scholarly journals Bone impaction grafting with trabecular metal augments in large defects in young patients: unravelling a new perspective in surgical technique

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Basilio De la Torre-Escuredo ◽  
Eva Gómez-García ◽  
Salvador Álvarez-Villar ◽  
Julia Bujan ◽  
Miguel A. Ortega
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Impaction Grafting ◽  
Trabecular Metal ◽  
New Perspective ◽  
Bone Impaction Grafting

scholarly journals Bone Impaction Grafting with Trabecular Metal Augments in Large Defects in Young Patients: Unravelling A New Perspective in Surgical Technique

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Basilio De la Torre-Escurero ◽  
Eva Gómez-González ◽  
Slavador Álvarez-Villar ◽  
Julia Bujan ◽  
Miguel A Ortega
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Abduction Angle ◽  
Acetabular Reconstruction ◽  
Impaction Grafting ◽  
Trabecular Metal ◽  
Bone Impaction Grafting ◽  
Acetabular Defects

Abstract Background: Acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting in large defects has yielded conflicting results. Methods: This was a retrospective study of a case series of five patients with a young age (≤50 years) at the time of surgery who had large acetabular defects reconstructed by bone impaction grafting and trabecular metal augments. The mean follow-up was 79 months. We describe the surgical technique in detail.Results: Improvement was significant on the WOMAC and SF-36 scales (p < 0.05). The radiographs taken at the last follow-up examination showed no migration of the polyethylene cup (p = 0.31) or differences in the abduction angle (p = 0.27) compared to the radiographs from the immediate postoperative period. One patient presented two dislocation episodes as a complication.Conclusion: The combination of trabecular metal augments with the bone impaction grafting technique in young patients with large acetabular defects provides satisfactory results in the long term and restores the bone stock.

scholarly journals Bone impaction grafting with trabecular metal augments in large defects in young patients: unravelling a new perspective in Surgical Technique

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Basilio De la Torre-Escurero ◽  
Eva Gómez-González ◽  
Slavador Álvarez-Villar ◽  
Julia Bujan ◽  
Miguel A Ortega
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Abduction Angle ◽  
Acetabular Reconstruction ◽  
Impaction Grafting ◽  
Trabecular Metal ◽  
Bone Impaction Grafting ◽  
Acetabular Defects

Abstract Background: Acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting in large defects has yielded conflicting results.Methods: This was a retrospective study of a case series of five patients with a young age (≤50 years) at the time of surgery who had large acetabular defects reconstructed by bone impaction grafting and trabecular metal augments. The mean follow-up was 79 months. We describe the surgical technique in detail.Results: Improvement was significant on the WOMAC and SF-36 scales (p < 0.05). The radiographs taken at the last follow-up examination showed no migration of the polyethylene cup (p = 0.31) or differences in the abduction angle (p = 0.27) compared to the radiographs from the immediate postoperative period. One patient presented two dislocation episodes as a complication.Conclusion: The combination of trabecular metal augments with the bone impaction grafting technique in young patients with large acetabular defects provides satisfactory results in the long term and restores the bone stock.

scholarly journals Treatment of Large Acetabular Defects: A Surgical Technique Utilizing Impaction Grafting into a Metallic Mesh

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 242-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Buckup ◽  
Emiliano Alvarez Salinas ◽  
Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle ◽  
Friedrich Boettner
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Impaction Grafting ◽  
Metallic Mesh ◽  
Acetabular Defects

Locally administered bisphosphonate in hip stem revisions using the bone impaction grafting technique: a randomised, placebo-controlled study with DXA and five-year RSA follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-34
Author(s):  
Ola Belfrage ◽  
Magnus Tägil ◽  
Martin Sundberg ◽  
Uldis Kesteris ◽  
Gunnar Flivik
Keyword(s):  
Bone Density ◽  
Femoral Stem ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
First Year ◽  
Allograft Bone ◽  
Impaction Grafting ◽  
Hip Revision ◽  
Grafting Technique ◽  
Bone Impaction Grafting

Background: Bisphosphonates have previously been shown to increase the density of impacted graft bone. In the present study we hypothesise that bisphosphonates also reduce early stem subsidence. We examined the effect of locally applied bisphosphonate to allografts on prosthetic micromotion and bone density in femoral stem revision with impaction grafting. Methods: 37 patients were randomised to either clodronate or saline as local adjunct to the morsellised allograft bone. 24 patients were finally analysed per protocol and evaluated by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) during the first year and with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) for 5 years. Results: There were no significant differences neither in bone density, nor in migratory behaviour between the groups. The femoral stems had subsided 3.6 mm in both groups (p = 0.99) at 5 years and there was no difference as measured over time with mixed models analysis. The clinical outcome was good in both groups. Conclusion: Clodronate as a local addendum to allograft bone in hip revision did not increase bone density or reduce micromotion of the implant.

scholarly journals Surgical Technique: The Capsular Arthroplasty: A Useful But Abandoned Procedure for Young Patients With Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

2012 ◽  
Vol 470 (11) ◽  
pp. 2957-2967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reinhold Ganz ◽  
Theddy Slongo ◽  
Klaus A. Siebenrock ◽  
Luigino Turchetto ◽  
Michael Leunig
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

scholarly journals Proximal Femoral Reconstructions with Bone Impaction Grafting and Metal Mesh

2009 ◽  
Vol 467 (9) ◽  
pp. 2325-2334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martín A. Buttaro ◽  
Fernando Comba ◽  
Francisco Piccaluga
Keyword(s):  
Impaction Grafting ◽  
Metal Mesh ◽  
Bone Impaction Grafting

Good implant survival after acetabular revision with extensive impaction bone grafting and uncemented components

2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (2) ◽  
pp. 198-204
Author(s):  
Rico Perlbach ◽  
Lars Palm ◽  
Maziar Mohaddes ◽  
Ingemar Ivarsson ◽  
Jörg Schilcher
Keyword(s):  
Acetabular Revision ◽  
Impaction Grafting ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Bone Contact ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Bone Impaction Grafting

Aims This single-centre observational study aimed to describe the results of extensive bone impaction grafting of the whole acetabular cavity in combination with an uncemented component in acetabular revisions performed in a standardized manner since 1993. Methods Between 1993 and 2013, 370 patients with a median age of 72 years (interquartile range (IQR) 63 to 79 years) underwent acetabular revision surgery. Of these, 229 were more than ten years following surgery and 137 were more than 15 years. All revisions were performed with extensive use of morcellized allograft firmly impacted into the entire acetabular cavity, followed by insertion of an uncemented component with supplementary screw fixation. All types of reoperation were captured using review of radiographs and medical charts, combined with data from the local surgical register and the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Results Among patients with possible follow-up of ten and 15 years, 152 and 72 patients remained alive without revision of the acetabular component. The number of deaths was 61 and 50, respectively. Of those who died, six patients in each group had a reoperation performed before death. The number of patients with a reoperation was 22 for those with ten-year follow-up and 21 for those with 15 years of follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier implant survival rate for aseptic loosening among all 370 patients in the cohort was 96.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 94.1 to 98.5) after ten years and 92.8% (95% CI 89.2 to 96.6) after 15 years. Conclusion Extensive bone impaction grafting combined with uncemented revision components appears to be a reliable method with favourable long-term survival. This technique offers the advantage of bone stock restoration and disputes the long-standing perception that uncemented components require > 50% of host bone contact for successful implant survival. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(2):198–204.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document