scholarly journals Psychometric properities of the Polish version of clinical learning environment inventory

BMC Nursing ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iwona Bodys-Cupak
Keyword(s):  
Learning Environment ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Clinical Placement ◽  
Clinical Learning ◽  
Clinical Learning Environment ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Life Orientation Test ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha

Abstract Background Clinical experience is a crucial activity for nursing students. The way students` perceive clinical placement exerts an immense influence on the learning process. This study aims to test the psychometric properties of a 19-item version of the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory under Polish clinical conditions. Method For this study, Discriminant validity and Cronbach’s alpha reliabilities were computed. In order to measure content validity, the criterion validity Generalized Self Efficacy Scale and the Life Orientation Test - Revised were used. Results Cronbach’s Alpha for the Clinical Facilitator Support of Learning Scale and the Satisfaction with Clinical Placement scale is 0.949 and 0.901, respectively. The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient indicates the existence of a positive correlation between the students’ satisfaction with clinical placement and their [overall] life optimism. Age correlates negatively with perceived teacher support and positively with satisfaction with clinical placement. The sense of self-efficacy correlates negatively with their satisfaction with clinical placement. Clinical Learning Environment Inventory − 19 could be a useful tool to evaluate the quality of the clinical learning process in Polish conditions.

scholarly journals The Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher Scale (CLES+T): psychometric properties measured in the context of postgraduate nursing education

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorota Ozga ◽  
Aleksandra Gutysz-Wojnicka ◽  
Bogumił Lewandowski ◽  
Beata Dobrowolska
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Education ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Nursing Care ◽  
Clinical Learning ◽  
Supervisory Relationship ◽  
Clinical Learning Environment ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha ◽  
Undergraduate Nursing

Abstract Background. The Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher Scale https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HFG5RyQPqY(CLES+T) instrument is internationally used for the evaluation of clinical learning environment in undergraduate nursing education. However, no evidence is available on the possible applications of this instrument in the context of postgraduate nursing education. Purpose. To examine the basic psychometric properties of CLES+T in the context of clinical postgraduate nursing education in Poland.Methods. Study among a sample of 417 nurses participating in the clinical postgraduate training in Poland. Results. Cronbach’s alpha for the total scale was 0.97. A five-factor structure was confirmed in accordance with the assumptions adopted by the authors of the original version of the scale. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the Polish version of the CLES+T subscales ranged from 0.83 (Nursing care on the ward) to 0.95 (The content of supervisory relationship). The mean results for individual subscales ranged from 4.52±0.63 for nursing care on the ward to 4.73±0.45 for role of the nurse teacher. Conclusions. Having shown satisfactory psychometric properties, CLES+T can be considered a useful instrument to assess those elements of clinical learning environment which are important for the assurance of education quality at the postgraduate level.

Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Indonesian Version of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision, and Nurse Teacher Scale (CLES + T)

2021 ◽  
pp. JNM-D-19-00067
Author(s):  
Christine L. Sommers ◽  
Ian Ruddy Mambu ◽  
Lisa McKenna ◽  
Sonia Reisenhofer ◽  
Julie McCaughan
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Exploratory Factor Analysis ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Clinical Learning ◽  
Clinical Learning Environment ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha

Background and PurposeThe purpose of this article is to describe an evaluation of psychometric properties of the Indonesian version of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision, and Nurse Teacher (CLES + T) scale, a scale that measures nursing students' perceptions of their clinical learning environment.MethodsThe CLES + T was completed by 292 nursing students. Inter-item correlations, exploratory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, and evidence of validity were used to examine reliability and validity.ResultsFour factors were extracted that explained 58% of the variance. Cronbach alphas ranged from .86–.95. Wording to describe different titles of supervisors was unclear to some of the participants.ConclusionThe Indonesian version of the CLES + T is a reliable version. More research is needed to clarify some of the wording.

scholarly journals The Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher Scale (CLES+T): psychometric properties measured in the context of postgraduate nursing education

