Chemohormonal therapy in advanced carcinoma of the breast: Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocol 8081.

1987 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 1534-1545 ◽  
Author(s):  
M C Perry ◽  
C G Kardinal ◽  
A H Korzun ◽  
S J Ginsberg ◽  
P C Raich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Menopausal Status ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Differential Response ◽  
Time To Treatment ◽  
Time To Treatment Failure ◽  
Group B ◽  
Leukemia Group ◽  
Er Status

In a prospective, randomized trial Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) evaluated CAF chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin + 5-fluorouracil [5-FU]) v CAF plus tamoxifen (TCAF) in advanced breast cancer. Patients were stratified by estrogen receptor (ER) status, dominant site of metastatic disease, menopausal status, and prior adjuvant therapy. Regardless of ER status or menopausal status, the addition of tamoxifen conferred no significant advantage in response rate, response duration, time to treatment failure (TTF) or survival over CAF alone. A secondary objective was to compare the response to CAF of ER positive (ER+) and ER negative (ER-) patients to determine if there was a differential response to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Response rates of ER+ and ER- patients to CAF were identical (56%), but the response duration, time to treatment failure, and survival of ER+ patients were significantly longer than ER- patients. This lack of differential response implies that chemotherapy and hormonal therapy may compete for the same pool of ER+ cells. It also suggests that chemotherapy kills breast cancer cells indiscriminately, regardless of ER status.

Phase III Study of Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Fluorouracil (CAF) Plus Leucovorin Versus CAF for Metastatic Breast Cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9140

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1819-1824 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.L. Parnes ◽  
C. Cirrincione ◽  
J. Aisner ◽  
D.A. Berry ◽  
S.L. Allen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Time To Treatment ◽  
Time To Treatment Failure ◽  
Group B ◽  
Leukemia Group

Purpose: To determine whether biochemical modulation with LV (leucovorin) enhances the efficacy of CAF (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil) against metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Women with histologically confirmed stage IV breast cancer, Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) performance status 0 to 2, and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were randomly assigned to receive CAF (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 day 1, doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 day 1, and fluorouracil [FU] 200 mg/m2 intravenous bolus days 1 to 5) with or without LV (LV 200 mg/m2 over 30 minutes days 1 to 5 given 1 hour before FU). Results: Two hundred forty-two patients were randomly assigned to treatment; 124 patients had visceral crisis and 40 patients had a CALGB performance status score of 2. The median follow-up was 6 years. The two study arms were similar with regard to serious adverse events; four patients died from treatment-related causes, two patients on each study arm. Predictive variables for time to treatment failure and survival were visceral disease and performance status. The overall response rate was 29% for CAF versus 28% for CAF plus LV. The median time to treatment failure (9 months) and median survival (1.7 years) did not differ by treatment arm. Conclusion: Modulation of CAF with LV improved neither response rates nor survival among women with metastatic breast cancer, compared with CAF alone. Multivariate analyses confirmed the prognostic importance of performance status and visceral crisis. However, the overall and complete response rates, response durations, time to treatment failure, and survival were the same in the two treatment arms.

Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor levels in estrogen receptor-positive patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with tamoxifen: results of a prospective Southwest Oncology Group study.

1992 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1284-1291 ◽  
Author(s):  
P M Ravdin ◽  
S Green ◽  
T M Dorr ◽  
W L McGuire ◽  
C Fabian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Menopausal Status ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Time To Treatment ◽  
Time To Treatment Failure ◽  
Er Positive ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

