Reflections on the Concomitants of the Restrictive Visitation Policy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Ubuntu Perspective

Caregiving is a prominent concept in the Ubuntu philosophy, and caring and visitation of the sick is regarded as an example of Ubuntu. The restrictive visitation policy adopted in the hospitals during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected the exhibition of this concept among patients, nurses, and families. The narrative inquiry was used to explore the reflections of the participants on the impact caused by the non-visitation policy experienced during the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa. The narrative inquiry approach allowed the participants to tell their story as it is unique to them. The study used purposive sampling technique to select five participants for the webinar. Three themes emerged from the narrated stories which are 1) moral anguish of the caregivers; 2) mental health instability, and 3) erosion of trust in health care practitioners (HCPs). The non-visitation hospital policy was intended to reduce the danger of spreading COVID-19 within and outside the hospital; however, the care provided was devoid of the values of Ubuntu such as mutual respect, relational, responsibility, reciprocity, and interconnectedness. In retrospect, a case-by-case application of the policy would reduce the non-desirable effect of the policy on the patients, nurses, and patients' family members.

Use of a smartphone app to inform healthcare workers of hospital policy during a pandemic such as COVID-19: A mixed methods observational study

Objective To evaluate the use of a COVID-19 app containing relevant information for healthcare workers (HCWs) in hospitals and to determine user experience. Methods A smartphone app (Firstline) was adapted to exclusively contain local COVID-19 policy documents and treatment protocols. This COVID-19 app was offered to all HCWs of a 900-bed tertiary care hospital. App use was evaluated with user analytics and user experience in an online questionnaire. Results A total number of 1168 HCWs subscribed to the COVID-19 app which was used 3903 times with an average of 1 minute and 20 seconds per session during a three-month period. The number of active users peaked in April 2020 with 1017 users. Users included medical specialists (22.3%), residents (16.5%), nurses (22.2%), management (6.2%) and other (26.5%). Information for HCWs such as when to test for SARS-CoV-2 (1214), latest updates (1181), the COVID-19 telephone list (418) and the SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 guideline (280) were the most frequently accessed advice. Seventy-one users with a mean age of 46.1 years from 19 different departments completed the questionnaire. Respondents considered the COVID-19 app clear (54/59; 92%), easy-to-use (46/55; 84%), fast (46/52; 88%), useful (52/56; 93%), and had faith in the information (58/70; 83%). The COVID-19 app was used to quickly look up something (43/68; 63%), when no computer was available (15/68; 22%), look up / dial COVID-related phone numbers (15/68; 22%) or when walking from A to B (11/68; 16%). Few respondents felt app use cost time (5/68; 7%). Conclusions Our COVID-19 app proved to be a relatively simple yet innovative tool that was used by HCWs from all disciplines involved in taking care of COVID-19 patients. The up-to-date app was used for different topics and had high user satisfaction amongst questionnaire respondents. An app with local hospital policy could be an invaluable tool during a pandemic.

Efficacy, Safety, Cost, and Clinical Outcomes After the Switch to Generic Rosuvastatin Compared with Consistent Brand-Name Atorvastatin Treatment.

Background: The efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes for patients switch to generic rosuvastatin, compared with patients taking other brand-name atorvastatin, is unclear. Method: We retrospectively collected electronic medical records from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020, of patients who switched medication, because of hospital policy, from brand-name to generic rosuvastatin after March 14, 2018. we only considered patients who had taken the medication at least 1 year prior to and 1 year after that date. We also collected records of patients who consistently used brand-name atorvastatin during the same period. The efficacy of lipid control, potential adverse effects, clinical outcomes of major cardiovascular events (MACE), and medical expenses were compared between the 2 groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to balance potential cofounders. Result: After 1:1 PSM, 592 patients were enrolled in the rosuvastatin and atorvastatin groups, and no significant difference was observed in their total cholesterol (TC) level difference (−4.38 ± 23.0 vs. −3.72 ± 26.95 mg/dL, P = 0.702), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) (−2.38 ± 19.89 vs. −2.42 ± 23.63 mg/dL, P = 0.976), or glycated hemoglobin (−0.05% ± 0.7% vs. −0.08% ± 0.76%, P = 0.543). No significant differences were noted in their cumulative MACE (2.70% vs. 3.89%, log-rank P = 0.265) after the switch date, and each person in the generic group had a 16% average reduction in their medical expenses. Conclusion: Switching to generic rosuvastatin led to comparable lipid-lowering efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes and fewer medical expenses compared with consistently using brand-name atorvastatin.

