scholarly journals Caesarean section defects may affect pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Junrong Diao ◽  
Ge Gao ◽  
Yunshan Zhang ◽  
Xinyan Wang ◽  
Yinfeng Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Implantation Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Biochemical Pregnancy ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background Caesarean section rates are rising worldwide. One adverse effect of caesarean section reported in some studies is an increased risk of subfertility. Only a few studies have assessed the relationship between the previous mode of delivery and in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) reproductive outcomes. In this study, we primarily investigated the impact of a history of caesarean section with or without defects on IVF/ICSI-ET outcomes compared to a vaginal delivery history. Methods This retrospective study included 834 women who had a IVF or ICSI treatment at our centre between 2015 and 2019 with a delivery history. In total, 401 women with a previous vaginal delivery (VD) were assigned to the VD group, and 433 women with a history of delivery by caesarean section were included, among whom 359 had a caesarean scar (CS) without a defect and were assigned to the CS group and 74 had a caesarean section defect (CSD) and were assigned to the CSD group. Baseline characteristics of the three groups were compared and analysed. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the association between clinical outcomes and different delivery modes. Results There were no significant differences in the live birth rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, mean implantation rate or abnormal pregnancy rate between the CS and VD groups However, the live birth rate and mean implantation rate in the CSD group were significantly lower than those in the VD group (21.6 vs 36.4%, adjusted OR 0.50 [0.27–0.9]; 0.25 ± 0.39 vs 0.35 ± 0.41, adjusted OR 0.90 [0.81–0.99]). Among women aged ≤ 35 years, the subgroup analyses showed that the live birth rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and mean implantation rate in the CSD group were all significantly lower than those in the VD group (21.4 vs 45.8%, adjusted OR 0.35[0.15 ~ 0.85]; 38.1 vs 59.8%, adjusted OR 0.52[0.24–0.82]; 31.0 vs 55.6%, adjusted OR 0.43[0.19–0.92]; 0.27 ± 0.43 vs 0.43 ± 0.43, adjusted OR 0.85[0.43 ± 0.43]). For women older than 35 years, there was no statistically significant difference in any pregnancy outcome among the three groups. Conclusions This study suggested that the existence of a CS without a defect does not decrease the live birth rate after IVF or ICSI compared with a previous VD. However, the presence of a CSD in women, especially young women (age ≤ 35 years), significantly impaired the chances of subsequent pregnancy.

scholarly journals Comparison of pregnancy outcomes using a time-lapse monitoring system for embryo incubation versus a conventional incubator in in vitro fertilization: an age-stratification analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pattraporn Chera-aree ◽  
Isarin Thanaboonyawat ◽  
Benjawan Thokha ◽  
Pitak Laokirkkiat
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Implantation Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Vitro Fertilization

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization with embryo transfer between embryos cultured in a time-lapse monitoring system (TLS) and those cultured in a conventional incubator (CI).Methods: The medical records of 250 fertilized embryos from 141 patients undergoing infertility treatment with assisted reproductive technology at a tertiary hospital from June 2018 to May 2020 were reviewed. The study population was divided into TLS and CI groups at a 1 to 1 ratio (125 embryos per group). The primary outcome was the live birth rate. Results: The TLS group had a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate (46.4% vs. 27.2%, p=0.002), implantation rate (27.1% vs. 12.0%, p=0.004), and live birth rate (32% vs. 18.4%, p=0.013) than the CI group. Furthermore, subgroup analyses of the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate in the different age groups favored the TLS group. However, this difference only reached statistical significance in the live birth rate in women aged over 40 years and the clinical pregnancy rate in women aged 35–40 years (p=0.048 and p=0.031, respectively). The miscarriage rate, cleavage rate, and blastocyst rate were comparable.Conclusion: TLS application improved the live birth rate, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rate, particularly in the advanced age group in this study, while the other reproductive outcomes were comparable. Large randomized controlled trials are needed to further explore the ramifications of these findings, especially in different age groups.

scholarly journals Laser-assisted Hatching Improves Live Birth Rate of Vitrified-warmed Blastocyst Transfer Cycles: a Case Control Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shui-Ying Ma ◽  
Lian-Jie Li ◽  
Hui Zhao ◽  
Cheng Li ◽  
Haibin Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Monozygotic Twin ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Blastocyst Transfer ◽  
Assisted Hatching ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Biochemical Pregnancy

