Rock physics model for free : Combining laboratory P and S wave measurements with a model of state behaviour

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Yam ◽  
Douglas R. Schmitt
2020 ◽  
Vol 223 (1) ◽  
pp. 622-631
Author(s):  
Lin Zhang ◽  
Jing Ba ◽  
José M Carcione

SUMMARY Determining rock microstructure remains challenging, since a proper rock-physics model is needed to establish the relation between pore microstructure and elastic and transport properties. We present a model to estimate pore microstructure based on porosity, ultrasonic velocities and permeability, assuming that the microstructure consists on randomly oriented stiff equant pores and penny-shaped cracks. The stiff pore and crack porosity varying with differential pressure is estimated from the measured total porosity on the basis of a dual porosity model. The aspect ratio of pores and cracks and the crack density as a function of differential pressure are obtained from dry-rock P- and S-wave velocities, by using a differential effective medium model. These results are used to invert the pore radius from the matrix permeability by using a circular pore model. Above a crack density of 0.13, the crack radius can be estimated from permeability, and below that threshold, the radius is estimated from P-wave velocities, taking into account the wave dispersion induced by local fluid flow between pores and cracks. The approach is applied to experimental data for dry and saturated Fontainebleau sandstone and Chelmsford Granite.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. SL9-SL23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Humberto S. Arévalo-López ◽  
Jack P. Dvorkin

By using simultaneous impedance inversion, we obtained P- and S-wave impedance ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]) volumes from angle stacks at a siliciclastic turbidite oil reservoir offshore northwest Australia. The ultimate goal was to interpret these elastic variables for fluid, porosity, and mineralogy. This is why an essential part of our workflow was finding the appropriate rock-physics model based on well data. The model-corrected S-wave velocity [Formula: see text] in the wells was used as an input to impedance inversion. The inversion parameters were optimized in small vertical sections around two wells to obtain the best possible match between the seismic impedances and the upscaled impedances measured at the wells. Special attention was paid to the seismically derived [Formula: see text] ratio because we relied on this parameter for hydrocarbon identification. Even after performing crosscorrelation between the angle stacks to correct for two-way traveltime shifts to align the stacks, these stacks did not indicate a coherent amplitude variation with angle (AVA) dependence. To deal with this common problem, we corrected the mid and far stacks by using the near and ultrafar stacks as anchoring points for fitting a [Formula: see text] AVA curve. This choice allowed us to match the seismically derived [Formula: see text] ratio with that predicted by the rock-physics model in the reservoir. Finally, the rock-physics model was used to interpret these [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for the fluid, porosity, and mineralogy. The new paradigm in our inversion/interpretation workflow is that the ultimate quality control of the inversion is in an accurate deterministic match between the seismically derived petrophysical variables and the corresponding upscaled depth curves at the wells. Our interpretation is very sensitive to the inversion results, especially the [Formula: see text] ratio. Despite this fact, we were able to obtain accurate estimates of porosity and clay content in the reservoir and around it.


Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-43
Author(s):  
Dario Grana

Rock physics models are physical equations that map petrophysical properties into geophysical variables, such as elastic properties and density. These equations are generally used in quantitative log and seismic interpretation to estimate the properties of interest from measured well logs and seismic data. Such models are generally calibrated using core samples and well log data and result in accurate predictions of the unknown properties. Because the input data are often affected by measurement errors, the model predictions are often uncertain. Instead of applying rock physics models to deterministic measurements, I propose to apply the models to the probability density function of the measurements. This approach has been previously adopted in literature using Gaussian distributions, but for petrophysical properties of porous rocks, such as volumetric fractions of solid and fluid components, the standard probabilistic formulation based on Gaussian assumptions is not applicable due to the bounded nature of the properties, the multimodality, and the non-symmetric behavior. The proposed approach is based on the Kumaraswamy probability density function for continuous random variables, which allows modeling double bounded non-symmetric distributions and is analytically tractable, unlike the Beta or Dirichtlet distributions. I present a probabilistic rock physics model applied to double bounded continuous random variables distributed according to a Kumaraswamy distribution and derive the analytical solution of the posterior distribution of the rock physics model predictions. The method is illustrated for three rock physics models: Raymer’s equation, Dvorkin’s stiff sand model, and Kuster-Toksoz inclusion model.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-59
Author(s):  
Kai Lin ◽  
Xilei He ◽  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Xiaotao Wen ◽  
Zhenhua He ◽  
...  

Most of current 3D reservoir’s porosity estimation methods are based on analyzing the elastic parameters inverted from seismic data. It is well-known that elastic parameters vary with pore structure parameters such as pore aspect ratio, consolidate coefficient, critical porosity, etc. Thus, we may obtain inaccurate 3D porosity estimation if the chosen rock physics model fails properly address the effects of pore structure parameters on the elastic parameters. However, most of current rock physics models only consider one pore structure parameter such as pore aspect ratio or consolidation coefficient. To consider the effect of multiple pore structure parameters on the elastic parameters, we propose a comprehensive pore structure (CPS) parameter set that is generalized from the current popular rock physics models. The new CPS set is based on the first order approximation of current rock physics models that consider the effect of pore aspect ratio on elastic parameters. The new CPS set can accurately simulate the behavior of current rock physics models that consider the effect of pore structure parameters on elastic parameters. To demonstrate the effectiveness of proposed parameters in porosity estimation, we use a theoretical model to demonstrate that the proposed CPS parameter set properly addresses the effect of pore aspect ratio on elastic parameters such as velocity and porosity. Then, we obtain a 3D porosity estimation for a tight sand reservoir by applying it seismic data. We also predict the porosity of the tight sand reservoir by using neural network algorithm and a rock physics model that is commonly used in porosity estimation. The comparison demonstrates that predicted porosity has higher correlation with the porosity logs at the blind well locations.


2010 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takao Inamori ◽  
Masami Hato ◽  
Kiyofumi Suzuki ◽  
Tatsuo Saeki

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wang Changsheng* ◽  
Shi Yujiang ◽  
Wang Daxing ◽  
Zhang Haitao

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document