Direct expansion of Fourier extrapolator for one-way wave equation using Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind

Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-42
Author(s):  
Hanjie Song ◽  
Jinhai Zhang ◽  
Yongliao Zou

The Fourier method for one-way wave propagation is efficient, but potentially inaccurate in complex media. The implicit finite-difference method can handle arbitrarily complex media, but can be inefficient in 3D and has limited dip bandwidth. We proposed a new Fourier method based on Chebyshev expansion of the second kind. Both theoretical analyses and numerical experiments show that the proposed method is comprehensively superior to a similar method based on Chebyshev expansion of the first kind in terms of balanced amplitude and error tolerance. Within the dip bandwidth from 0 to 65°, the fourth-order form of our method has an error tolerance of 2%, which is about one-third that of Chebyshev expansion of the first kind. Our method is also superior to the implicit finite-difference method in several important aspects: effective bandwidth, computational efficiency, numerical dispersion and two-way splitting error. It can be easily extended from 2D to 3D compared with the finite-difference method and from low orders to high orders compared with the optimized Chebyshev-Fourier method. The proposed method shows better imaging results of the SEG/EAGE model by providing a well-focused salt dome, flank and bottom as well as the detailed structures beneath the salt body, compared with the implicit finite-difference method and Chebyshev expansion of the first kind; meanwhile, our method has less imaging artifacts since it can better position the reflectors.

Author(s):  
Roozbeh Aghamagidi ◽  
Mohammad Emami ◽  
Dariush Firooznia

One of the most important hazards that threatens the stability of power plant buildings is the phenomenon of water hammer, which can occur in the Penstock pipe of a turbine due to the rapid opening and closing of a valve. Fluid Descriptive Equations in this situation, there are two hyperbolic partial nonlinear partial differential equations that are very difficult and complex to solve analytically and are possible only for very simple conditions. In this study, by examining the two numerical methods of characteristic lines and implicit finite difference with Verwy & Yu schema, which are widely used in the analysis of instabilities, their disadvantages and advantages are clearly clarified and a suitable comparison basis for use. They should be provided in different conditions in hydropower plant. The results of the characteristic method in terms of maximum and minimum pressure show more and less values than the implicit finite difference method. In the characteristic method, perturbations and fast wave fronts are presented with more accuracy than the implicit finite difference method. At points near the upstream, downstream and middle boundaries, the accuracy of the characteristic method in presenting pressure and flow fluctuations is higher than the implicit finite difference method. In the characteristic method, it is recommended not to use certain time steps and try as much as possible avoid interpolation by selecting the appropriate time step. The results of examining the amount of changes in coefficient of friction in both methods show that it is not correct to take its value constant (proportional to the value obtained in stable conditions) and coefficient of friction should be calculated in proportion to changes in velocity at different times and used in the governing equation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document