, Ultrasonography and inflammatory markers. Methods: A retrospective non-randomized observational study was conducted from April 2014 to March 2015 on all cases of acute appendicitis, which underwent preoperative ultrasound before appendectomy (open/laparoscopic) at the Department of surgery, Nepal Medical College Teaching Hospital. Ultrasound findings and Tzanaki score were compared in the cases. No studies could be found in literature comparing ultrasound diagnosis with Tzanaki score in appendicitis. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of ultrasound were 73%, 50%, 95% and 12% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of Tzanaki were 87%, 50%, 96% and 23% respectively. Tzanaki score is better than ultrasound alone as a diagnostic test for acute appendicitis. Conclusion: Tzanaki score is better than ultrasound in diagnosis of acute appendicitis.  

scholarly journals Foundational Statistical Principles in Medical Research: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, and Negative Predictive Value

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 503
Author(s):  
Thomas F. Monaghan ◽  
Syed N. Rahman ◽  
Christina W. Agudelo ◽  
Alan J. Wein ◽  
Jason M. Lazar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Medical Literature ◽  
Disease Prevalence ◽  
Positive Test Result ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Test Result ◽  
Test Probability

Sensitivity, which denotes the proportion of subjects correctly given a positive assignment out of all subjects who are actually positive for the outcome, indicates how well a test can classify subjects who truly have the outcome of interest. Specificity, which denotes the proportion of subjects correctly given a negative assignment out of all subjects who are actually negative for the outcome, indicates how well a test can classify subjects who truly do not have the outcome of interest. Positive predictive value reflects the proportion of subjects with a positive test result who truly have the outcome of interest. Negative predictive value reflects the proportion of subjects with a negative test result who truly do not have the outcome of interest. Sensitivity and specificity are inversely related, wherein one increases as the other decreases, but are generally considered stable for a given test, whereas positive and negative predictive values do inherently vary with pre-test probability (e.g., changes in population disease prevalence). This article will further detail the concepts of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values using a recent real-world example from the medical literature.

Diagnostic accuracy of monofilament test to detect diabetic neuropathy

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-25
Author(s):  
Sujan Shrestha ◽  
Mamen Prasad Gorhaly ◽  
Manil Ratna Bajracharya
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Perception Threshold ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Vibration Perception ◽  
Monofilament Test

Background Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a significant independent risk factor for diabetic foot, and an effective screening instrument is required to diagnose DPN early to prevent future ulceration and amputation. This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of monofilament test to detect diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir hospital, Mahabouddha, Kathmandu from February 2016 to January 2017. A total of 96 diabetic patients attending inpatient and outpatient Department were selected. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy was assessed by measurement of loss of protective sensation (LOPS) by monofilament test and compared with vibration perception threshold by standard biothesiometer. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of monofilament test were calculated. Results The prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy was 26%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of monofilament test were found to be 92.0%, 95.8%, 88.5% and 97.1% respectively. There was strong association between LOPS by monofilament and vibration perception threshold by biothesiometer. Conclusion This study showed a strong diagnostic accuracy of monofilament test to detect DPN when compared with biothesiometer. As monofilament test is a cheap, easily available, and portable, it can be used in the periphery where biothesiometer is not available.  

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF GRAY SCALE ULTRASONOGRAPHY VERSUS COLOR DOPPLER IN SUSPECTED CASES OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tahir Iqbal ◽  
Muhammad Usman Shahid ◽  
Ishfaq Ahmad Shad ◽  
Shahzad Karim Bhatti ◽  
Syed Amir Gilani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Color Doppler ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Gray Scale ◽  
Versus Color ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: A common surgical emergency is acute appendicitis. Various diagnostic tools are available to diagnosis acute appendicitis. Radiological investigations play an important role in making accurate and early diagnosis and thus preventing morbidity associated with the disease. OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of gray scale ultrasonography versus color Doppler in suspected cases of acute appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was carried in the department of Radiology of Mayo Hospital, Lahore. A total of 75 patients were enrolled of age 18-40 years, both genders who were suspected cases of acute appendicitis. All patients underwent baseline investigations along with gray scale ultrasonography and color Doppler. All patients were subjected to surgery to confirm the diagnosis and findings were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 23.25 ±10.55 and mean transverse diameter of appendix was 8.37 ±3.39. There were 62.7% males and 37.3%females. Findings of gray scale ultrasonography and color Doppler were then correlated with surgical findings to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of these modalities. The results revealed that gray scale ultrasonography sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy was 92.7%, 94.32%, 95%, 91.4% and 93.3% respectively, whereas color Doppler had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of 97.7%, 93.9%, 95.3%, 97% and 96% respectively. Diagnostic accuracy of both modalities together was 98.6%. CONCLUSION: Color Doppler has better diagnostic accuracy than gray scale ultrasonography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis and the combination of both modalities yields diagnostic accuracy that is similar to gold standard.

