scholarly journals Junior doctors' workloads in psychiatric hospitals

1989 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 507-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. S. Brown ◽  
M. R. Ward
Author(s):  
Lauren Alexander ◽  
Eimear Counihan ◽  
Deirdre McNally ◽  
Leonard Douglas

Objectives: Staff working in mental health services provide care for individuals with a variety of difficulties, which can pose treatment challenges. Perceived lack of progress in patients can engender uncomfortable feelings within the clinician, such as frustration, ‘heartsink’ and ‘feeling stuck’. The aim of this study was to explore the phenomenon of ‘feeling stuck’ amongst NCHDs in psychiatry. Methods: A total of 30 participants were recruited from three psychiatric hospitals to complete a 15-item questionnaire. The survey was designed to pursue a thematic analysis. Participants were asked to complete the survey anonymously, either online or paper version. The analysis was carried out by two researchers using open coding, with themes finalised through collective discourse. Results: Three themes were elicited from the data. The central theme – ‘causes of feeling stuck’ – consisted of three subthemes (patient, doctor and system factors). Participants were adept at describing patient and system factors, but reflected on doctor factors, such as countertransference, less often and in less detail. Other themes, explored in less detail by respondents, were ‘the experience of feeling stuck’ and ‘responses to feeling stuck’, with participants tending to seek solutions to, rather than an understanding of, these feelings. Conclusions: Trainee psychiatrists can clearly identify the situations where they are ‘stuck’ with clinical interactions. In spite of clinical supervision and reflective practice groups, they desire further training in managing these scenarios. NCHDs would benefit from further training, using these ‘stuck’ interactions as material, to further develop their understanding of the underlying factors in both themselves and their patients.


BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S209-S209
Author(s):  
Mohit Mohan ◽  
Ruth Scally ◽  
James Reed ◽  
Calin Cavaropol

AimsAccurate and timely handover of clinical information is of great importance to continuity and safety of care. Psychiatry doctors typically cover a number of sites across a catchment when they are on-call. Consequently, handover between on-call teams and day teams in psychiatric hospitals is reliant on using the nursing staff as an intermediary to flag concerns or relying on the day teams proactively checking the notes on daily basis for outstanding tasks.The key objective of this project was to use Microsoft teams to establish a handover system that is efficient, safe, reliable, easy to use and replicable.MethodA microsoft teams group was created comprising of all the medical staff members working at inpatient units across three sites that are part of Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Trust. These members were divided into two groups - the ‘on-call team’ and the ‘day team’. Within the ‘day team’, every consultant was grouped with their junior doctors to form multiple subgroups.A system was established wherein the two teams could communicate with each other by posting a message and tagging the appropriate team. A provision was made to create a channel for every ward to allow for easy segregation and monitoring of tasks.Qualitative information about the use of the tool was monitored by monthly focus group meetings. A formal review of the messages was conducted after 8 weeks to assess the following parameters:Number of messages postedNumber of messages acknowledgedNumber of safety-related incidentsResultInitial evaluation of the results suggests that the new handover system was perceived to be safe, accurate and efficient while being intuitive and hassle-free. This increased the quantity and enhanced the quality of communication between the ‘on-call’ and the ‘day teams’ and allowed for early completion of tasks while reducing the number of safety-related incidents.ConclusionThe Microsoft teams proved to be a viable alternate tool to create a virtual handover process that is efficient, safe, reliable and user-friendly. It also has the potential to enhance the communication between inpatient and community teams.


Author(s):  
Ellen R. Gritz ◽  
June M. Stapleton ◽  
Mary A. Hill ◽  
Murray E. Jarvik

Author(s):  
Richard W. Redick ◽  
Atlee Stroup ◽  
Michael J. Witkin ◽  
Joanne E. Atay

1962 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel H. Siegel ◽  
Robert L. Kahn ◽  
Max Pollack ◽  
Max Fink

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document