Predictors of unacceptable pain with and without low inflammation over 5 years in early rheumatoid arthritis—an inception cohort study

Objectives Pain is a major symptom in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In early RA, pain is usually due to synovitis, but can also persist despite effective anti-inflammatory treatment. The objective of this study was to investigate the pain course over time and predictors of unacceptable pain and unacceptable pain with low inflammation, in patients with early RA. Methods An inception cohort of 232 patients with early RA, recruited in 1995–2005, was followed in a structured programme for 5 years. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0–100). Unacceptable pain was defined as VAS pain > 40 based on the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) and low inflammation as CRP < 10 mg/l. Baseline predictors of unacceptable pain were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. Results Pain improved significantly during the first 6 months, but then remained basically unchanged. Thirty-four per cent of the patients had unacceptable pain 5 years after inclusion. Baseline predictors of unacceptable pain after 5 years were lower swollen joint counts [odds ratio (OR) 0.71 per standard deviation (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51–0.99)] and higher VAS for pain and global assessment of disease activity. Unacceptable pain with low inflammation after 5 years was negatively associated with anti-CCP antibodies [OR 0.50 (95% CI 0.22–0.98)]. Conclusion Over one third of the patients had unacceptable pain 5 years after inclusion. Lower swollen joint count was associated with unacceptable pain at 5 years. The results may be explained by the positive effects of treatment on pain related to inflammation. Non-inflammatory long-lasting pain appears to be a greater problem in anti-CCP-negative patients.

AB0104 CONCORDANCE BETWEEN THE PHYSICIAN’S AND THE PATIENT’S ASSESSMENT OF DISEASE ACTIVITY IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: RESULTS OF THE AUTODAS-MEAC STUDY AT ONE YEAR

Background:Involving the patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the assessment of their disease may increase their adherence to treatment, improve the disease outcomes and facilitate the application of telehealth. We previously reported an excellent concordance between the Disease Activity Score (DAS-28) performed by physicians and patients at the baseline visit of this prospective study (1).Objectives:To evaluate the persistence of the concordance between the physician’ and the patient’s assessment of disease activity in RA using DAS-28 after one year.Methods:At the baseline visit, patients with RA from 7 Middle Eastern Arab Countries (MEAC) were briefed about DAS-28 by their rheumatologist during a routine consultation and given smartphone access to a video in Arabic language explaining the performance of DAS-28. At 3, 6 and 12 months (± 3 months), the patients were asked to self-report DAS-28, blinded to the physician’s assessment. Concordance between the continuous DAS-28 at each visit was calculated using paired t-test numerically and the Bland-Altman method graphically. Agreement between physician- and patient-DAS categories (remission, low-, moderate- and high disease activity) was calculated at each visit using weighted kappa for category comparison. Weighted kappa of the different agreements were compared over time using their respective confidence intervals (CIs). Predictive factors of positive concordance between physician and patient-DAS were identified using binary logistic regression.Results:The study included 428 patients over a period of three years (2018 to 2020). The mean age of participants was 49.8 years, 82.5% were females, 44.3% had a university degree and the mean disease duration was 11.4 years.At baseline, the average patient-DAS was higher (4.06 (±1.52)) than the physician-DAS (3.97 (±1.52)). The mean difference was -0.09 [95%CI -0.14; -0.04] and most of the pairs were within the limit of agreement in the Bland-Altman graph, indicating a good concordance, particularly in cases of remission.During the study follow-up, 299 patients consulted for visit 2 (69.9% of the total population), 232 for visit 3 (54.2%) and 199 for visit 4 (46.5%). The weighted kappa was 0.80 [95%CI 0.76;0.85] at visit 1 and 0.79 [95%CI 0.72;0.88] at visit 4 (Figure 1 showing kappa for DAS-28, CDAI and SDAI as well). A minor numerical decrease in kappa was observed over time; however, the CIs were overlapping over the four visits and the agreement was considered stable, remaining in the excellent range. At visit 4, a positive concordance between the physician- and the patient-DAS was associated with the profession (lower in blue collar, p=0.001), the educational level (higher in high school and university, p=0.034) and the baseline physician’s DAS (higher in high disease activity, p=0.46).Conclusion:The agreement between the DAS-28 performed by the physician and by the patient was excellent at baseline and remained stable over one year. A positive concordance was associated with the profession, the educational level and the level of disease activity. The present study can help the rheumatologist make informed decisions about the patients who may be suitable for a remote evaluation of their disease activity, that can be of particular interest in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.References:[1]Ziade N, Saad S, al Mashaleh M, et al. Perceptions of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis about Self-Assessment of Disease Activity after Watching an Educational Video: Qualitative Pilot Results from the Auto-DAS in Middle Eastern Arab Countries Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 10).Acknowledgements:The authors would like to acknowledge the patients for participating in the study and the assistants/ students/ nurses who assisted in the data collection: Dr. Fatima Abdul Majeed Al Hawaj, M. Atef Ahmed, M. Mohammad Alhusamiah, Ms Raquel De Guzman, Ms Lina Razzouk.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

