Phase III Randomized Trial of Intravenous Cisplatin Plus a 24- or 96-Hour Infusion of Paclitaxel in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (28) ◽  
pp. 4466-4471 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Spriggs ◽  
Mark F. Brady ◽  
Luis Vaccarello ◽  
Daniel L. Clarke-Pearson ◽  
Robert A. Burger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology Group ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer ◽  
Results Of Treatment ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Purpose This study was undertaken to assess if prolonged paclitaxel administration in combination with cisplatin improves overall survival (OS) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patients and Methods Eligible patients with suboptimal stage III or IV EOC, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer were randomly allocated to receive six cycles of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and either paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 during 24 hours (arm 1) or paclitaxel 120 mg/m2 during 96 hours (arm 2). Results Planned accrual was 324 patients; 293 were enrolled before the study was closed as a result of a scheduled interim futility analysis. There were 13 ineligible patients; thus, 140 patients in each arm were assessable. In arm 1, 80% of patients completed all six cycles compared with 83% of patients in arm 2. Grade 4 granulocytopenia was more common in arm 1 (79% v 54%; P < .001) whereas grade 3 or worse anemia was more severe in arm 2 (6% v 18%; P < .003). The median progression-free survival was 1.03 years for arm 1 versus 1.05 years for arm 2. The median OS was 2.49 and 2.54 years for arms 1 and 2, respectively. There have been 237 reported deaths. The relative death rate was approximately 12% greater in arm 2 (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.860 to 1.45). Conclusion Patients with advanced EOC have a relatively poor prognosis. The results of treatment with cisplatin and paclitaxel are not significantly improved by prolonging the paclitaxel infusion from 24 to 96 hours.

Does Severe Anemia Caused by Dose-Dense Paclitaxel-Carboplatin Combination Therapy Have an Effect on the Survival of Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer? Retrospective Analysis of the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group 3016 Trial

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1585-1591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seisuke Kumagai ◽  
Toru Sugiyama ◽  
Tadahiro Shoji ◽  
Hirofumi Michimae ◽  
Noriyuki Katsumata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology Group ◽  
Severe Anemia ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Median Progression Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Dense

IntroductionTo evaluate the incidence of anemia in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer receiving paclitaxel-carboplatin combination therapy (TC) using data from the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) 3016 trial, and to examine the effect of severe anemia on survival during dose-dense TC.MethodsRetrospective analysis was conducted in patients enrolled in the JGOG 3016 trial who underwent at least one cycle of the protocol therapy (n = 622). Hemoglobin values at enrollment and during each cycle of TC were collected. One-to-one matching was performed between patients with and patients without grade 3/4 anemia during TC (anemia and nonanemia groups) to adjust the baseline characteristics of the patients. The cumulative survival curve and median progression-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsGrades 2 to 4 anemia was observed in 19.8% of patients before first-line TC. The incidence of grade 3/4 anemia rapidly increased to 56.1% after the fourth cycle of dose-dense TC. After matching, the median progression-free survival in the anemia (hemoglobin <8.0 g/dL) and nonanemia (hemoglobin >8.0 g/dL) groups was 777 and 1100 days, respectively (P = 0.3493) for patients receiving dose-dense TC. The median progression-free survival in patients receiving conventional TC was similar between the 2 groups.ConclusionsThe difference in progression-free survival between patients with epithelial ovarian cancer with and those without severe anemia during TC was not statistically significant, but for patients receiving dose-dense TC, severe anemia seems to have prognostic relevance. Prospective trials are needed to investigate whether the optimal management of chemotherapy-induced anemia, including appropriate use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, would further improve the survival of patients with ovarian cancer receiving dose-dense TC.

scholarly journals Bevacizumab use in the frontline, maintenance and recurrent settings for ovarian cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 225-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn E Haunschild ◽  
Krishnansu S Tewari
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
The Us ◽  
Us Fda

On 13 June 2018, Genentech, Inc. issued a press release announcing that the US FDA had approved the antiangiogenesis drug, bevacizumab, in combination with chemotherapy for frontline and maintenance therapy for women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. Regulatory approval was based on the National Cancer Institute-sponsored Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) protocol 0218, the Phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multi-center and multi-national clinical trial that met its primary end point, progression-free survival. Bevacizumab is now approved in the frontline, platinum-sensitive recurrent and platinum-resistant recurrent settings for epithelial ovarian cancer. This review will address the broad range of clinical trials addressing the efficacy of bevacizumab use in ovarian cancer.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Cisplatin With or Without Topotecan in Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (21) ◽  
pp. 4626-4633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry J. Long ◽  
Brian N. Bundy ◽  
Edward C. Grendys ◽  
Jo Ann Benda ◽  
D. Scott McMeekin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Cervix Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology Group ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose On the basis of reported activity of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) or topotecan plus cisplatin in advanced cervix cancer, we undertook a randomized trial comparing these combinations versus cisplatin alone, to determine whether survival is improved with either combination compared with cisplatin alone, and to compare toxicities and quality of life (QOL) among the regimens. Patients and Methods Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive cisplatin 50 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (CPT); cisplatin 50 mg/m2 day 1 plus topotecan 0.75 mg/m2 days 1 to 3 every 3 weeks (CT); or methotrexate 30 mg/m2 days 1, 15, and 22, vinblastine 3 mg/m2 days 2, 15, and 22, doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 day 2, and cisplatin 70 mg/m2 day 2 every 4 weeks (MVAC). Survival was the primary end point; response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) were secondary end points. QOL data are reported separately. Results The MVAC arm was closed by the Data Safety Monitoring Board after four treatment-related deaths occurred among 63 patients, and is not included in this analysis. Two hundred ninety-four patients enrolled onto the remaining regimens: 146 to CPT and 147 to CT. Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity was more common with CT. Patients receiving CT had statistically superior outcomes to those receiving CPT, with median overall survival of 9.4 and 6.5 months (P = .017), median PFS of 4.6 and 2.9 months (P = .014), and response rates of 27% and 13%, respectively. Conclusion This is the first randomized phase III trial to demonstrate a survival advantage for combination chemotherapy over cisplatin alone in advanced cervix cancer.

