Improving Survival Without Reducing Quality of Life in Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients by Increasing the Dose-Intensity of Chemotherapy With Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Support: Results of a British Medical Research Council Multicenter Randomized Trial

PURPOSE: The treatment of small-cell lung cancer patients with good performance status aims to improve survival. Dose-intensification could be a way to achieve improved survival but can be limited by neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Preliminary, nonrandomized feasibility studies showed that doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (ACE) could be given every 2 (instead of the usual 3) weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (lenograstim; Chugai-Rhône-Poulenc, Tokyo, Japan) support. The present multicenter randomized trial was designed to examine whether such dose-intensification improves survival while maintaining acceptable toxicity levels. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients were randomized to receive six cycles of ACE either every 3 weeks (control [C] group) or every 2 weeks with G-CSF (G group). The standard dose-intensity of ACE was increased by 50% in group G. RESULTS: Four hundred and three patients (G group: n = 201; C group: n = 202) were randomized. The received dose-intensity was 34% higher in the G group than in the C group. Complete response rates were 40% for the G group and 28% for the C group (P = .02), and overall rates were 78% for the G group and 79% for the C group. Survival was longer in the G group (hazard ratio = 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.65 to 0.99; P = .04), survival rates for the G and C groups being 47% and 39% at 12 months and 13% and 8% at 24 months, respectively. Metastasis-free survival, nonhematologic toxicity, and quality of life were similar in the two groups. In the G group, there was less neutropenia but more thrombocytopenia and more frequent blood and platelet transfusions. CONCLUSION: Increasing the dose-intensity of ACE with G-CSF support improved survival while maintaining acceptable toxicity.

Download Full-text

Received dose-intensity: a randomized trial of weekly chemotherapy with and without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in small-cell lung cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.1994.12.1.77 ◽

1994 ◽

Vol 12 (1) ◽

pp. 77-82 ◽

Cited By ~ 33

Author(s):

D W Miles ◽

O Fogarty ◽

C M Ash ◽

R M Rudd ◽

C W Trask ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Randomized Trial ◽

Dose Intensity ◽

Small Cell ◽

Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽

Colony Stimulating Factor ◽

Small Cell Lung ◽

Weekly Chemotherapy ◽

Treatment Delays ◽

Stimulating Factor ◽

Dose Reductions

PURPOSE A prospective randomized trial to determine if granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) could increase the received dose-intensity (RDI) of weekly chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty patients with SCLC with good prognostic features (all patients with limited disease [LD], and extensive-disease [ED] patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] 0 or 1 and plasma alkaline phosphatase levels < 1.5 times the upper limit of normal) were randomized to receive weekly chemotherapy with or without G-CSF. G-CSF (5 micrograms/kg) was self-administered subcutaneously on days when chemotherapy was not given. Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin 50 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1 and etoposide 75 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 2 alternating weekly with ifosfamide 2 g/m2 IV (with mesna) and doxorubicin 25 mg/m2 on day 1, for a total of 12 courses. Dose modifications (dose reductions and treatment delays) were made according to defined hematologic criteria. RESULTS Dose reductions were made at some point during treatment in 12 of 17 patients in the control arm and in 11 of 23 patients in the G-CSF arm (P = .20). The proportion of patients experiencing dose reductions due to leukopenia was significantly higher in the control arm (nine of 17) compared with the G-CSF arm (four of 23, P < .04). Cycle delays due to leukopenia were similar in both arms of the study. The RDI was 82% of projected in the control arm (95% confidence interval [CI], 79% to 84%) and 84% in patients receiving G-CSF (95% CI, 82% to 87%) (P value not significant). CONCLUSION In this randomized trial, G-CSF significantly decreased dose reductions due to neutropenia. However, administration of G-CSF did not decrease dose reductions or treatment delays to a level that would allow an increase in received dose-intensity. Nonhematologic toxicities such as increased creatinine concentration also prevented an increase in the RDI in the G-CSF arm.

Download Full-text