POS1405 OPTICAL SPECTRAL TRANSMISSION (HANDSCAN) IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: FIRST DATA ON DIAGNOSTIC VALUE AND ASSOCIATIONS WITH CLINICAL AND ULTRASOUND DISEASE ACTIVITY MARKERS

Background:Valid assessment of disease activity leads to improvement of long-term outcomes in patients with inflammatory arthritis (1). Optical spectral transmission (OST) is a modern diagnostic tool able to assess the blood-specific absorption of light transmitted through a tissue, promising quantification of inflammation in the finger and wrist joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (commercial device: HandScan – Demcon/Hemics, The Netherlands) (2). Even though an increasing number of studies have evaluated diagnostic value of this new technology in RA patients (2,3), no data exist regarding psoriatic arthritis (PsA).Objectives:To examine for the first time the diagnostic value of OST in detecting inflammation in patients with PsA and to evaluate its relationship with disease activity markers and various epidemiological and anthropometric patient characteristics.Methods:OST-Measurements were performed in a group of PsA patients and a group of healthy controls. The difference between OST in the two groups was statistically examined and relationships of OST with clinical (tender / swollen joint counts, disease activity on a visual analogue scale) and serological disease activity markers were evaluated. Moreover, joint ultrasound (US) examinations were performed in a subgroup of PsA patients and OST associations with a Power Doppler- and a Grey Scale-US score were examined. Finally, relationships of OST with various anthropometric and epidemiologic parameters (BMI, hand-size, gender, age) were assessed.Results:We recruited 49 PsA patients [65.3% female; mean age 53.3 years (± 11.8 SD)] and 114 control subjects [77.2% female; mean age 46 years (± 12.8 SD)]. OST was statistically significantly higher in the patient group, compared to the control group [14.95 (12.04 - 17.18, IQR) vs. 10.31 (7.84 – 13.79, IQR); p<0.001]. OST correlated moderately-strongly with both examined US scores (Power Doppler-score: r = 0.5; p = 0.026 and Grey Scale-score: r = 0.52; p = 0.028). Moreover, OST showed a moderate, statistically significant association with C-reactive protein (CRP) (r = 0,298; p = 0,037). Finally, males had significantly higher OST values than females and OST associated moderately-weakly with body mass index (BMI) in the control group (rho = 0.24; p< 0.001).Conclusion:This is the first report of a possible diagnostic value of OST in patients with PsA. OST correlated with ultrasound and serological activity markers and may thus prove to be a useful tool of disease activity assessment, next to well established diagnostic modalities, such as the joint US. Correlations of OST with patient characteristics implicate the need to take also anthropometric and epidemiological patient characteristics into account when interprenting OST results in order to avoid confounding.References:[1]Katchamart W, et al. Systematic monitoring of disease activity using an outcome measure improves outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2010;37:1411–1415.[2]Triantafyllias, et al. Diagnostic value of optical spectral transmission in rheumatoid arthritis: associations with clinical characteristics and comparison with joint ultrasonography. J Rheumatol 2020 1;47(9):1314-1322.[3]Onna M Van, et al. Assessment of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using optical spectral transmission measurements, a non-invasive imaging technique. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:511–518.Disclosure of Interests:Konstantinos Triantafyllias Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, Janssen, Chugai, Stefanie Liverakos: None declared, Claudia Noack: None declared, Andreas Schwarting: None declared

