Inversion of vehicle-induced signals based on seismic interferometry and recurrent neural networks

Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-44
Author(s):  
Lu Liu ◽  
Yujin Liu ◽  
Tao Li ◽  
Yi He ◽  
Yue Du ◽  
...  

Vehicle-induced vibrations provide useful signals for passive seismic exploration. Such signals are repeatable and environmentally friendly, and hence can provide an economical way to analyze subsurface structures. We propose a new workflow to monitor the roads or railways by producing 1-D subsurface shear-wave velocities in real time. This workflow consists of two steps: seismic interferometry and recurrent neural networks (RNN). Seismic interferometry can efficiently retrieve the surface waves by crosscorrelating the vehicle-induced vibrations. The RNN is designed to first encode the picked dispersion curve into a fixed-length vector and then decode the vector into 1-D shear-wave velocities. To simulate the railway vibrations, we first analyze the time-dependent characteristic of the high-speed-train source and verify its mathematical expression by comparing the frequency spectrum of real data and the synthetic one. We then introduce the RNN-based surface-wave dispersion inversion method and validate the designed network structure using the 3D SEG/EAGE overthrust model. Finally, seismic interferometry and RNN-based surface-wave inversion are applied to a synthetic train-induced data set, a 33-minute field record of railway vibrations and a 76-minute field data of road vibrations, respectively. Both of the synthetic and field data tests show that the proposed workflow can be a feasible and cost-effective tool for real-time monitoring of the subsurface media along roads and railways.

Geophysics ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 56 (12) ◽  
pp. 2129-2138 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Payne

In an effort to understand better the amplitude variation with offset for reflections from an oil sand and the sensitivity of the AVO response to shear‐wave velocity variations, I studied synthetic and field gathers collected from an onshore field in the Gulf of Mexico basin. A wave‐equation‐based modeling program generated the synthetic seismic gathers using both measured and estimated shear‐wave velocities. The measured shear‐wave velocities came from a quadrupole sonic tool. The estimated shear‐wave velocities were obtained by applying published empirical and theoretical equations which relate shear‐wave velocities to measured compressional‐wave velocities. I carefully processed the recorded seismic data with a controlled‐amplitude processing stream. Comparison of the synthetic gathers with the processed field data leads to the conclusion that the model containing the measured shear‐wave velocities matches the field data much better than the model containing the estimated shear‐wave velocities. Therefore, existing equations which relate shear‐wave velocities to compressional‐wave velocities yield estimates which are not sufficiently accurate for making quantitative comparisons of synthetic and field gathers. Even small errors in the shear‐wave velocities can have a large impact on the output. Such errors can lead to an incomplete and perhaps inaccurate understanding of the amplitude‐versus‐offset response. This situation can be remedied by collecting shear‐wave data for use in amplitude‐versus‐offset modeling, and for building databases to generate better shear‐wave velocity estimator equations.


1997 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 1291-1294 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. L. Passier ◽  
R. D. van der Hilst ◽  
R. K. Snieder

2019 ◽  
Vol 219 (3) ◽  
pp. 1532-1549 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Civilini ◽  
W D Mooney ◽  
M K Savage ◽  
J Townend ◽  
H Zahran

SUMMARY Harrat Rahat is a volcanic field located in west-central Saudi Arabia and is the site of the most recent eruption in the country (1256 CE). An earthquake swarm at a nearby volcanic field in 2009 prompted the need for new hazard models for this region, which includes the holy city of Medina. Tomography studies can be used to infer material properties of the subsurface such as partial melt, and are instrumental for volcanic hazard assessment. Regional earthquakes have been used to determine mantle structure, but such crustal models are often hindered by an insufficient number of earthquakes in the plate interior. We use ambient seismic noise to compute Rayleigh and Love surface-wave dispersion maps between 5 and 12 s for northern Harrat Rahat. The surface-wave maps are inverted to produce shear-wave velocities using a neighbourhood algorithm and interpolated into a pseudo-3-D model. The distributions of surface-wave and shear-wave velocities are heterogenous, varying between ±3 and 8 per cent. However, low velocities are not restricted to the Harrat. We observed a difference between Rayleigh- and Love-wave velocities that extends north from the site of the 1256 CE eruption and coincides with a low gravity anomaly. We obtain a shear-wave velocity increase of 10–15 per cent between 15 and 25 km depth consistent with the Conrad discontinuity, the interface between andesitic upper crust and the mafic lower crust of the Arabian Shield. The average velocities of the upper and lower crust are estimated to be 3.64 and 3.95 km s–1 using Rayleigh waves and 3.53 and 4.16 km s–1 using Love waves, which are in good agreement with the results of other geophysical studies of this area. The magnitude of the low-velocity anomalies, their location away from the Harrat, and the lack of reversals in the shear-velocity inversions suggest that the presence of a crustal magma chamber is not likely. If a magma chamber exists, it is smaller than can be imaged with a secondary microseism source (approximately 15 km wavelength), deeper than 30 km, or shallower than 5 km with a small velocity contrast.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Gribler

Surface wave data is commonly used to estimate shear wave velocity of the subsurface. Most standard approaches for analyzing surface wave data fail under conditions when high-impedance boundaries, or sharp contrasts, exists within the range of sensitivities. I present two primary scenarios, one with a high velocity bedrock layer in the upper 20 meters overlain by low velocity unconsolidated sediment, and a thin high velocity road layer on top of unconsolidated sediments. For the shallow bedrock case, I present new multicomponent methods to more accurately and reliably extract surface wave dispersion information from active source waveforms. I also present a new data inversion method that utilizes additional information from multicomponent wavefields, allowing for more accurate estimates of shear wave velocities in these environments. For the thin, high velocity surface layer, I highlight the potential pitfalls of ignoring this layer when inverting for the underlying shear wave velocities, and I propose a solution that yields more accurate velocity estimates. All of these approaches are explained and presented using modeled data, then extended to highlight the improvements over standard approaches using real data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document