PURPOSE Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) protocol 8228 is a prospective trial designed to investigate the prognostic significance of progesterone receptor (PgR) levels in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer patients who were treated with tamoxifen. This study was undertaken because the value of PgR measurements in advanced breast cancer had been assessed previously only in studies that were small, retrospective, or included heterogeneously treated patients. METHODS Receptor assays were performed only in the laboratories that met strict quality control guidelines. Of the 398 patients entered, 342 patients were eligible and assessable for the study end points of objective clinical response, time to treatment failure, and overall survival. RESULTS Multivariate analysis shows that elevated PgR levels significantly and independently correlated with increased probability of response to tamoxifen, longer time to treatment failure, and longer overall survival. Overall response rate (defined as complete response [CR], partial response [PR], or stable disease [SD] for greater than 6 months) in this trial was 54%. Response rates to tamoxifen were 43%, 53%, and 61% in subsets of patients with less than 10, 10 to 99, and more than 100 fmol/mg PgR, respectively. Exploratory subset analysis using PgR and other prognostic variables identified ER-positive patient subsets with response rates to tamoxifen ranging from 24% (premenopausal patients) to 86% (postmenopausal patients with ER greater than 38 and PgR greater than 329 fmol/mg). No groups of ER-positive patients were identified who had such a low response rate as to absolutely preclude considering the use of tamoxifen. Multivariate analysis showed the independent, statistically significant predictors were: for response to tamoxifen, menopausal status, PgR, and ER; for time to treatment failure, menopausal status, disease-free interval (DFI), PgR, and ER; and for overall survival DFI, PgR, ER, site of disease, and history of adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION We conclude that knowledge of PgR levels together with other clinical information can improve the pretreatment assessment of ER-positive breast cancer patients with metastatic disease.

Time to treatment failure of palbociclib and letrozole as second-line therapy or beyond in hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1374-1380 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Alexandra Schickli ◽  
Michael J Berger ◽  
Maryam Lustberg ◽  
Marilly Palettas ◽  
Craig A Vargo
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Time To Treatment ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinases ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Time To Treatment Failure

Purpose The management of endocrine therapy resistance is one of the most challenging facets of advanced breast cancer treatment. Palbociclib is an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 approved for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer in combination with fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with disease progression following endocrine therapy. However, treatment responsiveness of tumors to palbociclib after multiple lines of endocrine therapy is not clearly established. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of palbociclib and letrozole in patients pretreated with one or more lines of endocrine therapy. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of all postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients who received palbociclib and letrozole as a second-line endocrine therapy or beyond (and no prior cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitor therapy) between February 1, 2015, and July 31, 2016. The primary objective was to evaluate time to treatment failure of palbociclib in combination with letrozole as a second-line of therapy or beyond. Results Fifty-three patients meeting eligibility criteria were included in the analysis. For the primary outcome, the median time to treatment failure of palbociclib and letrozole was 6.3 months (95% CI 3.1–7.4 months). Progression-free survival of palbociclib and letrozole therapy was 6.4 months (95% CI 4.9–8.3 months). Conclusions Palbociclib and letrozole therapy is a viable, effective treatment option for metastatic breast cancer patients who were not exposed to cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors as a first-line endocrine therapy. The benefits of palbociclib and letrozole therapy were seen without excessive toxicity, and although neutropenia was common, it may be managed with dose reduction.

The Addition of Rituximab to First-Line Chemotherapy (R-CHOP) Results in Superior Response Rates, Time to Treatment Failure and Response Duration in Patients with Advanced Stage Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Long Term Results of a Randomized GLSG Trial

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3049-3049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Hoster ◽  
Michael Unterhalt ◽  
Bernhard Wörmann ◽  
Ulrich Dührsen ◽  
Bernd Metzner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Time To Treatment ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Time To Treatment Failure

