scholarly journals Detecting copy number variation in next generation sequencing data from diagnostic gene panels

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashish Kumar Singh ◽  
Maren Fridtjofsen Olsen ◽  
Liss Anne Solberg Lavik ◽  
Trine Vold ◽  
Finn Drabløs ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Detection of copy number variation (CNV) in genes associated with disease is important in genetic diagnostics, and next generation sequencing (NGS) technology provides data that can be used for CNV detection. However, CNV detection based on NGS data is in general not often used in diagnostic labs as the data analysis is challenging, especially with data from targeted gene panels. Wet lab methods like MLPA (MRC Holland) are widely used, but are expensive, time consuming and have gene-specific limitations. Our aim has been to develop a bioinformatic tool for CNV detection from NGS data in medical genetic diagnostic samples. Results Our computational pipeline for detection of CNVs in NGS data from targeted gene panels utilizes coverage depth of the captured regions and calculates a copy number ratio score for each region. This is computed by comparing the mean coverage of the sample with the mean coverage of the same region in other samples, defined as a pool. The pipeline selects pools for comparison dynamically from previously sequenced samples, using the pool with an average coverage depth that is nearest to the one of the samples. A sliding window-based approach is used to analyze each region, where length of sliding window and sliding distance can be chosen dynamically to increase or decrease the resolution. This helps in detecting CNVs in small or partial exons. With this pipeline we have correctly identified the CNVs in 36 positive control samples, with sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 91%. We have detected whole gene level deletion/duplication, single/multi exonic level deletion/duplication, partial exonic deletion and mosaic deletion. Since its implementation in mid-2018 it has proven its diagnostic value with more than 45 CNV findings in routine tests. Conclusions With this pipeline as part of our diagnostic practices it is now possible to detect partial, single or multi-exonic, and intragenic CNVs in all genes in our target panel. This has helped our diagnostic lab to expand the portfolio of genes where we offer CNV detection, which previously was limited by the availability of MLPA kits.

2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (11) ◽  
pp. 2202-2209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Iacocca ◽  
Jian Wang ◽  
Jacqueline S. Dron ◽  
John F. Robinson ◽  
Adam D. McIntyre ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun-Ching Chen ◽  
Fayaz Seifuddin ◽  
Cu Nguyen ◽  
Zhaowei Yang ◽  
Wanqiu Chen ◽  
...  

AbstractCopy number variation (CNV) is a common type of mutation that often drives cancer progression. With advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS), CNVs can be detected in a detailed manner via newly developed computational tools but quality of such CNV calls has not been carefully evaluated. We analyzed CNV calls reported by 6 cutting-edge callers for 91 samples which were derived from the same cancer cell line, prepared and sequenced by varying the following factors: type of tissue sample (Fresh vs. Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded (FFPE)), library DNA amount, tumor purity, sequencing platform (Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS) versus Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES)), and sequencing coverage. We found that callers greatly determined the pattern of CNV calls. Calling quality was drastically impaired by low purity (<50%) and became variable when WES, FFPE, and medium purity (50%-75%) were applied. Effects of low DNA amount and low coverage were relatively minor. Our analysis demonstrates the limitation of benchmarking somatic CNV callers when the real ground truth is not available. Our comprehensive analysis has further characterized each caller with respect to confounding factors and examined the consistency of CNV calls, thereby providing guidelines for conducting somatic CNV analysis.


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 719-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie M Ellingford ◽  
Christopher Campbell ◽  
Stephanie Barton ◽  
Sanjeev Bhaskar ◽  
Saurabh Gupta ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 143 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. A013-A013
Author(s):  
Linda B. Baughn ◽  
Getiria Onsongo ◽  
Matthew Bower ◽  
Christine Henzler ◽  
Kevin A.T. Silverstein ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document