A management model for admission and treatment of pediatric trauma cases

Background Pediatric trauma, particularly major trauma cases, are often treated in less than optimal facilities by providers who lack training and experience in treating severely injured children. We aimed to develop a management model for admission and treatment of pediatric trauma using the Theory of Constraints (TOC). Methods We conducted interviews with 17 highly experienced policy makers, senior nursing managers and medical managers in pediatrics and trauma. The interviews were analyzed by qualitative methods. The TOC was utilized to identify undesirable effects (UDEs) and core challenges, and to design a focused current reality tree (CRT). Subsequently, a management model for optimal admission and treatment of pediatric trauma was constructed. Results The CRT was illustrated according to 4 identified UDEs focusing on lack of: (1) clear definitions of case manager in pediatric trauma; (2) uniform criteria regarding the appropriate site for admitting pediatric trauma, (3) standard guidelines and protocols for treatment of trauma cases and for training of trauma medical teams; and (4) standard guidelines for evacuating pediatric trauma patients. The management model for treatment and admission of pediatric trauma is based on 3 major elements: human resources, hospital policy concerning the appropriate emergency department (ED) for pediatric trauma patients and clear definitions regarding children and trauma levels. Each of the elements contains components that should be clearly defined in order for a medical center to be designated for admitting and treating pediatric trauma patients. Conclusions Our analysis suggests that the optimal ED for pediatric trauma cases is one with available operating rooms, intensive care beds, an imaging unit, laboratories and equipment suitable for treating children as well as with staff trained to treat children with trauma. To achieve optimal outcomes, medical centers in Israel should be classified according to their trauma treatment capabilities and their ability to treat varied severities of pediatric trauma cases.

Efficacy, Safety, Cost, and Clinical Outcomes After the Switch to Generic Rosuvastatin Compared with Consistent Brand-Name Atorvastatin Treatment.

Background: The efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes for patients switch to generic rosuvastatin, compared with patients taking other brand-name atorvastatin, is unclear. Method: We retrospectively collected electronic medical records from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020, of patients who switched medication, because of hospital policy, from brand-name to generic rosuvastatin after March 14, 2018. we only considered patients who had taken the medication at least 1 year prior to and 1 year after that date. We also collected records of patients who consistently used brand-name atorvastatin during the same period. The efficacy of lipid control, potential adverse effects, clinical outcomes of major cardiovascular events (MACE), and medical expenses were compared between the 2 groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to balance potential cofounders. Result: After 1:1 PSM, 592 patients were enrolled in the rosuvastatin and atorvastatin groups, and no significant difference was observed in their total cholesterol (TC) level difference (−4.38 ± 23.0 vs. −3.72 ± 26.95 mg/dL, P = 0.702), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) (−2.38 ± 19.89 vs. −2.42 ± 23.63 mg/dL, P = 0.976), or glycated hemoglobin (−0.05% ± 0.7% vs. −0.08% ± 0.76%, P = 0.543). No significant differences were noted in their cumulative MACE (2.70% vs. 3.89%, log-rank P = 0.265) after the switch date, and each person in the generic group had a 16% average reduction in their medical expenses. Conclusion: Switching to generic rosuvastatin led to comparable lipid-lowering efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes and fewer medical expenses compared with consistently using brand-name atorvastatin.

Healthcare Dilemma Towards Gift Giving by Patients

Gift giving is generally well-intentioned and graciously accepted to healthcare professionals but it is also one of the concerns that cause an ethical dilemma in health care. Is the gift giving ethically appropriate? Tangible guidance about how healthcare professionals would respond to gift giving is possibly scarce and non-specific. In cases where there is an absence of hospital policy specifying how to treat patients’ gifts, healthcare professionals may need to reflect several factors when addressing the dilemmas. This factor includes a reflection on the implications of responding to the gifts.