Abstract Background: The addition of rituximab to chemotherapy (R-CHOP) has been shown to improve response rates in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), but prolongation of response duration or overall survival was not observed (Lenz et al., JCO 2005). In a similar randomized comparison of 90 patients, again the addition of rituximab to MCP showed a tendency towards higher CR rates, but no improvement of overall response rate, progression free, or overall survival (Herold et al., ICML-10, 2008). Methods: We present an update of a previously published trial randomly comparing efficacy and safety of R-CHOP to CHOP induction in previously untreated patients with advanced stage MCL. Results: Of the 123 evaluable patients, 63 patients were randomized to R-CHOP. Median age was 62 years, and risk profiles of the two treatment arms were comparable. Overall response rates were 92% vs. 75% for R-CHOP vs. CHOP (p = 0.0139) and complete remission rates 33% vs. 8% (p = 0.0008). After a median follow-up of 65 months, median time to treatment failure was prolonged from 14 months for CHOP to 28 months for R-CHOP (p = 0.0003). Similarly, median response duration was prolonged from 18 (CHOP) to 29 months (R-CHOP, p = 0.0052). So far, no significant improvement of overall survival has been observed with median not reached vs. 59 months and 5-years OS rates of 59% and 46% (p = 0.27) after R-CHOP and CHOP, respectively. Toxicity was not significantly higher for R-CHOP treated patients. Conclusions: After longer follow-up, superior remission rates, time to treatment failure, and response duration of combined immuno-chemotherapy were confirmed. However, in contrast to other lymphoma entities, improvement of overall survival has not yet been proven in MCL patients. Therefore new therapeutic options are urgently warranted to further improve the long term outcome in this otherwise dismal disease.

scholarly journals Six Cycles of Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide or Paclitaxel Are Not Superior to Four Cycles As Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer in Women With Zero to Three Positive Axillary Nodes: Cancer and Leukemia Group B 40101

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (33) ◽  
pp. 4071-4076 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence N. Shulman ◽  
Constance T. Cirrincione ◽  
Donald A. Berry ◽  
Heather P. Becker ◽  
Edith A. Perez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Primary Breast Cancer ◽  
Chemotherapy Regimen ◽  
Menopausal Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Group B ◽  
Leukemia Group

Purpose The ideal duration of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with lower risk primary breast cancer is not known. Cancer and Leukemia Group B trial 40101 was conducted using a phase III factorial design to define whether six cycles of a chemotherapy regimen are superior to four cycles. We also sought to determine whether paclitaxel (T) is as efficacious as doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC), but with reduced toxicity. Patients and Methods Between 2002 and 2008, the study enrolled women with operable breast cancer and zero to three positive nodes. Patients were randomly assigned to either four or six cycles of either AC or T. Study stratifiers were estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor (ER/PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and menopausal status. After 2003, all treatment was administered in dose-dense fashion. The primary efficacy end point was relapse-free survival (RFS). Results A total of 3,171 patients were enrolled; 94% were node-negative and 6% had one to three positive nodes. At a median follow-up of 5.3 years, the 4-year RFS was 90.9% and 91.8% for six and four cycles, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of six to four cycles regarding RFS was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.84 to 1.28; P = .77). The 4-year OS was 95.3% and 96.3% for six and four cycles, respectively, with an HR of six to four cycles of 1.12 (95% CI, 0.84 to 1.49; P = .44). There was no interaction between treatment duration and chemotherapy regimen, ER/PgR, or HER2 status on RFS or OS. Conclusion For women with resected primary breast cancer and zero to three positive nodes, we found no evidence that extending chemotherapy regimens of AC or single-agent T from four to six cycles improves clinical outcome.

scholarly journals Metronomic chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer to prolong time to treatment failure to 12 months or more

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
KEIICHI KONTANI ◽  
SHIN-ICHIRO HASHIMOTO ◽  
CHISA MURAZAWA ◽  
SHOKO NORIMURA ◽  
HIROAKI TANAKA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Metronomic Chemotherapy ◽  
Time To Treatment ◽  
Time To Treatment Failure

