scholarly journals Treatment patterns in rheumatoid arthritis patients newly initiated on biologic and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy and enrolled in a North American clinical registry

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip J. Mease ◽  
Scott Stryker ◽  
Mei Liu ◽  
Bob Salim ◽  
Sabrina Rebello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Therapy Initiation ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drug ◽  
Biologic Monotherapy

Abstract Background Understanding the evolving treatment patterns in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is important for rheumatologists to make the best practice decisions and optimize treatment. Here, we describe treatment patterns among patients newly initiated on biologic and/or nonbiologic RA therapy over time after enrollment in the US Corrona RA registry. Methods This was a retrospective, cohort study of adult patients with RA enrolled in the Corrona RA registry. Patients were included in this study if they initiated therapy with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) monotherapy, TNF inhibitor (TNFi) monotherapy, other (non-TNFi) biologic monotherapy, or combination therapy (index therapy); initiated therapy between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2015 (index date), after enrollment in the Corrona RA registry; had at least 6 months of follow-up time after the index date; and had at least one follow-up visit. Time periods of interest were based on the year of index therapy initiation: 2004–2007, 2008–2011, and 2012–2015. Results This study included 8027 patients. csDMARD monotherapy and TNFi + csDMARD combination therapy were the most common index therapies in the registry (39.9% and 44.9%, respectively, in the 2004–2007 period; 38.6% and 38.2%, respectively, in the 2008–2011 period; and 35.2% for both in the 2012–2015 period). At therapy initiation, a higher proportion of patients who initiated other biologics, whether as monotherapies (54.0%) or in combination with csDMARD (49.9%), had high disease activity than those who initiated csDMARD monotherapy (28.4%). For 2012–2015 vs 2004–2007 and 2008–2011 periods, persistence on a given therapy appeared to decrease for the TNFi monotherapy cohort (48.2% vs 64.3% and 52.4%) and other biologic monotherapy cohort (52.3% vs 71.4% and 54.5%) over 12 months; switching from one therapy to another was common in the Corrona RA registry. Conclusions Increased switching from one therapy to another and decreased time on a given therapy was observed in the Corrona RA registry in the 2012–2015 period. This observation is most likely due to the increased availability of additional treatment options and/or the change in clinical focus, particularly the emphasis on achievement of treat-to-target goals of remission or low disease activity along with more aggressive treatment.

scholarly journals Lack of association between CYB5A gene rs1790834 polymorphism and the response to leflunomide in women with rheumatoid arthritis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Łączna ◽  
Damian Malinowski ◽  
Agnieszka Paradowska-Gorycka ◽  
Krzysztof Safranow ◽  
Violetta Dziedziejko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Antirheumatic Drug ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Individual Disease ◽  
Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drug

Abstract Aim Leflunomide is a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug used in therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Previous studies indicated that oestrogens and androgens may affect the response to leflunomide in RA patients. The synthesis of androgens is regulated by cytochrome CYB5A. The aim of this study was to examine the association between the CYB5A gene rs1790834 polymorphism and the response to leflunomide in women with RA. Methods The study included 111 women diagnosed with RA. Leflunomide was administered in monotherapy at a dose of 20 mg/day. All patients underwent a monthly evaluation for 12 months after the initiation of treatment with leflunomide. Results After 12 months of therapy, the changes in individual disease activity parameters, such as: DAS28, ESR, CRP and VAS, were not statistically significantly different between rs1790834 genotypes in the Kruskal–Wallis test. Conclusions The results of our study suggest lack of statistically significant association between the CYB5A gene rs1790834 polymorphism and the response to leflunomide in women with RA.

Effectiveness of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug co-therapy with methotrexate and leflunomide in rituximab-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients: results of a 1-year follow-up study from the CERERRA collaboration

2011 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 374-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katerina Chatzidionysiou ◽  
Elisabeth Lie ◽  
Evgeny Nasonov ◽  
Galina Lukina ◽  
Merete Lund Hetland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Synergistic Effect ◽  
Concomitant Treatment ◽  
Safe Alternative ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
European League Against Rheumatism ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
European League ◽  
Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drug

ObjectivesTo compare the effectiveness and safety of rituximab alone or in combination with either methotrexate or leflunomide.Methods10 European registries submitted anonymised datasets with baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12-month clinical data from patients who started rituximab.Results1195 patients were treated with rituximab plus methotrexate, 177 with rituximab plus leflunomide and 505 with rituximab alone. Significantly more patients achieved a European League Against Rheumatism good response at 6 months when treated with rituximab plus leflunomide (29.1%) compared with rituximab plus methotrexate (21.1%) and rituximab alone (19.3%; p=0.02 and p=0.01, respectively). Similar results were observed at 12 months. Adverse events occurred in 10.2%, 13.2% and 13.9% of patients on rituximab plus leflunomide, rituximab plus methotrexate and rituximab alone, respectively.ConclusionsLeflunomide is an effective and safe alternative to methotrexate as concomitant treatment with rituximab. Slightly better results were obtained by the combination of rituximab and leflunomide than rituximab and methotrexate, raising the possibility of a synergistic effect of leflunomide and rituximab.

