scholarly journals Acoustic rhinometry and video endoscopic scoring to evaluate postoperative outcomes in endonasal spreader graft surgery with septoplasty and turbinoplasty for nasal valve collapse

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bree Erickson ◽  
Robert Hurowitz ◽  
Caroline Jeffery ◽  
Khalid Ansari ◽  
Hamdy El Hakim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acoustic Rhinometry ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Nasal Valve ◽  
Spreader Graft ◽  
Nasal Valve Collapse

scholarly journals Functional and aesthetic outcomes of spreader graft and auto-spreader flap after nasal hump removal

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maged Baher Naguib ◽  
Mohamed Rifaat Ahmed ◽  
Yasser Taha Madian ◽  
Tarek Mohamady Elnahriry ◽  
Wael Elshahat Eldeeb
Keyword(s):  
Nasal Obstruction ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Nasal Valve ◽  
Spreader Graft ◽  
Spreader Flap ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
A New Technique ◽  
Nasal Valve Collapse ◽  
Duration Of Operation

Abstract Background Following the reduction of the nasal hump to a desired level, spreader grafts are usually positioned to prevent the complication of nasal valve collapse. Auto-spreader flap is a new technique that gained more popularity recently and can be used as an alternative to spreader graft. This RCCT compared between both techniques aesthetically and functionally as well as the operative time. Results Forty patients, 17 males (42.5%) and 23 females (57.5%), were included. The mean duration of operation in auto-spreader flap was 11.8 ± 3.4 min, while it was 19.2 ± 3.2 min in spreader graft. The difference between the two procedures was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Functional assessment of nasal obstruction was done for all patients in both groups preoperative that was (75.6 ± 19.9) which showed marked improvement when re-evaluated 3 moths postoperatively (18.9 ± 14.7), and after 6 months NOSE scale was (29.1 ± 20.2). The overall aesthetic satisfaction was 62.5% (25 of 40) irrespective of the surgery done. Sixteen out of 20 patients in spreader group and 9 out of 20 in auto-spreader flap group. Conclusion Auto-spreader flap and spreader graft are very effective surgical procedure for treatment of nasal obstruction due to internal nasal valve dysfunction, but the auto-spreader flap had shorter operative time. However, spreader graft has a superior aesthetic outcome.

scholarly journals Bioabsorbable Implant for Treatment of Nasal Valve Collapse with or without Concomitant Procedures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas M. Sidle ◽  
Pablo Stolovitzky ◽  
Ellen M. O'Malley ◽  
Randall A. Ow ◽  
Nathan E. Nachlas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Nasal Obstruction ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Inferior Turbinate ◽  
Nasal Valve ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
Nasal Implant ◽  
Nasal Valve Collapse

AbstractThe aim of the study is to report outcomes after treatment of nasal valve collapse with a bioabsorbable nasal implant. It involves two prospective, multicenter, post-market studies evaluating long-term effectiveness of the LATERA implant for severe to extreme nasal obstruction. Participants underwent implant alone or with concomitant inferior turbinate reduction (ITR) and/or septoplasty. Outcome measures included the change from baseline Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores, NOSE responder rates, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and adverse events. A total cohort of 277 participants (109 implants only, 67 implants + ITR, 101 implants + septoplasty + ITR) enrolled at 19 U.S. centers was available for analysis with 177 participants (69 implants only, 39 implants + ITR, 69 implants + septoplasty + ITR) available at 2 years. The mean changes from baseline in NOSE scores and VAS scores were statistically significant (p < 0.001) at all follow-up periods. The baseline NOSE score of 77.8 ± 13.6 was improved to 24.2 ± 23.6 at 24 months. Greater than 90% of participants were NOSE responders across all follow-up periods, 6.1% withdrew for lack of treatment effect. The baseline VAS score of 66.7 ± 18.8 was improved to 21.1 ± 23.9 at 24 months. There were no serious adverse events related to the device or implant procedure. Implant retrieval rate was 4.0% (22/543 implants). Nonserious adverse events were mild to moderate in severity, typically occurred within 6 months of implant, and resolved or were stable. Significant reductions in NOSE and VAS scores and high responder rates from our large population of patients with nasal obstruction who had nasal valve implants confirm sustained effectiveness at 24 months after treatment. The studies are registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02952313 and NCT02964312).