scholarly journals Long Term Follow up of the Resort Study (E4402): A Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Two Different Rituximab Dosing Strategies for Low Tumor Burden Follicular Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 815-815
Author(s):  
Brad S. Kahl ◽  
Fangxin Hong ◽  
Christopher Peterson ◽  
Lode J. Swinnen ◽  
Thomas M. Habermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Cytotoxic Therapy ◽  
Time To Treatment ◽  
Time To Treatment Failure ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Abstract BACKGROUND: E4402 was a randomized phase III study comparing two different rituximab dosing strategies for patients with previously untreated, low tumor burden follicular lymphoma (FL). The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure. The initial publication (Kahl, JCO 2014) demonstrated that a retreatment strategy utilized less drug and produced comparable time to treatment failure compared to a maintenance strategy. Here we provide long term follow up results, focusing on response duration, time to first cytotoxic therapy, overall survival, and risk of histologic transformation. METHODS: Eligible patients had untreated, low tumor burden (GELF criteria) FL. Patients received R 375 mg/m 2 weekly x 4 and responders were randomized to maintenance rituximab (MR) (single dose R q 3 months) or retreatment rituximab (RR) (R weekly x 4 doses at disease progression). Each strategy was continued until treatment failure. The primary endpoint, time to treatment failure, was defined as progression within 6 months of last R, no response to R retreatment, initiation of alternative therapy, or inability to complete protocol therapy. Secondary endpoints included time to first cytotoxic therapy, quality of life and safety. The ECOG Data Monitoring Committee recommended release of study results at a planned interim analysis in September 2011 and patients and providers were notified of results. Time to treatment failure data collection halted with release of the results but limited data collection on time to first cytotoxic therapy, response duration, and risk of histologic transformation continued. INITITIAL RESULTS: From 11/03 to 9/08, 384 patients with FL were enrolled. Complete or partial response was achieved in 289 patients (71%), who were then randomized to MR (n=146) or RR (n=143). Demographic features were similar in the two arms: median age 59 years; ECOG PS 0-1 in all patients, and FLIPI low-risk (14.9 vs. 16.4%), intermediate-risk (46.3 vs. 42.9%) and high-risk (38.8 vs. 40.7%) for MR vs. RR, respectively. At initial publication, with a median follow-up of 3.8 years, the time to treatment failure was 3.9 years for MR vs. 3.6 years for RR (p=NS). LONG TERM FOLLOW UP RESULTS: Immunoglobulin levels and risks for serious infections/late complications in MR patients will be updated at the annual meeting. For the endpoint of time to first cytotoxic therapy, the median follow up is 8.7 years. At 7 years, 83% of MR and 63% of RR remained free from first cytotoxic therapy (HR 2.37; 95% CI 1.50 - 3.76) [Figure 1]. For the endpoint of response duration, the median follow up is 12.1 years. At 10 years, 66% of the MR patients remained in their 1 st remission compared to 30% of the RR patients who remained in their 1 st remission [Figure 2]. The median response duration for RR patients receiving a single 4-week course of rituximab was 3.25 years. There was no difference in the overall survival at 10 years, 84% for MR vs. 83% for RR. There was a trend towards a lower risk of histologic transformation for patients receiving MR (n = 4) compared to RR (n = 11) (p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: With long term follow up, the RESORT data indicates that in previously untreated, low tumor burden, follicular lymphoma, MR was superior to RR for delaying time to first cytotoxic therapy and for response duration, with a trend towards reducing the risk of histologic transformation. MR did not improve the overall survival. The original publication concluded that the time to treatment failure is similar between the two dosing strategies. Due to study design, time to treatment failure could not be analyzed in this long term follow up analysis. Compared to the historical benchmark of 3 years median time to first cytotoxic therapy when watch and wait is utilized, single agent rituximab, administered by either dosing strategy, was highly effective at delaying the time to first cytotoxic therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kahl: AbbVie, Adaptive, ADCT, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Incyte, Janssen, Karyopharm, Kite, MEI, Pharmacyclics, Roche, TG Therapeutics, and Teva: Consultancy; AbbVie, Acerta, ADCT, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Genentech: Research Funding. Habermann: Incyte: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Tess Therapeutics: Other: Data Monitoring Committee; Seagen: Other: Data Monitoring Committee; Morphosys: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Loxo Oncology: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Eli Lilly & Co.,: Other: Scientific Advisor. Schuster: Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; DTRM: Research Funding; Genetech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Juno Theraputics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Pharmaclcyclics: Research Funding; Tessa Theraputics: Consultancy; TG Theraputics: Research Funding. Fenske: TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Servier Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; MorphoSys: Consultancy; Kite (Gilead): Speakers Bureau; KaryoPharm: Consultancy; CSL Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Biogen: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document