scholarly journals A study of quantitative and qualitative analysis of standardized speech samples in persons suffering from dysarthria due to various neurological disorder

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 1527
Author(s):  
Somesh Maheshwari
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Normal Population ◽  
Software Tool ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Subject Variability ◽  
Ataxic Dysarthria ◽  
The Central Nervous System

Background: Dysarthria is manifested as a disorder of movement, it is important to recognize that sensori-motor integration (with tactile, proprioceptive, and auditory feed-back representing the crucial sensory components) is essential to speech motor control, from this standpoint, most or all dysarthria localized to the central nervous system should be thought of as sensori-motor rather than simply motor disturbances.Methods: This non-interventional, cross-sectional comparative, observational study, conducted in 100 study subjects (50 cases and 50 controls) from March 2016 to February 2017 at MGM medical college and MY hospital Indore, MP, India.Results: The mean age of normal population was 53 years and that of dysarthric population was 55 years. Among the dysarthric group, there were 10 cases of ataxic dysarthria, 23 cases of spastic dysarthria, and 9 cases of hypo kinetic dysarthria. There were 20 cases of mild dysarthria 19 cases of moderate dysarthria and 10 cases of severe dysarthria. In ataxic dysarthria, pitch break was found in 6 out of 10 subjects. It was found that there is negative predictive value 93.33%, and positive predictive value, 77.14% in spastic dysarthria and negative predictive value, 83.33% and positive predictive value, 90.90% in ataxic, whereas negative predictive value, 85.71% and positive predictive value, 95.34% in hypo kinetic dysarthria.  Conclusions: Different types of dysarthria when analyzed with software tool after extracting pitch and formants showed specific patterns. These patterns correlated with the clinical diagnosis. And Pattern recognition of different dysarthria will help to identify the types of dysarthria in scientific way and prevent inter-subject variability.

Συγκριτική μελέτη της μορφομετρίας κατά τον κλασικό ακτινολογικό έλεγχο (MRX) και της μορφομετρίας με χρήση απορροφησιομετρίας (VFA) στον καθορισμό σπονδυλικών παραμορφώσεων σε οστεοπορωτικούς ασθενείς μετά από κυφοπλαστική

