Vaginal cuff dehiscence following controlled ovarian stimulation recognized during egg retrieval

Abstract Background Vaginal cuff dehiscence is a rare complication of hysterectomy. Those who choose to undergo controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and oocyte cryopreservation following hysterectomy must be aware that elevated abdominal pressure from stimulation as well as transvaginal ultrasound use during monitoring may increase the risk of cuff dehiscence. Case We present a case of a 25-year-old patient who had undergone a hysterectomy four months prior for endometrial cancer who was found to have vaginal cuff dehiscence which was recognized at the time of egg retrieval after COS. Prompt recognition and appropriate management led to successful treatment. Conclusion Patients presenting for oocyte cryopreservation following hysterectomy are at risk for cuff dehiscence. Providers should allow ample time for proper cuff healing prior to COS and oocyte cryopreservation.

Download Full-text

Specific protocols of controlled ovarian stimulation for oocyte cryopreservation in breast cancer patients

Current Oncology ◽

10.3747/co.25.3889 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 25 (6) ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

F. Cavagna ◽

A. Pontes ◽

M. Cavagna ◽

A. Dzik ◽

N. F. Donadio ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Total Dose ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Ovarian Stimulation ◽

Estradiol Level ◽

Controlled Ovarian Stimulation ◽

Oocyte Cryopreservation ◽

Breast Cancer Patients ◽

Specific Protocol ◽

The Mean

Background Fertility preservation is an important concern in breast cancer patients. In the present investigation, we set out to create a specific protocol of controlled ovarian stimulation (cos) for oocyte cryopreservation in breast cancer patients.Methods From November 2014 to December 2016, 109 patients were studied. The patients were assigned to a specific random-start ovarian stimulation protocol for oocyte cryopreservation. The endpoints were the numbers of oocytes retrieved and of mature oocytes cryopreserved, the total number of days of ovarian stimulation, the total dose of gonadotropin administered, and the estradiol level on the day of the trigger.Results Mean age in this cohort was 31.27 ± 4.23 years. The average duration of cos was 10.0 ± 1.39 days. The mean number of oocytes collected was 11.62 ± 7.96 and the mean number of vitrified oocytes was 9.60 ± 6.87. The mean estradiol concentration on triggering day was 706.30 ± 450.48 pg/mL, and the mean dose of gonadotropins administered was 2610.00 ± 716.51 IU. When comparing outcomes by phase of the cycle in which cos was commenced, we observed no significant differences in the numbers of oocytes collected and vitrified, the length of ovarian stimulation, and the estradiol level on trigger day. The total dose of follicle-stimulating hormone and human menopausal gonadotropin administered was statistically greater in the group starting cos in the luteal phase than in the group starting in the late follicular phase.Conclusions Our results suggest that using a specific protocol with random-start ovarian stimulation for oocyte cryopreservation in breast cancer patients is effective and could be offered to young women undergoing oncologic treatment.

Download Full-text