scholarly journals A management model for admission and treatment of pediatric trauma cases

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Raya Tashlizky Madar ◽  
Avishay Goldberg ◽  
Nitza Newman ◽  
Yehezkel Waisman ◽  
David Greenberg ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pediatric trauma, particularly major trauma cases, are often treated in less than optimal facilities by providers who lack training and experience in treating severely injured children. We aimed to develop a management model for admission and treatment of pediatric trauma using the Theory of Constraints (TOC). Methods We conducted interviews with 17 highly experienced policy makers, senior nursing managers and medical managers in pediatrics and trauma. The interviews were analyzed by qualitative methods. The TOC was utilized to identify undesirable effects (UDEs) and core challenges, and to design a focused current reality tree (CRT). Subsequently, a management model for optimal admission and treatment of pediatric trauma was constructed. Results The CRT was illustrated according to 4 identified UDEs focusing on lack of: (1) clear definitions of case manager in pediatric trauma; (2) uniform criteria regarding the appropriate site for admitting pediatric trauma, (3) standard guidelines and protocols for treatment of trauma cases and for training of trauma medical teams; and (4) standard guidelines for evacuating pediatric trauma patients. The management model for treatment and admission of pediatric trauma is based on 3 major elements: human resources, hospital policy concerning the appropriate emergency department (ED) for pediatric trauma patients and clear definitions regarding children and trauma levels. Each of the elements contains components that should be clearly defined in order for a medical center to be designated for admitting and treating pediatric trauma patients. Conclusions Our analysis suggests that the optimal ED for pediatric trauma cases is one with available operating rooms, intensive care beds, an imaging unit, laboratories and equipment suitable for treating children as well as with staff trained to treat children with trauma. To achieve optimal outcomes, medical centers in Israel should be classified according to their trauma treatment capabilities and their ability to treat varied severities of pediatric trauma cases.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Ewy ◽  
Martin Piazza ◽  
Brian Thorp ◽  
Michael Phillips ◽  
Carolyn Quinsey

Author(s):  
Betül Tiryaki Baştuğ

Aims: In this study, we aimed to find the percentage of random pathologies and abdominopelvic region anomalies that are not related to trauma in pediatric patients. Background: An abdominal assessment of an injured child usually involves computed tomography imaging of the abdomen and pelvis (CTAP) to determine the presence and size of injuries. Imaging may accidentally reveal irrelevant findings. Objectives: Although the literature in adults has reviewed the frequency of discovering these random findings, few studies have been identified in the pediatric population. Methods: Data on 142( 38 female, 104 male) patients who underwent CTAP during their trauma evaluation between January 2019 and January 2020 dates were obtained from our level 3 pediatric trauma center trauma records. The records and CTAP images were examined retrospectively for extra traumatic pathologies and anomalies. Results: 67 patients (47%) had 81 incidental findings. There were 17 clinically significant random findings. No potential tumors were found in this population. Conclusion: Pediatric trauma CTAP reveals random findings. For further evaluation, incidental findings should be indicated in the discharge summaries.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. e000181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian A Maung ◽  
Robert D Becher ◽  
Kevin M Schuster ◽  
Kimberly A Davis

2009 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 681-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn Hutchings ◽  
Oluwarantimi Atijosan ◽  
Chris Burgess ◽  
Keith Willett

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. e12-e17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawn R. Gilbert ◽  
Paul A. MacLennan ◽  
Ian Backstrom ◽  
Aaron Creek ◽  
Jeffrey Sawyer

1991 ◽  
Vol XXXV (6) ◽  
pp. 350
Author(s):  
K. J. KEMPER ◽  
M. S. BENSON ◽  
M. J. BISHOP

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document