Abstract Background Assisted hatching is a widely accepted technique in assisted reproductive technology, however, it’s efficiency remains controversial and lack of data on safety. The aim of this study was to assess whether laser-assisted hatching improves clinical pregnancy results of vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles.Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of 4143 vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles from October 2014 to December 2015 at a single, university-based hospital. Cases involving blastocysts that survived after warming were divided into the assisted hatching (AH) group (n=1975) and non-AH group (n=2168). In the AH group, laser AH was performed for the warmed blastocysts before transfer. In the non-AH group, the warmed blastocysts were transferred without AH. The primary outcome was live birth rate after survived vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers.Results No significant differences in age, endometrial preparation regimen, number of embryos transferred, or blastocyst developmental stage were found between the two groups (P>0.05). The biochemical pregnancy (67.0% vs. 63.6%; P=0.023; odds ratio [OR], 1.177; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.032–1.344), clinical pregnancy (59.2% vs. 56.0%; P=0.041; OR, 1.163; 95% CI, 1.024–1.321), live birth (48.6% vs. 45.4%; P=0.041; OR, 1.160; 95% CI, 1.022–1.316), and implantation (52.1% vs. 49.3%; P=0.039) rates of the AH group were significantly higher than those of the non-AH group. The early miscarriage (17.1% vs. 17.8%; P=0.674), monozygotic twin (1.5% vs. 0.90%; P=0.214), and birth defect (3.1% vs. 3.6%; P=0.571) rates were similar in both groups. Conclusions In vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles, laser AH is associated with high clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. The benefits of AH outweigh its drawbacks, which include prolonged in vitro procedure, thermal damage, and higher workload in the in vitro fertilization laboratory.Trial registration: retrospectively registered

scholarly journals Live Birth Rate of Fresh Embryo Transfer with GnRH Agonist Long Protocol is Higher Than Frozen Embryo Transfer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Ding ◽  
Jingwei Yang ◽  
Lan Li ◽  
Na Yang ◽  
Ling Lan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Pregnancy Loss ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Implantation Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Fresh Embryo Transfer ◽  
Long Protocol

Abstract Background: Along with progress in embryo cryopreservation, especially in vitrification has made freeze all strategy more acceptable. Some studies found comparable or higher live birth rate with frozen embryo transfer (FET) than with fresh embryo transfer（ET）in gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol. But there were no reports about live birth rate differences between fresh ET and FET with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) long protocol. The aim of this study is to analyze whether patients benefit from freeze all strategy in GnRH-a protocol from real-world data.Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study, in which women undergoing fresh ET or FET with GnRH-a long protocol at Chongqing Reproductive and Genetics Institute from January 2016 to December 2018 were evaluated. The primary outcome was live birth rate. The secondary outcomes were implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, pregnancy loss and ectopic pregnancy rate.Results: A total of 7,814 patients met inclusion criteria, implementing 5,216 fresh ET cycles and 2,598 FET cycles, respectively. The demographic characteristics of the patients were significantly different between two groups, except BMI. After controlling for a broad range of potential confounders (including age, infertility duration, BMI, AMH, no. of oocytes retrieved and no. of available embryos), multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that there was no significant difference in terms of clinical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate and pregnancy loss rate between two groups (all P>0.05). However, the implantation rate and live birth rate of fresh ET group were significantly higher than FET group (P<0.001 and P=0.012, respectively).Conclusion: Compared to FET, fresh ET following GnRH-a long protocol could lead to higher implantation rate and live birth rate in infertile patients underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF). The freeze all strategy should be individualized and made with caution especially with GnRH-a long protocol.