Higher versus Lower Oxygen Concentration during Respiratory Support in the Delivery Room in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Pilot Feasibility Study

Background: Optimal starting oxygen concentration for delivery room resuscitation of extremely preterm infants (<29 weeks) remains unknown, with recommendations of 21–30% based on uncertain evidence. Individual patient randomized trials designed to answer this question have been hampered by poor enrolment. Hypothesis: It is feasible to compare 30% vs. 60% starting oxygen for delivery room resuscitation of extremely preterm infants using a change in local hospital policy and deferred consent approach. Study design: Prospective, single-center, feasibility study, with each starting oxygen concentration used for two months for all eligible infants. Population: Infants born at 23 + 0–28 + 6 weeks’ gestation who received delivery room resuscitation. Study interventions: Initial oxygen at 30% or 60%, increasing by 10–20% every minute for heart rate < 100 bpm, or increase to 100% for chest compressions. Primary outcome: Feasibility, defined by (i) achieving difference in cumulative supplied oxygen concentration between groups, and (ii) post-intervention rate consent >50%. Results: Thirty-four infants were born during a 4-month period; consent was obtained in 63%. Thirty (n = 12, 30% group; n = 18, 60% group) were analyzed, including limited data from eight who died or were transferred before parents could be approached. Median cumulative oxygen concentrations were significantly different between the two groups in the first 5 min. Conclusion: Randomized control trial of 30% or 60% oxygen at the initiation of resuscitation of extremely preterm neonates with deferred consent is feasible. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03706586

Creating and Implementing a Protocol for the Management of Patients in Skeletal Traction: A Quality Improvement Project

Introduction.Skeletal traction use generally has decreased over generations and is used most often for temporary fracture stabilization. Proper nursing management of patients in skeletal traction is crucial. A hospital protocol was created and implemented to educate and direct registered nurses (RNs) in the care of patients requiring skeletal traction. Method.A skeletal traction management protocol was drafted and implemented as hospital policy. Twenty-nine RNs from an orthopaedic unit at a level 1 trauma center attended a financially compensated, 45-minute, in-person, off-shift educational session. An anonymous pre-test utilizing a 5-point Likert scale was completed to assess RN knowledge and comfort regarding the following topics of traction care: pin care, manual traction, frame assembly, weight application and removal, skin evaluation, neurovascular checks, and reporting issues. The RNs were provided with a copy of the new hospital policy and key points were highlighted and demonstrated. After the demonstration, the RNs were given a post-test to assess their perceived knowledge and comfort with traction care. Results.Statistically significant improvements in RN knowledge and comfort were seen in six of the seven evaluated topics. The greatest increase was seen in the manual traction topic. No significant change regarding neurovascular checks was observed with this topic having the highest pre-test scores. Conclusion. A hospital protocol was created successfully and implemented that significantly improved the level of RN knowledge and comfort with the management of patients requiring skeletal traction. Future studies should assess the effectiveness of annual education regarding the traction policy.

Burn Care in Kirtipur Hospital before and during COVID 19 Pandemic: Survey of Psychological Issues and Practice Behaviours of Burn Care Personnel

Introduction: The COVID 19 pandemic has adversely impacted all aspects of health care throughout the world. Burn care in lower and middle income countries has suffered the most. We aimed to compare burn care at Kirtipur Hospital before and during the pandemic and explore psychological issues and practice behaviour among burn care worker (BCW). Methods: Retrospective data analysis of burn patients admitted during April to August of 2019 and 2020 was done. Internet based survey of BCW was done. Results: Burn admissions, demographics and characteristics did not change. Fewer surgeries were undertaken in 2020. Almost half of the BCW worked 12 hours shift or longer. Most were working on half pay. Nearly everyone was using hand sanitizers, hand washing and masks. Few had access to level II personal protective equipments (PPE) to see suspected patients; fewer had access to face shield, KN 95 masks and boot. Even gloves and caps were scarce. Many feared getting themselves or family members infected. Majority realized the need of clear hospital policy on how they would be managed when infected. Conclusion: Number, types, severity and mortality did not change. Number of surgeries decreased. Issues like pay cuts, longer working hours and lack of PPEs were reported by majority. J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2021; 39: 241-248