scholarly journals Dispensation of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications in patients receiving opioid agonist therapy; a national prospective cohort study in Norway from 2015 to 2017

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jørn Henrik Vold ◽  
Christer Aas ◽  
Svetlana Skurtveit ◽  
Ingvild Odsbu ◽  
Fatemeh Chalabianloo ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jørn Henrik Vold ◽  
Svetlana Skurtveit ◽  
Christer Aas ◽  
Kjell Arne Johansson ◽  
Lars Thore Fadnes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jørn Henrik Vold ◽  
Christer Aas ◽  
Svetlana Skurtveit ◽  
Ingvild Odsbu ◽  
Fatemeh Chalabianloo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background It is estimated that up to a third of patients on opioid agonist therapy (OAT) have attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Treatment by ADHD medication, including a centrally acting stimulant (CAS) or atomoxetine is one of the essential approaches. This study evaluates the use of dispensed ADHD medications in the Norwegian OAT population in the period from 2015 to 2017. Types and doses of ADHD medications, co-dispensations of other potentially addictive drugs like benzodiazepines, z-hypnotics, gabapentinoids, and non-OAT opioids, as well as direct-acting antivirals (DAA) against hepatitis C infection, are investigated. Methods Information about all dispensed ADHD medication, OAT opioids, and the defined potentially addictive drugs were recorded from the Norwegian Prescription Database. Dispensation rates, the types, and the doses of dispensed ADHD medications were estimated by summarizing the number of dispensations, and the dispensed doses. Logistic regression analyses were employed to assess the associations between ADHD medication, and OAT opioid use, and dispensations of other potentially addictive drugs and DAAs against hepatitis C infection. Results A total of 9,235 OAT patients were included. The proportion of patients who were dispensed ADHD medication increased from 3.5% to 4.6% throughout the study period. The three most dispensed CAS were short- and intermediate-acting methylphenidate (55%), lisdexamphetamine (24%), and dexamphetamine (17%) in 2017. Buprenorphine, rather than methadone, as OAT opioid (adjusted odds ratio: 1.6, CI: 1.2-2.1) was associated with being dispensed ADHD medication. Among patients who received CAS and OAT opioids each calendar year, the dispensed doses of methylphenidate increased from 63 mg/day in 2015 to 76 mg/day in 2017 (p = 0.01). Eighty-five of 142 patients receiving ADHD medications were also dispensed other addictive drugs concomitantly in 2017. Similar results were found in 2015 and 2016. Conclusion Co-prescription of ADHD medications was low among patients on OAT in Norway, considering a high prevalence of ADHD in this patient group. On the other hand, concurrent dispensations of multiple addictive drugs were common in this population. Understanding the underlying reasons for such prescribing is essential, and research on how to optimize ADHD medication of patients with ADHD receiving OAT is needed.


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. e036860
Author(s):  
Jørn Henrik Vold ◽  
Christer Aas ◽  
Svetlana Skurtveit ◽  
Ingvild Odsbu ◽  
Fatemeh Chalabianloo ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo compare the use of benzodiazepines, z-hypnotics, gabapentinoids, opioids and centrally acting stimulants (CAS) among patients who had received opioid agonist therapy (OAT) in Norway and Sweden during the period 2015 - 2017.DesignA register-based prospective cohort study using information about dispensed drugs from the Norwegian Prescription Database and Swedish Prescribed Drug Register.SettingPatients who were dispensed OAT opioids from pharmacies.ParticipantsA total of 7176 Norwegian and 3591 Swedish patients on OAT were included.Outcome measuresThe number and frequency of potentially addictive drugs dispensed were calculated for the two countries. The mean daily doses of dispensed benzodiazepines and z-hypnotics were summarised by calculating benzodiazepines in diazepam equivalents and z-hypnotics in zopiclone equivalents.ResultsIn 2017, 46% of patients in Norway, and 15% in Sweden, were dispensed a benzodiazepine. Moreover, 14% in Norway and 26% in Sweden received z-hypnotics. Gabapentinoids were dispensed to 10% of patients in Norway and 19% of patients in Sweden. In Norway, 6% and 12% of the patients received strong and weak non-OAT opioids, respectively, whereas in Sweden 10% were dispensed strong non-OAT opioids and 5% weak non-OAT opioids . CAS were dispensed to 4% in Norway and 18% in Sweden. The mean daily doses of benzodiazepines were 16 and 17 mg diazepam equivalents in Norway and Sweden, respectively. For z-hypnotics, the mean daily dose was 8 mg zopiclone equivalents in both countries. ‘Benzodiazepines and z-hypnotics’ was the most dispensed drug combination in 2017. Similar results were found in 2015 and 2016.ConclusionsNearly half of those patients who were dispensed an OAT opioid in Norway and Sweden were dispensed potentially addictive drugs. The differences identified between Norway and Sweden might be related to differences in eligibility guidelines and restrictions with respect to OAT.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (8) ◽  
pp. 702-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Søren Dalsgaard ◽  
James F Leckman ◽  
Preben Bo Mortensen ◽  
Helena Skyt Nielsen ◽  
Marianne Simonsen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document