Surgical treatment satisfaction among women with breast cancer: The role of preferences regarding shared decision making

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6033-6033
Author(s):  
P. M. Lantz ◽  
N. K. Janz ◽  
A. Fagerlin ◽  
M. Mujahid ◽  
B. Salem ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6033-6033 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Lantz ◽  
N. K. Janz ◽  
A. Fagerlin ◽  
M. Mujahid ◽  
B. Salem ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 218-218
Author(s):  
Soumya J. Niranjan ◽  
Audrey S. Wallace ◽  
Beverly R Williams ◽  
Yasemin E. Turkman ◽  
Courtney Williams ◽  
...  

218 Background: Increasing emphasis on patient-centered care has led to shared decision making, which better aligns medical decisions with patient preferences for care. In its 2004 report, Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion, the US Institute of Medicine defines health literacy as the degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process and understand basic health information and services needed to make appropriate health decisions. However, little is known about the confluent role of patient health information seeking patterns and physician trust in the decision-making process. Therefore, we assessed perspectives of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients and health care professionals regarding how health information seeking and physician trust influence decision making. Methods: Qualitative interviews with 26 MBC patients and 6 community oncologists, as well as 3 separate focus groups involving lay navigators, nurses, and academic oncologists, were recorded and transcribed. Qualitative data analysis was conducted using a content analysis approach that included a constant comparative method to generate themes from the transcribed textual data. Results: Five prominent themes emerged from these responses. (1) Patients’ primary source of treatment information were physicians. (2) Patients differed in their approach to seeking further health information regarding the discussed treatment options (e.g. internet websites, family and friends, support groups). (3) Patients trusted their physician’s recommendations to achieve their goals of care. (4) Oncologists were cognizant of their fundamental role in facilitating informed decision making (5) Patient and physician discordant perspectives on shared decision making were apparent. Conclusions: Patient procurement of health information and their capacity to use it effectively to make informed decisions in conjunction with their trust in physicians, may play an important role in shared decision making.


2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 556-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. J. Katz ◽  
P. M. Lantz ◽  
N. K. Janz ◽  
A. Fagerlin ◽  
B. Salem ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 556-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. J. Katz ◽  
P. M. Lantz ◽  
N. K. Janz ◽  
A. Fagerlin ◽  
B. Salem ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Pryce ◽  
Amanda Hall

Shared decision-making (SDM), a component of patient-centered care, is the process in which the clinician and patient both participate in decision-making about treatment; information is shared between the parties and both agree with the decision. Shared decision-making is appropriate for health care conditions in which there is more than one evidence-based treatment or management option that have different benefits and risks. The patient's involvement ensures that the decisions regarding treatment are sensitive to the patient's values and preferences. Audiologic rehabilitation requires substantial behavior changes on the part of patients and includes benefits to their communication as well as compromises and potential risks. This article identifies the importance of shared decision-making in audiologic rehabilitation and the changes required to implement it effectively.


Author(s):  
Marta Maes-Carballo ◽  
Manuel Martín-Díaz ◽  
Luciano Mignini ◽  
Khalid Saeed Khan ◽  
Rubén Trigueros ◽  
...  

Objectives: To assess shared decision-making (SDM) knowledge, attitude and application among health professionals involved in breast cancer (BC) treatment. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study based on an online questionnaire, sent by several professional societies to health professionals involved in BC management. There were 26 questions which combined demographic and professional data with some items measured on a Likert-type scale. Results: The participation (459/541; 84.84%) and completion (443/459; 96.51%) rates were high. Participants strongly agreed or agreed in 69.57% (16/23) of their responses. The majority stated that they knew of SDM (mean 4.43 (4.36–4.55)) and were in favour of its implementation (mean 4.58 (4.51–4.64)). They highlighted that SDM practice was not adequate due to lack of resources (3.46 (3.37–3.55)) and agreed on policies that improved its implementation (3.96 (3.88–4.04)). The main advantage of SDM for participants was patient satisfaction (38%), and the main disadvantage was the patients’ paucity of knowledge to understand their disease (24%). The main obstacle indicated was the lack of time and resources (40%). Conclusions: New policies must be designed for adequate training of professionals in integrating SDM in clinical practice, preparing them to use SDM with adequate resources and time provided.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document