scholarly journals Efficacy of the Lunch is in the Bag intervention to increase parents’ packing of healthy bag lunches for young children: a cluster-randomized trial in early care and education centers

Author(s):  
Cindy Roberts-Gray ◽  
Margaret E. Briley ◽  
Nalini Ranjit ◽  
Courtney E. Byrd-Williams ◽  
Sara J. Sweitzer ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas H. Clements ◽  
Julie Sarama ◽  
Mary Elaine Spitler ◽  
Alissa A. Lange ◽  
Christopher B. Wolfe

This study employed a cluster randomized trial design to evaluate the effectiveness of a research-based intervention for improving the mathematics education of very young children. This intervention includes the Building Blocks mathematics curriculum, which is structured in research-based learning trajectories, and congruous professional development emphasizing teaching for understanding via learning trajectories and technology. A total of 42 schools serving low-resource communities were randomly selected and randomly assigned to 3 treatment groups using a randomized block design involving 1,375 preschoolers in 106 classrooms. Teachers implemented the intervention with adequate fidelity. Pre- to posttest scores revealed that the children in the Building Blocks group learned more mathematics than the children in the control group (effect size, g = 0.72). Specific components of a measure of the quantity and quality of classroom mathematics environments and teaching partially mediated the treatment effect.


2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 559-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy Roberts-Gray ◽  
Sara J. Sweitzer ◽  
Nalini Ranjit ◽  
Christa Potratz ◽  
Magdalena Rood ◽  
...  

Background. A cluster-randomized trial at 30 early care and education centers (Intervention = 15, waitlist Control = 15) showed the Lunch Is in the Bag intervention increased parents’ packing of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains in their preschool children’s bag lunches (parent–child dyads = 351 Intervention, 282 Control). Purpose. To examine the utility of structuring the trial’s process evaluation to forecast use, sustainability, and readiness of the intervention for wider dissemination and implementation. Method. Pretrial, the research team simulated user experience to forecast use of the intervention. Multiattribute evaluation of user experience measured during the trial assessed use and sustainability of the intervention. Thematic analysis of posttrial interviews with users evaluated sustained use and readiness for wider dissemination. Results. Moderate use was forecast by the research team. Multiattribute evaluation of activity logs, surveys, and observations during the trial indicated use consistent with the forecast except that prevalence of parents reading the newsletters was greater (83% vs. 50%) and hearing their children talk about the classroom was less (4% vs. 50%) than forecast. Early care and education center-level likelihood of sustained use was projected to be near zero. Posttrial interviews indicated use was sustained at zero centers. Discussion. Structuring the efficacy trial’s process evaluation as a progression of assessments of user experience produced generally accurate forecasts of use and sustainability of the intervention at the trial sites. Conclusion. This approach can assist interpretation of trial outcomes, aid decisions about dissemination of the intervention, and contribute to translational science for improving health.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 230-239
Author(s):  
Shaikh I. Ahmad ◽  
Bennett L. Leventhal ◽  
Brittany N. Nielsen ◽  
Stephen P. Hinshaw

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document