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ευστάθιος Δράμπαλος
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Σκοπός: H εφαρμογή για πρώτη φορά διεθνώς της μορφομετρίας της σπονδυλικής στήλης με χρήση απορροφησιομετρίας (VFA) σε ασθενείς με κυφοπλαστική. Αναλύονται τα πλεονεκτήματα και μειονεκτήματα της μεθόδου, ελέγχεται η αξιοπιστία της και συγκρίνεται με την μορφομετρία κατά τον κλασσικό ακτινολογικό έλεγχο (ΜRΧ) στην εκτίμηση των σπονδυλικών παραμορφώσεων στους συγκεκριμένους ασθενείς.Υλικά και Μέθοδος: Πραγματοποιήθηκαν μετρήσεις σε 42 ασθενείς με κυφοπλαστική λόγω οστεοπορωτικών σπονδυλικών καταγμάτων και αναλύθηκαν οι σπόνδυλοι από τον T4 μέχρι τον L4 με την VFA και την MRX. Μετρήθηκαν το πρόσθιο (ha), μέσο (hm) και οπίσθιο (hp) ύψος του σπονδυλικού σώματος και προσδιορίσθηκαν οι λόγοι ha/hp και hm/hp. Αναλύθηκαν για την VFA η συμφωνία αποτελεσμάτων του ίδιου παρατηρητή (IOA) και η συμφωνία αποτελεσμάτων μεταξύ ανεξάρτητων παρατηρητών (INA) για τους λόγους ha/hp και hm/hp καθώς και για την μέθοδο Genant σε επίπεδο σπονδύλου, ‘περιοχής της σπονδυλικής στήλης (θωρακική/ΘΜΣΣ ή οσφυϊκή/ΟΜΣΣ), σε επίπεδο ‘γειτονικών προς την κυφοπλαστική σπονδύλων’, και σε επίπεδο ‘σπονδύλων με κυφοπλαστική’. Σε κάθε επίπεδο χρησιμοποιήθηκε η μέση τιμή ha/hp και hm/hp. Στη συνέχεια, αναλύσαμε την συμφωνία μεταξύ VFA και MRX στον καθορισμό των λόγων ha/hp και hm/hp καθώς και μετά την διχοτόμηση των λόγων ha/hp περί της τιμής όριο που συνήθως χρησιμοποιείται για τον καθορισμό ενός κατάγματος. Αποτελέσματα: Οι IOA και INA για τους λόγους ha/hp και hm/hp στην VFA ήταν ‘σχεδόν τέλεια’ σε όλα τα επίπεδα (ICC 0.94-0.98). Η εφαρμογή της μεθόδου Genant κατά την VFA ανέδειξε επίσης ‘σχεδόν τέλεια’ INA (ICC=0.833). Η ανάλυση σε επίπεδο σπονδύλου έδειξε ‘σχεδόν τέλεια’ συμφωνία μεταξύ VFA και MRX για τον λόγο ha/hp [intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC=0.85], και ‘ισχυρή συμφωνία’ για τον λόγο hm/hp (ICC=0.78). Για τον λόγο ha/hp η συμφωνία ήταν ‘σχεδόν τέλεια’ τόσο στην ΘΜΣΣ (ICC=0.82) όσο και στην ΟΜΣΣ (ICC=0.87), ενώ για τον λόγο hm/hp η συμφωνία ήταν ‘ισχυρή’ στην ΘΜΣΣ (ICC=0.75) και ‘σχεδόν τέλεια’ στην ΟΜΣΣ (ICC=0.80). Η συμφωνία ήταν εξίσου ‘σχεδόν τέλεια’ σε επίπεδο ‘σπονδύλων με κυφοπλαστική’ (ICC=0.83) όσο και σε επίπεδο ‘γειτονικών προς την κυφοπλαστική σπονδύλων’ (ICC=0.80) για τον λόγο ha/hp. Όταν οι λόγοι ha/hp μετατράπηκαν σε κατάγματα (ναι ή όχι κάταγμα) χρησιμοποιώντας διαφορετικές τιμές κατώφλι για την διάγνωση κατάγματος (λόγοι ha/hp 0.75, 0.80 και 0.85) η συμφωνία μεταξύ των μεθόδων ήταν λιγότερο καλή, από μέτρια έως ουσιώδης (κ 0.52-0.63 στην ΟΜΣΣ και 0.53-0.66 στην ΘΜΣΣ). Χρησιμοποιώντας την κατάταξη Genant οι διαφορές στην ταξινόμηση των σπονδύλων ήταν περισσότερο προς την κατεύθυνση της MRX με 32 αναγνωρισμένα κατάγματα μόνο από την MRX και μόνο 5 μόνο από την VFA. Στη μελέτη αυτή, με επιπολασμό σφηνοειδών σπονδυλικών καταγμάτων 9.3%, οι δείκτες ακρίβειας sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) και negative predictive value (NPV) υπολογίστηκαν σε 0.522, 0.97, 0.87 και 0.92 αντίστοιχα. Συμπεράσματα: Η εφαρμογή της VFA σε ασθενείς με κυφοπλαστική έχει υψηλή επαναληψιμότητα και αναπαραγωγιμότητα. Η συμφωνία μεταξύ VFA και MRX στην εκτίμηση των λόγων ha/hp και hm/hm ήταν από ‘ισχυρή’ έως ‘σχεδόν τέλεια’ ανάλογα με το επίπεδο εξέτασης. Η συμφωνία στην αναγνώριση των σπονδυλικών καταγμάτων ήταν μέτρια. Οι διαφορές ήταν περισσότερο προς την κατεύθυνση της MRX. Η υψηλή τιμή του δείκτη NPV της VFA στους ασθενείς με κυφοπλαστική, δείχνει ότι η μέθοδος θα μπορούσε να χρησιμοποιηθεί για τον εντοπισμό αυτών που χρήζουν περαιτέρω ακτινολογικού ελέγχου.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document