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorota Ozga ◽  
Aleksandra Gutysz-Wojnicka ◽  
Bogumił Lewandowski ◽  
Beata Dobrowolska
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Education ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Nursing Care ◽  
Clinical Learning ◽  
Supervisory Relationship ◽  
Clinical Learning Environment ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha ◽  
Undergraduate Nursing

Abstract Background. The CLES+T instrument is internationally used for evaluation of clinical learning environment in undergraduate nursing education. However, no evidence is available on the possible applications of this instrument in the context of postgraduate nursing education. Purpose. To examine the basic psychometric properties of the CLES+T in the context of clinical postgraduate nursing education in Poland. Methods. Study among a sample of 417 nurses participating in the clinical postgraduate training in Poland. Results. Cronbach’s alpha for the total scale was 0.97. A five-factor structure was confirmed in accordance with the assumptions adopted by the authors of the original version of the scale. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the Polish version of the CLES+T subscales ranged from 0.83 (Nursing care on the ward) to 0.95 (The content of supervisory relationship). The mean results for individual subscales ranged from 4.52±0.63 for nursing care on the ward to 4.73±0.45 for role of the nurse teacher. Conclusions. Having shown satisfactory psychometric properties, CLES+T can be considered a useful instrument to assess those elements of clinical learning environment which are important for the assurance of education quality at the postgraduate level.

scholarly journals The Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher Scale (CLES+T): psychometric properties measured in the context of postgraduate nursing education

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorota Ozga ◽  
Aleksandra Gutysz-Wojnicka ◽  
Bogumił Lewandowski ◽  
Beata Dobrowolska
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Education ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Nursing Care ◽  
Clinical Learning ◽  
Supervisory Relationship ◽  
Clinical Learning Environment ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha ◽  
Undergraduate Nursing

Abstract Background . The Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher Scale ( CLES+T) instrument is internationally used for the evaluation of clinical learning environment in undergraduate nursing education. However, no evidence is available on the possible applications of this instrument in the context of postgraduate nursing education. Purpose . To examine the basic psychometric properties of CLES+T in the context of clinical postgraduate nursing education in Poland. Methods . Study among a sample of 417 nurses participating in the clinical postgraduate training in Poland. Results . Cronbach’s alpha for the total scale was 0.97. A five-factor structure was confirmed in accordance with the assumptions adopted by the authors of the original version of the scale. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the Polish version of the CLES+T subscales ranged from 0.83 ( Nursing care on the ward ) to 0.95 ( The content of supervisory relationship ). The mean results for individual subscales ranged from 4.52±0.63 for nursing care on the ward to 4.73±0.45 for role of the nurse teacher . Conclusions . Having shown satisfactory psychometric properties, CLES+T can be considered a useful instrument to assess those elements of clinical learning environment which are important for the assurance of education quality at the postgraduate level.

scholarly journals Clinical learning environment of nursing and midwifery students in Ghana

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florence Assibi Ziba ◽  
Vida Nyagre Yakong ◽  
Zakari Ali
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Students ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Clinical Experience ◽  
Clinical Placement ◽  
Clinical Learning ◽  
Clinical Learning Environment ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Undergraduate Nursing ◽  
Team Supervision

Abstract Background Data on student experience of the clinical learning environment in Ghana are scarce. We therefore aimed to assess students’ evaluation of the clinical learning environment and the factors that influence their learning experience.Methods This was a cross-sectional survey of 225 undergraduate nursing and midwifery students. We used the Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision + Nurse Teacher (CLES +T) evaluation scale to assess students’ experience of their clinical placement. The association between student demographic characteristics and clinical placement experience was determined using t-test or ANOVA.Results Most of the sampled students were Nurses (67%) and in the third year of training (81%). More students received supervision from a nurse (57%) during clinical placement and team supervision (67%) was the most common during clinical placement. Nursing students were more likely to rate their clinical experience better than midwifery students (p=0.002). Students who had increased contact with private supervisors were also more likely to rate their experience higher (p=0.002). Clinical experience was also rated higher by students who received successful supervision compared to those who had unsuccessful or team supervision (p=0.001).Conclusion Team supervision is high in health facilities where students undertake clinical placement in Ghana. Frequent contact with private supervisor and successful supervision are associated with better rating of clinical experience among Ghanaian undergraduate nursing and midwifery students.

