scholarly journals Survival outcomes of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 36,480 cases

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin-Yu Xia ◽  
Qing-Lin Hu ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Wei-Yun Xu ◽  
Xiao-Shi Li
Author(s):  
Lin-Yu Xia ◽  
Qing-Lin Hu ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Wei-Yun Xu ◽  
Xiao-Shi Li

Abstract Background: The survival outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) versus adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remain unclear. Therefore, in this study, a meta-analysis was conducted to analyze current evidence on the survival outcomes of NACT versus ACT in TNBC. Methods: A systematic search was performed on the PubMed and Embase databases to identify relevant articles investigating the survival outcomes of NACT versus ACT in TNBC. Results: A total of nine studies involving 36480 patients met the selection criteria. Among them,10728 (29.41%) received NACT, and 25752 (70.59%) received ACT. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 35% (95% CI = 0.23-0.48). Compared with ACT, the overall survival (OS) of NACT was poor (HR = 1.59; 95%CI = 1.25-2.02; P=0.0001), and there was no significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS) between the two treatments (HR = 0.85; 95%CI = 0.54-1.34; P=0.49). NACT with pCR significantly improved the OS (HR = 0.53; 95%CI = 0.29-0.98; P=0.04) and DFS (HR = 0.52; 95%CI = 0.29-0.94; P=0.03), while the OS (HR = 1.18; 95%CI = 1.09-1.28; P<0.0001) and DFS (HR = 2.36; 95%CI = 1.42-3.89; P=0.0008) of patients with residual disease (RD) following NACT were worse compared to those receiving ACT. Conclusion: These findings suggest that, for TNBC, NACT with pCR is superior to ACT in improving OS and DFS. and it turns to be opposite when patients receiving NACT with RD.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin-Yu Xia ◽  
Qing-Lin Hu ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Wei-Yun Xu ◽  
Xiao-Shi Li

Abstract Background The survival outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NACT) versus adjuvant chemotherapy(ACT) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, a meta-analysis was conducted to analyze current evidence on the survival outcomes of neoadjuvant versus ACT in TNBC. Methods A systematic search of PubMed and Embase databases were done to identify relevant articles investigating the survival outcomes of NACT versus ACT in TNBC. Results A total of nine studies involving 36480 patients met the selection criteria.Of them,10728(29.41%) received NACT, and 25752(70.59%) received ACT.The pathological complete response (pCR) rate is 35% (95% CI = 0.23-0.48). Compared with ACT, the overall survival(OS) of NACT was poor(HR = 1.59; 95%CI = 1.25-2.02; P=0.0001), and there was no significant difference in disease-free survival(DFS) between them(HR = 0.85; 95%CI = 0.54-1.34; P=0.49). NACT with pCR can significantly improve the OS(HR = 0.53; 95%CI = 0.29-0.98; P=0.04) and DFS(HR = 0.52; 95%CI = 0.29-0.94; P=0.03), while the OS(HR = 1.18; 95%CI = 1.09-1.28; P<0.0001) and DFS(HR = 2.36; 95%CI = 1.42-3.89; P=0.0008) of patients with residual disease(RD) following NACT were worse compared with ACT. Conclusion The findings suggest that, for TNBC, Patients receiving NACT with pCR can significantly improve OS and DFS compared with ACT and it turns to be opposite when patients receiving NACT with RD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Fen Fu ◽  
Qing-Xia Chen ◽  
Xiao-Xiao Wang ◽  
Jie Zhang ◽  
Chuan-Gui Song

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12501-e12501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadar Goldvaser ◽  
Domen Ribnikar ◽  
Habeeb Majeed ◽  
Alberto Ocana ◽  
Eitan Amir

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Qiyun Ou ◽  
Yunfang Yu ◽  
Xiaoyun Xiao ◽  
Baoming Luo

1 Background: Previous clinical data suggested that the tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were predictive in breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy; however, clinical relevance has yet to be established. We hypothesized that TILs would be associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) after anthracycline/taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer subtypes. Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were searched until March 2017 for studies that investigated the association of TILs with survival for anthracycline/taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. OS and DFS were combined using random-effects meta-analysis and calculated as combined hazard ratio (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CIs). The PROSPERO registry number is CRD42017072133. Results: Twelve studies comprising 9,023 patients were eligible for analysis. Six were prospective adjuvant trials (n = 7686) and six were retrospective studies (n = 1337). Pooled analysis indicated that high TILs have no significant predictive association in overall population (DFS, HR = 0.87, 95% CI, 0.70 – 1.08; OS, HR = 0.98, 95% CI, 0.89 – 1.07), Luminal A/B (DFS, HR = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.94 – 1.04; OS, HR = 1.01, 95% CI, 0.92 – 1.12), and HER2–positive patients (DFS, HR = 0.84, 95% CI, 0.71 – 1.00; OS, HR = 0.89, 95% CI, 0.77 – 1.02), but were related to improved DFS (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73 – 0.89) and OS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.66 – 0.84) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Additionally, increasing TILs were not significantly associated with reduced risk of relapse in HER2-positive patient through adjuvant trastuzumab (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.93 – 1.01). Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides an evidence that TILs predicts survival to anthracycline/taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC patients and suggests that predictive benefit seemed to be influenced by breast cancer subtypes as well.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document