scholarly journals Barriers and facilitators for treatment-seeking for mental health conditions and substance misuse: multi-perspective focus group study within the military – CORRIGENDUM

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Bogaers ◽  
Elbert Geuze ◽  
Jaap van Weeghel ◽  
Fenna Leijten ◽  
Dike van de Mheen ◽  
...  
BJPsych Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Bogaers ◽  
Elbert Geuze ◽  
Jaap van Weeghel ◽  
Fenna Leijten ◽  
Dike van de Mheen ◽  
...  

Background Globally, millions are exposed to stressors at work that increase their vulnerability to develop mental health conditions and substance misuse (such as soldiers, policemen, doctors). However, these types of professionals especially are expected to be strong and healthy, and this contrast may worsen their treatment gap. Although the treatment gap in the military has been studied before, perspectives of different stakeholders involved have largely been ignored, even though they play an important role. Aims To study the barriers and facilitators for treatment-seeking in the military, from three different perspectives. Method In total, 46 people participated, divided into eight homogeneous focus groups, including three perspectives: soldiers with mental health conditions and substance misuse (n = 20), soldiers without mental health conditions and substance misuse (n = 10) and mental health professionals (n = 16). Sessions were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim. Content analysis was done by applying a general inductive approach using ATLAS.ti-8.4.4 software. Results Five barriers for treatment-seeking were identified: fear of negative career consequences, fear of social rejection, confidentiality concerns, the ‘strong worker’ workplace culture and practical barriers. Three facilitators were identified: social support, accessibility and knowledge, and healthcare within the military. The views of the different stakeholder groups were highly congruent. Conclusions Barriers for treatment-seeking were mostly stigma related (fear of career consequences, fear of social rejection and the ‘strong worker’ workplace culture) and this was widely recognised by all groups. Social support from family, peers, supervisors and professionals were identified as important facilitators. A decrease in the treatment gap for mental health conditions and substance misuse is needed and these findings provide direction for future research and destigmatising interventions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Delman

This research brief discusses the disparities in vocational rehabilitation (VR) services and supports that Black young adults with mental health conditions face when compared to their White peers. It touches on what the disparities this population faces in VR are, research on barriers and facilitators to employment for Black young adults, engagement and access to vocational services and areas for future study.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. E. Larson ◽  
P. S. Hammer ◽  
T. L. Conway ◽  
E. A. Schmied ◽  
M. R. Galarneau ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (7) ◽  
pp. 670-677
Author(s):  
Keith R. Aronson ◽  
Daniel F. Perkins ◽  
Nicole R. Morgan ◽  
Julia A. Bleser ◽  
Dawne Vogt ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 125
Author(s):  
Emer Galvin ◽  
Shane Desselle ◽  
Blánaid Gavin ◽  
Etain Quigley ◽  
Mark Flear ◽  
...  

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic response has led to an exponential increase in the use and spread of telemedicine internationally. In community mental health care settings, telemedicine services were implemented within a few weeks, with little time for rigorous planning. Despite the reported acceptability of telemedicine by patients and clinicians, barriers to its implementation have come to light. There is now a need to investigate these barriers, and facilitators, as telemedicine begins to show potential promise beyond the pandemic. We propose a review that aims to identify the factors affecting the implementation of telemedicine consultations for patients with mental health conditions in the community. Methods: A systematic review will be conducted and reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. Five electronic databases will be searched using a pre-defined search strategy from 2016 to 2021. Only studies of synchronous, interactive telemedicine consultations conducted via video, phone or live messaging between patients and providers will be included. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies will be eligible for inclusion. Only studies published in the English language will be included. Titles and abstracts will be screened by two reviewers. Full text articles will be screened by a single reviewer, with a random 20% sample screened by a second reviewer. The methodological quality of studies will be assessed using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool (MMAT) by two reviewers. Data will be extracted and tabulated to address the aims of the review. A narrative synthesis will be conducted and reported factors will be mapped to the domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Conclusion: By identifying the factors that influence the implementation of telemedicine consultations for patients with mental conditions in the community, consideration can be given to both barriers and facilitators that could be addressed in future mental health services planning. PROSPERO registration: CRD42021273422 (04/10/2021)


Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 70-LB
Author(s):  
ALEJANDRA M. WIEDEMAN ◽  
YING FAI NGAI ◽  
AMANDA M. HENDERSON ◽  
CONSTADINA PANAGIOTOPOULOS ◽  
ANGELA M. DEVLIN

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document