scholarly journals Clinical learning environment of nursing and midwifery students in Ghana

BMC Nursing ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Florence Assibi Ziba ◽  
Vida Nyagre Yakong ◽  
Zakari Ali
Keyword(s):  
Learning Environment ◽  
Clinical Experience ◽  
Learning Experience ◽  
Clinical Placement ◽  
Clinical Learning ◽  
Clinical Learning Environment ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Undergraduate Nursing ◽  
Team Supervision

Abstract Background Data on student experience of the clinical learning environment in Ghana are scarce. We therefore aimed to assess students’ evaluation of the clinical learning environment and the factors that influence their learning experience. Methods This was a cross-sectional survey of 225 undergraduate nursing and midwifery students. We used the Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision + Nurse Teacher (CLES +T) evaluation scale to assess students’ experience of their clinical placement. The association between student demographic characteristics and clinical placement experience was determined using t-test or ANOVA. Results Most of the sampled students were Nurses (67%) and in the third year of training (81%). More students received supervision from a nurse (57%) during clinical placement and team supervision (67%) was the most common during clinical placement. Nursing students were more likely to rate their clinical experience better than midwifery students (p=0.002). Students who had increased contact with private supervisors were also more likely to rate their experience higher (p=0.002). Clinical experience was also rated higher by students who received successful supervision compared to those who had unsuccessful or team supervision (p=0.001). Conclusion Team supervision is high in health facilities where students undertake clinical placement in Ghana. Frequent contact with private supervisor and successful supervision are associated with better rating of clinical experience among Ghanaian undergraduate nursing and midwifery students.

The connection of the clinical learning environment and supervision of nursing students with student satisfaction and future intention to work in clinical placement hospitals

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mª Carmen Rodríguez‐García ◽  
Lorena Gutiérrez‐Puertas ◽  
Genoveva Granados‐Gámez ◽  
Gabriel Aguilera‐Manrique ◽  
Verónica V. Márquez‐Hernández
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Students ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Student Satisfaction ◽  
Clinical Placement ◽  
Clinical Learning ◽  
Clinical Learning Environment ◽  
Future Intention

scholarly journals Clinical learning environment of nursing and midwifery students in Ghana

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florence Assibi Ziba ◽  
Vida Nyagre Yakong ◽  
Zakari Ali
Keyword(s):  
Learning Environment ◽  
Clinical Experience ◽  
Learning Experience ◽  
Clinical Placement ◽  
Clinical Learning ◽  
Clinical Learning Environment ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Undergraduate Nursing ◽  
Team Supervision

Abstract Background: Data on student experience of the clinical learning environment in Ghana are scarce. We therefore aimed to assess students’ evaluation of the clinical learning environment and the factors that influence their learning experience.Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey of 225 undergraduate nursing and midwifery students. We used the Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision + Nurse Teacher (CLES +T) evaluation scale to assess students’ experience of their clinical placement. The association between student demographic characteristics and clinical placement experience was determined using t-test or ANOVA.Results: Most of the sampled students were Nurses (67 %) and in the third year of training (81%). More students received supervision from a nurse (57%) during clinical placement and team supervision (67%) was the most common during clinical placement. Nursing students were more likely to rate their clinical experience better than midwifery students (p=0.002). Students who had increased contact with private supervisors were also more likely to rate their experience higher (p=0.002). Clinical experience was also rated higher by students who received successful supervision compared to those who had unsuccessful or team supervision (p=0.001).Conclusion: Team supervision is high in health facilities where students undertake clinical placement in Ghana. Frequent contact with private supervisor and successful supervision are associated with better rating of clinical experience among Ghanaian undergraduate nursing and midwifery students.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document