POS0275-HPR CONCORDANCE BETWEEN THE PHYSICIAN’S AND THE NURSE’S ASSESSMENT OF DISEASE ACTIVITY IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS USING DAS-28, CDAI AND SDAI IN SEVEN MIDDLE EASTERN ARAB COUNTRIES

Background:Managing patients with chronic rheumatic diseases is increasingly relying on the collaboration of a multidisciplinary team, including the rheumatology nurse who can aid assessment of disease activity among other healthcare tasks.However, this practice, although common in Europe and North America, is still poorly implemented in the Middle eastern Arab countries (MEAC).Objectives:To evaluate the concordance between the physician’s and the nurse’s assessment of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the MEAC.Methods:During a routine patient visit to one of 9 rheumatology clinics located in 7 Middle Eastern Arab countries, the physician and the rheumatology nurse (who was already working in the clinic) performed the disease activity score 28 (DAS), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) in a blinded manner. The concordance regarding the 3 continuous scores was calculated using paired t-test. The agreement between physician- and nurse-DAS categories (remission, low, moderate and high disease activity) was calculated using weighted kappa for category comparison. Predictive factors of positive concordance between physician- and nurse-DAS were identified using binary logistic regression.Results:The study included 373 patients’ measurements over a period of two years (2018 to 2019). The mean age of the patients was 49.6 years (±28.2), 82.6% were females, and the mean disease duration was 11.3 years (±7.5).The mean physician-DAS was slightly higher (3.97 (±1.52)) than the nurse-DAS (3.90 (±1.54)) (p=0.002), with a mean difference of +0.08 [95%CI 0.03; 0.12] (Table 1). The difference in the DAS individual items, the CDAI and the SDAI were not statistically significant.Table 1.Comparison of the disease activity measures reported by the physician and by the nurse.PhysicianNursep-valueTotal Joint Count4.87 (2.26)5.02 (6.20)0.152Swollen Joint Count2.13 (3.88)2.15 (3.83)0.790Global Assessment3.30 (2.41)3.32 (2.43)0.702DAS-283.97 (1.52)3.90 (1.54)0.002CDAI14.26 (12.53)14.38 (12.59)0.515SDAI21.51 (23.57)21.61 (21.66)0.527When analyzing DAS as a categorical 4-items variable, the agreement between the physician and the nurse was present in 79.36% of the cases (weighted kappa was 0.77 [95%CI 0.73;0.83] which is considered as excellent, and was higher in patients with high disease activity (Figure 1).A positive concordance between the physician- and the nurse-DAS was associated with the country (higher in Egypt, p<0.001) and the status of higher disease activity (p<0.001).Conclusion:The agreement between the DAS-28 performed by the physician and by the nurse was excellent and was associated with the country and a higher disease activity. The present study confirms that the support of a trained nurse for evaluating disease activity in RA is feasible in the Arab countries and may save some valuable time in the clinic, whilst maintaining the quality of care for patients with RA.Figure 1.Agreement between physician- and nurse-DAS categoriesAcknowledgements:The authors would like to acknowledge the patients for participating in the study and the assistants/ students/ nurses who assisted in the data collection: Dr. Fatima Abdul Majeed Al Hawaj, M. Atef Ahmed, M. Mohammad Alhusamiah, Ms Raquel De Guzman, Ms Lina Razzouk.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Recent Advances in Diagnosis and Management of Crohn’s Disease

The initiation of Crohn’s disease, an inflammatory bowel disease, has been primarily associated with crypt inflammation and abscesses, which further progresses towards the development of mucosal lesion and ulcers followed by mucosal edema. Despite many years of research for the confirmatory role of inflammation in this disease, various pathways and diagnosis for this inflammatory cascade is still unrevealed, which in fact is of utmost importance in the assessment of disease activity and for tailoring the therapy. Till now, various histopathological as well as endoscopic examinations has been found to be effectively and accurately assess inflammatory activity, but they are invasive, time consuming and expensive and therefore are unsuitable for routine use. Consequently, the latest research is focusing on various biomarkers of intestinal inflammation and the corresponding biological therapy. So, this chapter will cover the recent advances in diagnosis and pharmacological therapies for the same.