scholarly journals Obligations of low income countries in ensuring equity in global health financing

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
John Barugahare ◽  
Reidar K. Lie
Keyword(s):  
Global Health ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Health Financing ◽  
Low Income Countries

Health system reconstitution syndrome: an often misunderstood phenomenon in global health practice

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 618-624
Author(s):  
Anatole Manzi ◽  
Alyssa Ierardo ◽  
Jean Claude Mugunga ◽  
Cate Oswald ◽  
Patrick Ulysse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Global Health ◽  
Health System ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Program Implementation ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
Building Blocks ◽  
Health Systems Strengthening ◽  
Low Income Countries ◽  
Global Movement ◽  
Active Implementation

Abstract The beginning of the 21st century was marked by the new definition and framework of health systems strengthening (HSS). The global movement to improve access to high-quality care garnered new resources to design and implement comprehensive HSS programs. In this effort, billions of dollars flowed from novel mechanisms such as The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria; Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance; and several bilateral funders. However, poor health outcomes, particularly in low-income countries, raise questions about the effectiveness of HSS program implementation. While several evaluation projects focus on the ultimate impact of HSS programs, little is known about the short- and mid-term reactions occurring throughout the active implementation of HSS interventions. Using the well-documented WHO framework of six HSS building blocks, we describe the evolution and phases of health system reconstitution syndrome (HSRS), including: (1) quiescent phase, (2) reactive phase, (3) restorative phase and (4) stability phase. We also discuss the implications of HSRS on global health funding, implementation, policy and research. Recognizing signs of HSRS could improve the rigour of HSS program design and minimize premature decisions regarding the progress of HSS interventions.

scholarly journals The contribution of Dutch doctors in Global Health and Tropical Medicine to research in global health in low- and middle-income countries: an exploration of the evidence

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rob Mooij ◽  
Esther MJ Jurgens ◽  
Jeroen van Dillen ◽  
Jelle Stekelenburg
Keyword(s):  
Global Health ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Tropical Medicine ◽  
Low Income Countries ◽  
Global Health Research ◽  
Medical Doctors ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Phd Thesis ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Results from medical research from high-income countries may not apply to low- and middle-income countries. Some expatriate physicians combine clinical duties with research. We present global health research conducted by Dutch medical doctors in Global Health and Tropical Medicine in low- and middle-income countries and explore the value of their research. We included all research conducted in the last 30 years by medical doctors in Global Health and Tropical Medicine in a low- and middle-income country, resulting in a PhD thesis. Articles and co-authors were found through Medline. More than half of the 18 identified PhD theses concerned maternal health and obstetrics, and the majority of the research was conducted in low-income countries, mostly in rural hospitals. Over 70 local co-authors were involved. Different aspects of these studies are discussed.

Global Health Perspective in Sarcomas and Other Rare Cancers

2018 ◽  
pp. 916-924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaia Florou ◽  
Antonio G. Nascimento ◽  
Ashish Gulia ◽  
Gilberto de Lima Lopes
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Multidisciplinary Approach ◽  
Low Income Countries ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Management Guidelines ◽  
Systemic Treatments ◽  
Poor Outcomes

Sarcomas, rare and heterogenous malignancies that comprise less than 1% of all cancers, have poor outcomes in the metastatic and refractory setting. Their management requires a multidisciplinary approach that consists of medical and surgical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and pathologists as well as ancillary support. In addition to systemic treatments, most patients will require surgical resection and radiation therapy, which mandates the use of the latest technologies and specialized expertise. Management guidelines have been developed in high-income countries, but their applicability in low-income countries, where resources may be limited, remains a challenge. In this article, we propose the best possible evidence-based practices specifically for income-constrained settings to overcome this challenge. In addition, we review the different methods that can be used in low-income countries to access new and expensive treatments, which often times carry prohibitive costs for these areas.

Master of Public Health Concentrations in Global Health in 2020: Preparing Culturally Competent Professionals to Address Health Disparities in the Context of Globalization

2020 ◽  
pp. 152483992091354
Author(s):  
Kathryn H. Jacobsen ◽  
Helen A. Zeraye ◽  
Michael S. Bisesi ◽  
Meredith Gartin ◽  
Rebecca Malouin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Social Justice ◽  
Health Disparities ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Cultural Knowledge ◽  
Public Health Workforce ◽  
Low Income Countries ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Master Of Public Health