Plasma Adiponectin in Patients with Active, Early, and Chronic Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are Steroid- and Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug-Naive Compared with Patients with Osteoarthritis and Controls

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 1885-1891 ◽  
Author(s):  
TRINE BAY LAURBERG ◽  
JAN FRYSTYK ◽  
TORKELL ELLINGSEN ◽  
IB T. HANSEN ◽  
ANETTE JØRGENSEN ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Antirheumatic Drug ◽  
Joint Disease ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Plasma Adiponectin ◽  
Activity Measures ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drug ◽  
Disease Activity Measures

Objective.Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic chronic inflammatory joint disease, whereas osteoarthritis (OA) is a local joint disease with low-level inflammatory activity. The pathogenic role of the adipocytokine adiponectin is largely unknown in these diseases. We hypothesized (1) that plasma adiponectin concentrations differ in healthy controls and patients with early disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naive RA, chronic RA, and OA; (2) that changes in adiponectin are observed during methotrexate (MTX) treatment of chronic RA; and (3) that adiponectin correlates to disease activity measures in RA.Methods.Plasma adiponectin was analyzed with a validated in-house immunoassay. We measured adiponectin in healthy controls (n = 45) and patients with early DMARD-naive RA (n = 40), chronic RA (n = 74), and OA (n = 35). In a subgroup of patients with chronic RA (n = 31), the longitudinal effect of MTX treatment on adiponectin (Week 0 vs Week 28) was investigated.Results.Adiponectin differed significantly between healthy controls (mean 4.8 ± SD 2.7 mg/l) and the 3 groups, with 8.9 ± 4.8 mg/l in early RA, 11.6 ± 5.6 mg/l in chronic RA, and 14.1 ± 6.4 mg/l in OA. Longitudinally, MTX treatment increased adiponectin significantly from 9.7 ± 4.5 mg/l at Week 0 to 11.0 ± 4.5 mg/l at Week 28 in chronic RA. No correlations to disease activity measures were found.Conclusion.Both early DMARD-naive and chronic RA were associated with higher plasma adiponectin compared to healthy controls, but lower plasma adiponectin than OA. Adiponectin increased 13% during MTX treatment. In patients with RA and OA body mass index, age, sex, and disease activity measures failed to explain the findings.

scholarly journals Disease Activity in Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) Naïve Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in A Subset of Karachi Population

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Rheumatoid Factor ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Antirheumatic Drug ◽  
Tender Joint Count ◽  
P Value ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drug ◽  
Activity Variables

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a progressive inflammatory disease affecting the joints with a marked impact upon functional capacity of the patient. The working ability of RA patients can be preserved if the disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy is initiated early in the course of disease. The objective of our study was to compare the disease activity variables in DMARD-naïve seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (SPRA) and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (SNRA) patients and to determine correlations between the disease activity variables in RA. Methods: A cross-sectional study recruited n=90 patients from Rheumatology Clinic from May 2020 to October 2020. The rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide levels (ACCP), erythrocyte sedimentation rates (ESR) were clinically measured. Disease activity variables including the tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) and disease activity score of 28 joints (DAS28) were consistently calculated. Patients were divided into seropositive RA group and seronegative RA group, based on RF and ACCP. Chi squared test and Pearson correlation were applied, p≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: High HAQ-DI and DAS28-ESR scores were found in SPRA than in the SNRA patients and were statistically significant (p=0.000, p=0.054). TJ-28 and SJ-28 counts were higher in SPRA but were not statistically significant. There was a significant correlation of DAS28 with TJ-28 (r=0.816, p-value = 0.000), with SJ-28(r=0.801, p-value = 0.000) and HAQ-DI (r=0.517, p-value = 0.000). Conclusion: Evaluation of inflammatory markers and functional disability was found significant (p=0.000) in determining the disease activity compared to presence of autoantibodies in DMARD naïve RA patients. Keywords: Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drug; Arthritis; Rheumatoid Factor; Autoimmune Diseases.

scholarly journals Inequity in access to bDMARD care and how it influences disease outcomes across countries worldwide: results from the METEOR-registry