Significance of Inner Nasal Valve In Septoplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-8
Author(s):  
Dr. Shraddha Subhash Bhoyar ◽  
Dr. Gajanan Mohniraj Kashid ◽  
Dr. Ashok Gaikwad ◽  
Dr. Siddharth Ashok Purohit ◽  
Dr. Amit Shekhar Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Symptomatic Improvement ◽  
Functional Improvement ◽  
Nasal Valve ◽  
Nasal Surgery ◽  
Spreader Graft ◽  
Persistent Symptoms ◽  
Septal Surgery ◽  
Valve Angle ◽  
Valve Area

Background: Nasal obstruction due to deviated septum is commonly treated with conventional septoplasty. This surgery however is inadequate in cases of compromised nasal valves and leads to persistent symptoms. Hence, we stressed the evaluation of nasal valves before septal surgery & studied the outcome of  the patients with valve area correction. Aim: To prove the significance of inner nasal valve in nasal surgery. Objective : To analyse the outcome of  Open septoplasty. Methodology:A  retrospective review of  our patients undergoing Open septoplasty was analysed from April 2016 to January 2021. The preoperative and post operative evaluations were calculated & statistically analysed. Results : A total of 400 patients underwent Open septoplasty. Out of which 392(98%) showed symptomatic improvement in breathing difficulty &   380(95%) were happy with the asthetic improvement.  Conclusion: Open septoplasty and Spreader grafts is best solution to improve Internal Nasal valve angle. Rim graft to improve external valve collapse. Spreader graft also gives asthetic & functional improvement

Addressing the Nasal Valves: The Endonasal Approach

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatrice C. Go ◽  
Ariel Frost ◽  
Oren Friedman
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Approach ◽  
Endonasal Approach ◽  
Nasal Valve ◽  
Aesthetic Appearance ◽  
Aesthetic Results ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Nasal Valve Collapse

AbstractThe external and internal nasal valves are directly implicated in nasal valve collapse. A variety of endonasal techniques have been developed to address nasal dysfunction while maintaining or improving aesthetic appearance. This review discusses the biomechanics, surgical approach, indications, and evidence of functional and aesthetic results for each maneuver. While the endonasal approach is safe and effective, a thorough understanding of the advantages and limitations is fundamental to selecting the most appropriate surgery for the individual patient.

Evaluation of a new procedure for nasal alar rim and valve collapse: Nasal alar rim reconstruction

2000 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Troell ◽  
Nelson B. Powell ◽  
Robert W. Riley ◽  
Kasey K. Li
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Subjective Evaluation ◽  
Alar Cartilage ◽  
Cartilage Graft ◽  
Nasal Valve ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Nasal Valve Collapse ◽  
Alar Rim ◽  
Valve Area

OBJECTIVE A new operative technique to improve nasal valve collapse by placement of cartilage struts along the alar rim was compared with the standard nasal valve cartilage graft (NVG) technique. METHODS AND PATIENTS A retrospective study of consecutive patients with nasal valve collapse was performed at Stanford University Medical Center. Seventy-nine patients with nasal valve collapse underwent reconstruction with either the classic NVG technique or a newly developed nasal alar rim reconstructive (NARR) procedure. The mean age of the NARR group was 50.13 years (SD ± 9.40), with 36 men (92.3%) and 3 women (7.7%). The mean age of the NVG group was 52.14 years (SD ± 10.83), with 36 men (90%) and 4 women (10%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES These included functional and subjective evaluation of nasal valve collapse. RESULTS Forty patients (50.6%) underwent the NVG technique, and 39 (49.4%) received the NARR procedure. The NVG technique revealed 0% worsened, 15.0% (6/40) unchanged, 25.0% (10/40) improved, and 60% (24/40) free of obstruction. The NARR procedure revealed 2.6% worsened, 2.6% unchanged, 7.7% improved, and 87.1% free of obstruction. CONCLUSIONS Nasal alar cartilage struts placed along the caudal alar rim offers sufficient support to the alar rim and valve area. This procedure appears to be as effective as currently available reconstructive alternatives, while being technically uncomplicated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document