Learning Health System for Breast Cancer: Pilot Project Experience

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark N. Levine ◽  
Gordon Alexander ◽  
Arani Sathiyapalan ◽  
Anjali Agrawal ◽  
Greg Pond

PURPOSE Clinicians need accurate and timely information on the impact of treatments on patient outcomes. The electronic health record (EHR) offers the potential for insight into real-world patient experiences and outcomes, but it is difficult to tap into. Our goal was to apply artificial intelligence technology to the EHR to characterize the clinical course of patients with stage III breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from patients with stage III breast cancer who presented between 2013 and 2015 were extracted from the EHR, de-identified, and imported into the IBM Cloud. Specialized natural language processing (NLP) annotators were developed to extract medical concepts from unstructured clinical text and transform them to structured attributes. In the validation phase, these annotators were applied to 19 additional patients with stage III breast cancer from the same period. The resulting data were compared with that in the medical chart (gold standard) for nine key indicators. RESULTS Information was extracted for 50 patients, including tumor stage (94% stage IIIA, 6% stage IIIB), age (28% 50 years or younger, 52% between 51 and 70 years, and 24% older than 70 years), receptor status (84% estrogen receptor positive, 74% progesterone receptor positive), and first treatment (72% surgery, 26% chemotherapy, 2% endocrine). Events in the patient’s journey were compiled to create a timeline. For 171 data elements, NLP and the chart disagreed for 41 (24%; 95% CI, 17.8% to 31.1%). With additional manipulation using simple logic, the disagreement was reduced to six elements (3.5%; 95% CI, 1.3% to 7.5%; F1 statistic, 0.9694). CONCLUSION It is possible to extract, read, and combine data from the EHR to view the patient journey. The agreement between NLP and the gold standard was high, which supports validity.

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Olayide Agodirin ◽  
Samuel Olatoke ◽  
Ganiyu Rahman ◽  
Julius Olaogun ◽  
Oladapo Kolawole ◽  
...  

Background. Reports are scanty on the impact of long primary care interval in breast cancer. Exploratory reports in Nigeria and other low-middle-income countries suggest detrimental impact. The primary aim was to describe the impact of long primary care interval on breast cancer progression, and the secondary aim was to describe the factors perceived by patients as the reason(s) for long intervals. Method. Questionnaire-based survey was used in 9 Nigerian tertiary institutions between May 2017 and July 2018. The study hypothesis was that the majority of patients stayed >30 days, and the majority experienced stage migration in primary care interval. Assessment of the impact of the length of interval on tumor stage was done by survival analysis technique, and clustering analysis was used to find subgroups of the patient journey. Results. A total of 237 patients presented to primary care personnel with tumor ≤5cm (mean 3.4±1.2cm). A total of 151 (69.3%, 95% CI 62.0-75.0) stayed >30 days in primary care interval. Risk of stage migration in primary care interval was 49.3% (95% CI 42.5%-56.3%). The most common reasons for long intervals were symptom misinformation and misdiagnosis. Clustering analysis showed 4 clusters of patients’ experience and journey: long interval due to distance, long interval due to misinformation, long interval due to deliberate delaying, and not short interval—prepared for treatment. Conclusion. The majority of patients stayed longer than 30 days in primary care interval. Long primary care interval was associated with a higher risk of stage migration, and more patients reported misinformation and misdiagnosis as reasons for a long interval.


1982 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 1315-1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Stewart ◽  
Roger J.B. King ◽  
Peter J. Winter ◽  
David Tong ◽  
John L. Hayward ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 106 (12) ◽  
pp. 2569-2575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uwe Güth ◽  
Gad Singer ◽  
Igor Langer ◽  
Andreas Schötzau ◽  
Linda Herberich ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 3625-3634
Author(s):  
KOSHO YAMANOUCHI ◽  
SHIGETO MAEDA ◽  
DAIKI TAKEI ◽  
YOICHI KOGA ◽  
MANPEI YAMASHITA ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.P. Derman ◽  
S. Browde ◽  
I.L. Kessel ◽  
N.G.De Moor ◽  
M. Lange ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document