2018 ◽  
Vol 77 (10) ◽  
pp. 1413-1420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sytske Anne Bergstra ◽  
Jaime C Branco ◽  
David Vega-Morales ◽  
Karen Salomon-Escoto ◽  
Nimmisha Govind ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Physical Functioning ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Final Visit ◽  
Access To Treatment ◽  
Disease Outcomes ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drug

ObjectiveTo establish in a global setting the relationships between countries’ socioeconomic status (SES), measured biological disease modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD)-usage and disease outcomes. To assess if prescription and reimbursement rules and generic access to medication relates to a countries’ bDMARD-usage.MethodsData on disease activity and drug use from countries that had contributed at least 100 patients were extracted from the METEOR database. Mean disease outcomes of all available patients at the final visit were calculated on a per-country basis. A questionnaire was sent to at least two rheumatologists per country inquiring about DMARD-prices, access to treatment and valid regulations for prescription and reimbursement.ResultsData from 20 379 patients living in 12 different countries showed that countries’ SES was positively associated with measured disease activity (meanDAS28), but not always with physical functioning (HAQ-score). A lower country’s SES, stricter rules for prescription and reimbursement of bDMARDs as well as worse affordability of bDMARDs were associated with lower bDMARD-usage. bDMARD-usage was negatively associated with disease activity (although not with physical functioning), but the association was moderate at best.ConclusionsDisease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis as well as bDMARD-usage varies across countries worldwide. The (negative) relationship between countries’ bDMARD-usage and level of disease activity is complex and under the influence of many factors, including—but not limited to—countries’ SES, affordability of bDMARDs and valid prescription and reimbursement rules for bDMARDs.

AB0315 RETENTION RATE OF ABATACEPT MONOTHERAPY IN AN ITALIAN MULTICENTRIC RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS COHORT

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1456.1-1457
Author(s):  
D. Iacono ◽  
I. Pantano ◽  
D. Birra ◽  
G. Scalise ◽  
M. A. Coscia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Retention Rate ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Physician Global Assessment ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Baseline Activity ◽  
Disease Modifying

Background:EULAR recommendations focus the importance of Methotrexate (MTX) therapy as a key element in the treatment of patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), alone as first line therapy and in combination with biological Disease Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drug (bDMARDs). Abatacept (CTLA4-Ig) in Europe is approved for the treatment of moderate to severe active RA in combination with MTX. Several patients, however, discontinue MTX for intolerance, side effects or contraindications, and real-life data demonstrate how, even in patients receiving therapy with MTX, compliance could be suboptimal. The only data on the use of abatacept in monotherapy come from the ORA-Registry, where a worse performance is observed in monotherapy patients.Objectives:To evaluate a multicenter cohort of RA patients treated with Abatacept in patients underwent combined MTX therapy vs monotherapy.Methods:We retrospectively evaluated RA patients, referring to 2 Italian rheumatology centers, treated with Abatacept monotherapy or in combination with MTX. We compared both persistence in therapy and the rate of remission/low disease activity according to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) between the 2 groups.Results:We enrolled 147 patients, out of them 66 patients were on monotherapy with Abatacept due to intolerance or controindications and 81 in therapy with Abatacept plus MTX. The two cohorts appeared homogeneous in age, gender, disease duration and baseline activity indexes, with the only difference being higher baseline Physician Global assessment (PhGA) values in monotherapy patients. During the follow-up (median duration 24±14 months), the retention rate of Abatacept treatment was 71.2% in MTX patients (median duration 27–15.6 months) and 62.1% in monotherapy patients (median duration 25.2–17.5; p=ns). No differences between the two groups in terms of retention rate, low-disease activity and CDAI remission (log rank p=ns), Breslow p=ns) were detected.Conclusion:In patients with RA with intolerance or contraindication to MTX use, Abatacept monotherapy could be an efficient and safe option even in the long term follow-up.References:[1]Abatacept monotherapy compared with abatacept plus disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis patients: data from the ORA registry.Truchetet ME et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Mar 30;18:72.Disclosure of Interests:DANIELA IACONO Speakers bureau: PFIZER, BRISTOL MAYERS SQUIBB, SANOFI, Ilenia Pantano: None declared, domenico birra: None declared, GIUSEPPE SCALISE: None declared, Melania Alessia Coscia: None declared, VALENTINA MESSINITI: None declared, Gabriella Loi: None declared, Anna Merchionda: None declared, Paolo Moscato: None declared, francesco ciccia Grant/research support from: pfizer, novartis, roche, Consultant of: pfizer, novartis, lilly, abbvie, Speakers bureau: pfizer, novartis, lilly, abbvie

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document