O-107 Searching for the optimal number of oocytes to reach a life birth following in vitro fertilization: a systematic review with meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Sermondade ◽  
C Sonigo ◽  
M Pasquier ◽  
N Yata-Ahdad ◽  
E Fraison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth Rate ◽  
Continuous Increase ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Study question To investigate the relationship between the number of oocytes and both the live birth rate after fresh embryo transfer and the cumulative live birth rate. Summary answer Above a 15-oocyte threshold, live birth rate (LBR) following fresh transfer plateaus, whereas a continuous increase in cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) is observed. What is known already Several lines of evidence indicate that number of oocytes represents a key point for in vitro fertilization (IVF) success. However, consensus is lacking regarding the optimal number of oocytes for expecting a live birth. This is a key question because it might impact the way practitioners initiate and adjust COS regimens. Study design, size, duration A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between January 01, 2004, and August 31, 2019 using the search terms: “(intracytoplasmic sperm injection or icsi or ivf or in vitro fertilization or fertility preservation)” and “(oocyte and number)” and “(live birth)”. Participants/materials, setting, methods Two independent reviewers carried out study selection, quality assessment using the adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scales, bias assessment using ROBIN-1 tools, and data extraction according to Cochrane methods. Independent analyses were performed according to the outcome (LBR and CLBR). The mean-weighted threshold of optimal oocyte number was estimated from documented thresholds, followed by a one-stage meta-analysis on articles with documented or estimable relative risks. Main results and the role of chance After reviewing 843 records, 64 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. A total of 36 studies were available for quantitative syntheses. Twenty-one and 18 studies were included in the meta-analyses evaluating the relationship between the number of retrieved oocytes and LBR or CLBR, respectively. Given the limited number of investigations considering mature oocytes, association between the number of metaphase II oocytes and IVF outcomes could not be investigated. Concerning LBR, 7 (35.0%) studies reported a plateau effect, corresponding to a weighted mean of 14.4 oocytes. The pooled dose-response association between the number of oocytes and LBR showed a non-linear relationship, with a plateau beyond 15 oocytes. For CLBR, 4 (19.0%) studies showed a plateau effect, corresponding to a weighted mean of 19.3 oocytes. The meta-analysis of the relationship between the number of oocytes and CLBR found a non-linear relationship, with a continuous increase in CLBR, including for high oocyte yields. Limitations, reasons for caution Statistical models show a high degree of deviance, especially for high numbers of oocytes. Further investigations are needed to assess the generalization of those results to frozen mature oocytes, especially in a fertility preservation context, and to evaluate the impact of female age. Wider implications of the findings Above a 15-oocyte threshold, LBR following fresh transfer plateaus, suggesting that the freeze-all strategy should probably be performed. In contrast, the continuous increase in CLBR suggests that high numbers of oocytes could be offered to improve the chances of cumulative live births, after evaluating the benefit–risk balance. Trial registration number Not applicable

scholarly journals Reproductive Outcomes of Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Following In-Vitro Fertilization — A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 01 (04) ◽  
pp. 193-201
Author(s):  
I-Ferne Tan ◽  
Audrey J. R. Lim ◽  
Inthrani R. Indran ◽  
Michael S. Kramer ◽  
Eu-Leong Yong
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Ovarian Hyperstimulation ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Ivf Outcomes ◽  
Ovarian Syndrome

Background: Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a common cause of infertility in women. In-vitro fertilization (IVF) is required in 20–30% of women with PCOS trying to conceive. This is associated with increased risk of multiple gestation and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Improvements in IVF techniques, safety standards, and the increased use of frozen embryos in recent years have lead to improved outcomes for women with PCOS. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare these outcomes with women without PCOS. Search Methods: A search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of clinical trials, and Scopus databases for all articles published until November 16th, 2017 identified 21 studies comparing IVF outcomes in PCOS and non-PCOS women. Inclusion criteria were Rotterdam criteria PCOS, comparable IVF regimes, immediate IVF outcomes, and pregnancy outcomes. Studies were excluded if the control group included any PCOS criteria, donor oocytes, or in-vitro maturation. Outcomes: No difference was observed in live birth rate per cycle in women with vs. without PCOS (RR [Formula: see text] 1.01 [0.89, 1.16]; [Formula: see text] 82%), but the live birth rate per first cycle in PCOS cycles (RR [Formula: see text] 0.93 [0.88, 0.99]) was slightly lower. There was also no difference in the clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.02 [0.89, 1.17]) or biochemical pregnancy rate (RR 1.03 [0.99, 1.08]) observed between the two groups. PCOS was associated with a significantly higher number of oocytes retrieved (mean difference [Formula: see text] 3.6; 95% CI [2.8, 4.4]), risk of miscarriage (RR 2.90 [2.09, 4.02]), and risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (RR 3.42 [2.28, 5.13]) per cycle. Conclusion: Despite a widespread perception of poor reproductive potential, women with PCOS experience IVF outcomes similar to those without PCOS. Although there is a slightly lower live birth rate during their first stimulation cycle, success rates are similar after multiple cycles. PCOS is associated with a higher risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Further studies are required to mitigate this risk.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document