During the 2019-2020 academic year, 37 (17%) of 223 Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH) accredited or applicant schools and programs of public health offered Master of Public Health (MPH) degrees with concentrations in general global health. Concentration-specific competencies build on the foundational competencies required for all MPH students enrolled in CEPH-accredited programs. The most popular global health competencies focus on agencies and organizations, ethics and human rights, program management, social and environmental determinants of health, the global burden of disease, collaboration and partnerships, and cultural competency. There is significant overlap between the current concentration competencies and the ones recommended by the Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health in 2018. The online program descriptions for MPH concentrations in global health feature four key themes: globalization, low-income countries, social justice and equity, and culture and diversity. (1) Most programs emphasize transnational health issues and the effects of globalization on health in countries of all income levels. (2) Some programs have a special focus on preparation for serving low-income countries and other disadvantaged populations, such as refugees. (3) Most programs emphasize the social justice and equity issues underlying local and global health disparities. (4) Most programs promote development of the cultural knowledge, awareness, and skills required for serving diverse populations effectively as rising leaders in the international, national, or local public health workforce. Global health MPH programs prepare students for public health practice in resource-limited settings in their home communities as well as internationally.

A Comparison of the Expectations and Experiences of Medical Students From High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Countries Participating in Global Health Clinical Electives

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Peluso ◽  
Adam Rodman ◽  
Douglas A. Mata ◽  
Anne T. Kellett ◽  
Susan van Schalkwyk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Low Income Countries

scholarly journals Reinforcing locally led solutions for universal health coverage: a logic model with applications in Benin, Namibia and Uganda

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. e004273
Author(s):  
Joël Arthur Kiendrébéogo ◽  
Andrea Thoumi ◽  
Keith Mangam ◽  
Cheickna Touré ◽  
Seyni Mbaye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Global Health ◽  
International Development ◽  
Universal Health Coverage ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Development Assistance ◽  
Health Financing ◽  
Health Coverage ◽  
Global Health Community ◽  
Health Community ◽  
Universal Health

Development assistance for health programmes is often characterised as donor-led models with minimal country ownership and limited sustainability. This article presents new ways for low-income and middle-income countries to gain more control of their development assistance programming as they move towards universal health coverage (UHC). We base our findings on the experience of the African Collaborative for Health Financing Solutions (ACS), an innovative US Agency for International Development-funded project. The ACS project stems from the premise that the global health community can more effectively support UHC processes in countries if development partners change three long-standing paradigms: (1) time-limited projects to enhancing long-lasting processes, (2) fly-in/fly-out development support to leveraging and strengthening local and regional expertise and (3) static knowledge creation to supporting practical and co-developed resources that enhance learning and capture implementation experience. We assume that development partners can facilitate progress towards UHC if interventions follow five action steps, including (1) align to country demand, (2) provide evidence-based and tailored health financing technical support, (3) respond to knowledge and learnings throughout activity design and implementation, (4) foster multi-stakeholder collaboration and ownership and (5) strengthen accountability mechanisms. Since 2017, the ACS project has applied these five action steps in its implementing countries, including Benin, Namibia and Uganda. This article shares with the global health community preliminary achievements of implementing a unique, challenging but promising experience.

scholarly journals Vaccine Equity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shalu Nigam
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Low Income Countries ◽  
Effective Response ◽  
Positive Duties ◽  
Moral Duties ◽  
The Third World ◽  
Vaccine Distribution ◽  
Health Rights

COVID-19 has shown that today the world is more interconnected, yet it is more hierarchical and stratified riddled with disproportionate systemic structural socio-economic inequalities. The global humanitarian disaster has highlighted the despair state of human rights affairs across the planet. It has exposed the supremacy of the neoliberal, nationalist paradigm that is deeply entrenched affecting the poorest of the poor. The pandemic has also indicated how capitalism is eroding democratic values endangering the lives of billions. Today, the high-income countries and the pharmaceutical companies are advancing their strategic interest, whereas the persons in the middle and low-income countries are being deprived of their basic requirements. Inequities in vaccine distribution are obstructing the effective response to the pandemic at the global level. Discrimination in access to the vaccine is adversely affecting the marginalized. This essay argues for respecting human rights as global health justice and suggests for affordable, accessible, and quality vaccination and treatment to all in line with reasoning that health inequalities and cross border issues are morally and ethically troubling and therefore are morally justified. Based on positive duties to create conditions for the availability of health rights for all humans, it argues that no rich country or resourceful persons will be safe until the last person is safe. These moral duties, in turn, generate duties of cooperation and obligations at international and domestic levels to better align with values in line with the principles of global health governance. Leaving a large section of the population in the Third world behind is not going to eliminate the threats of the spread of the epidemic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document