scholarly journals Housing inequality in urban China: the heritage of socialist institutional arrangements

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Changchun Fang ◽  
John Iceland
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 453-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Zhu

After the massive commodification of urban housing in the 1990s, housing inequality is now a major source of wealth inequality in urban China. Previous studies of housing inequality have rarely explored the extent and mechanisms of intergenerational housing inequality reproduction. This study fills this gap and examines how intergenerational housing asset transfer affects housing status in contemporary urban China. An analysis of data from the 2006 Chinese General Social Survey yields two important findings. First, ascribed factors such as parental social status have a greater influence than individuals’ own social status on their housing status. Second, intergenerational housing asset transfer has become an important mechanism of housing inequality reproduction. Elite parents are more likely to provide transferred assets, which prevents their downward-mobilised children from changing their relative housing status. Against the backdrop of rising wealth inequality in China, this study illustrates how the intergenerational transmission of economic resources is becoming an increasingly important mechanism of inequality reproduction.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiping Fang ◽  
Zhilin Liu ◽  
Yulin Chen

Within three decades, the urban housing reform in China has changed access to housing from a system of socialist administrative allocation to that of more market-dominated housing development and consumption. Researchers have studied the socioeconomic and spatial consequences of these profound transformations. This review focuses on China’s housing inequality literature in relation to the changing origins, spatial patterns, and recent policy responses. The article reveals the unique features of China’s transitional economy along with massive urbanization, in which housing inequalities are rooted in socialism and strengthened by institutional changes of a state-led market economy.


1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Logan ◽  
Yanjie Bian ◽  
Fuqin Bian

2015 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shukui Tan ◽  
Siliang Wang ◽  
Conghui Cheng

2020 ◽  
pp. 0734242X2097279
Author(s):  
Benjamin Steuer

The present article centres on institutions, that is, systems of rules that guide behaviour and interaction of socio-economic actors, and their role in advancing China’s circular economy (CE), particularly in waste management (WM). Since the early 2000s, state and non-state actors in China have begun to explore CE ideas in WM resulting in a multitude of related patterns and schemes. In regard to why such systems exhibit different degrees of effectiveness, it appears that much is determined by the institutional arrangements within. Based on several years of field research in China, the article identifies and analyses key institutional ingredients for effective outcomes. Methodologically, these components are identified via an analytical model incorporating WM performance indicators and a framework for assessing interest inclusiveness. Empirically, the analysis is applied to case study findings on the informal and semi-formalised recycling sector in Beijing and Changchun. The resulting findings are synthesised into an evaluation matrix: it indicates which effective informal institutional elements in waste collection and pre-processing allow for a translation into formal systems. The so-demonstrated convertibility indicates a substantial potential for the innovation of current formal WM systems in urban China.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 1088-1109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Can Cui ◽  
Youqin Huang ◽  
Fenglong Wang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document