scholarly journals Comparison of the outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy versus surgical treatment for elderly (≥70) patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer after propensity score matching

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Baiqiang Dong ◽  
Jin Wang ◽  
Xuan Zhu ◽  
Yuanyuan Chen ◽  
Yujin Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival

Abstract Background The optimal treatment for elderly patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains inconclusive. Previous studies have shown that stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) provides encouraging local control though higher incidence of toxicity in elderly than younger populations. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of SBRT and surgical treatment in elderly patients with clinical stage I-II NSCLC. Methods This retrospective analysis included 205 patients aged ≥70 years with clinical stage I NSCLC who underwent SBRT or surgery at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (Hangzhou, China) from January 2012 to December 2017. A propensity score matching analysis was performed between the two groups. In addition, we compared outcomes and related toxicity in both study arms. Results Each group included 35 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 50.1 (0.8–74.4) months for surgery and 35.5 (11.5–71.4) months for SBRT. The rate of cancer-specific survival was similar between the two treatment arms (p = 0.958). In patients who underwent surgery, the corresponding 3- and 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 85.3 and 81.7%, respectively. In those who received radiotherapy, these rates were 91.3 and 74.9%, respectively. Moreover, the 3- and 5-year locoregional control in patients who underwent surgery were 90.0 and 80.0%, respectively. In those who received radiotherapy, these rates were 91.1 and 84.1%, respectively. Notably, the observed differences in progression-free survival were not statistically significant (p = 0.934). In the surgery group, grade 1–2 complications were observed in eleven patients (31%). One patient died due to perioperative infection within 30 days following surgery. There was no grade 3–5 toxicity observed in the SBRT group. Conclusions The outcomes of surgery and SBRT in elderly patients with early-stage NSCLC were similar.

scholarly journals Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Carbon Ion Radiotherapy and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 176
Author(s):  
Yuhei Miyasaka ◽  
Shuichiro Komatsu ◽  
Takanori Abe ◽  
Nobuteru Kubo ◽  
Naoko Okano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Comparison Study ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Early Stage Nsclc

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Radiotherapy is an essential treatment modality for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the standard treatment for early-stage NSCLC because of its favorable local control (LC) compared to conventional radiotherapy. Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is a kind of external beam radiotherapy characterized by a steeper dose distribution and higher biological effectiveness. Several prospective studies have shown favorable outcomes. However, there is no direct comparison study between CIRT and SBRT to determine their benefits in the management of early-stage NSCLC. Thus, we conducted a retrospective, single-institutional, and contemporaneous comparison study, including propensity score-adjusted analyses, to clarify the differences in oncologic outcomes. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 80.1% in CIRT and 71.6% in SBRT (p = 0.0077). The 3-year LC was 87.7% in the CIRT group and 79.1% in the SBRT group (p = 0.037). Multivariable analyses showed favorable OS and LC in the CIRT group (hazard risk [HR] = 0.41, p = 0.047; HR = 0.30, p = 0.040, respectively). Log-rank tests after propensity score matching and Cox regression analyses using propensity score confirmed these results. These data provided a positive efficacy profile of CIRT for early-stage NSCLC.

scholarly journals Prolonged overall treatment time negatively affects the outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: A propensity score-weighted, single-center analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0253203
Author(s):  
Toshiki Ikawa ◽  
Takahiro Tabuchi ◽  
Koji Konishi ◽  
Masahiro Morimoto ◽  
Takero Hirata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Overall Treatment Time

Previous studies have reported conflicting results for the effect of overall treatment time with stereotactic body radiotherapy on tumor control in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. To examine this effect, we conducted a propensity score-weighted, retrospective, observational study at a single institution. We analyzed the data of 200 patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer who underwent stereotactic body radiotherapy (48 Gy in 4 fractions) at our institution between January 2007 and October 2013. Patients were grouped into consecutive (overall treatment time = 4–5 days, n = 116) or non-consecutive treatment groups (overall treatment time = 6–10 days, n = 84). The outcomes of interest were local control and overall survival. The Cox regression model was used with propensity score and inverse probability of treatment weighting. The median overall treatment times in the consecutive and non-consecutive groups were 4 and 6 days, respectively. The 5-year local control and overall survival rates in the consecutive vs. the non-consecutive group were 86.3 vs. 77.2% and 55.5 vs. 51.8%, respectively. After propensity score weighting, consecutive stereotactic body radiotherapy was associated with positive local control (adjusted hazard ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.14–0.65; p = 0.002) and overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.34–0.91; p = 0.019) benefits. The prolonged overall treatment time of stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment negatively affected the outcomes of patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer treated with the same dose-fractionation regimen, consecutive stereotactic body radiotherapy has a more beneficial effect on tumor control than non-consecutive stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document