scholarly journals Phase II Evaluation of Pemetrexed in the Treatment of Recurrent or Persistent Platinum-Resistant Ovarian or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma: A Study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (16) ◽  
pp. 2686-2691 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Miller ◽  
John A. Blessing ◽  
Carolyn N. Krasner ◽  
Robert S. Mannel ◽  
Parviz Hanjani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology Group ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Delay

Purpose To estimate the antitumor activity of pemetrexed in patients with persistent or recurrent platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer and to determine the nature and degree of toxicities. Patients and Methods A phase II trial was conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Patients must have had cancer that had progressed on platinum-based primary chemotherapy or recurred within 6 months. Pemetrexed at a dose of 900 mg/m2 was to be administered as an intravenous infusion over 10 minutes every 21 days. Dose delay and adjustment was permitted for toxicity. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable adverse effects. Results From July 6, 2004, to August 23, 2006, 51 patients were entered. A total of 259 cycles (median, four; range one to 19 cycles) of pemetrexed were administered, with 40% of patients receiving six or more cycles. Overall, the treatment was well tolerated. More serious toxicities (grade 3 and 4) included neutropenia in 42%, leukopenia in 25%, anemia in 15%, and constitutional in 15% of patients. No treatment-related deaths were reported. One patient (2%) had a complete and nine patients (19%) had partial responses, with a median duration response of 8.4 months. Seventeen patients (35%) had stable disease for a median of 4.1 months. Eighteen patients (38%) had increasing disease. Three patients (6%) were not assessable. Median progression-free survival was 2.9 months, and overall survival was 11.4 months. Conclusion Pemetrexed has sufficient activity in the treatment of recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer at the dose and schedule tested to warrant further investigation.

scholarly journals Counterpoint: Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: An Investigational Treatment in Ovarian Cancer

2004 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 555-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. Ozols
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Systemic Circulation ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology Group ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Phase Ii Trials

Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy in ovarian cancer has been studied since 1978. Numerous phase II trials have been performed, which have shown that higher levels can be obtained in the peritoneal cavity compared with systemic circulation after administration of cytoxic agents in a large volume via a semi-permanent catheter. Three randomized trials have been performed in patients with ovarian cancer comparing different IP regimens to standard therapy with intravenous agents. The last two trials from the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) and the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) compared two different IP regimens versus standard therapy with intravenous cisplatin plus paclitaxel. Although an improvement in progression-free survival was reported for the IP regimens, they have been associated with unacceptable toxicity, and no IP regimen can be considered standard therapy. Maintenance therapy with IP cisplatin also failed to improve survival in patients who obtained complete remission after intravenous chemotherapy. The GOG is considering another phase III trial of IP therapy that will compare a carboplatin-based regimen versus standard therapy with intravenous paclitaxel plus carboplatin. Unless such a trial shows an improvement in clinical outcome, intravenous carboplatin plus paclitaxel remains the standard of care and IP chemotherapy should not be used outside of a clinical trial.

Phase III Randomized Study of Cisplatin Versus Paclitaxel Versus Cisplatin and Paclitaxel in Patients With Suboptimal Stage III or IV Ovarian Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franco M. Muggia ◽  
Patricia S. Braly ◽  
Mark F. Brady ◽  
Gregory Sutton ◽  
Theodore H. Niemann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Death Rate ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology Group ◽  
Treatment Groups

PURPOSE: To assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with suboptimally debulked epithelial ovarian cancer receiving cisplatin (100 mg/m2) or 24-hour infusion paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) or the combination of paclitaxel (135 mg/m2) followed by cisplatin (75 mg/m2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: After stratification for disease measurability, patients were randomized to receive six cycles of one of the treatments every 3 weeks. If measurable, complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) was determined. RESULTS: Six hundred fourteen of 648 patients who entered onto the trial were eligible. Monotherapies were discontinued more frequently (cisplatin because of toxicity or patient refusal [17%], and paclitaxel because of progression [20%]) compared with the combination therapy (7% and 6%, respectively). Neutropenia, fever, and alopecia were more severe with paclitaxel-containing regimens; whereas anemia, thrombocytopenia, neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and gastrointestinal toxicity were more severe with cisplatin-containing regimens. The CR/PR rates on paclitaxel monotherapy were significantly lower compared with the cisplatin regimens (42% v 67%, respectively; P < .001). The relative hazard (RH) of first progression or death was significantly greater among those randomized to paclitaxel (RH = 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15 to 1.73; P < .001) when compared with cisplatin; however, RH did not differ significantly between the two cisplatin regimens (RH = 1.06; 95% CI, 0.895 to 1.30). Relative to cisplatin, the death rate on paclitaxel was 15% greater (RH = 1.15; 95% CI, 0.929 to 1.42), and the death rate on the combination treatment was 1% less (RH = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.795 to 1.23). These differences among treatment groups were not statistically significant (P = .31). CONCLUSION: Cisplatin alone or in combination yielded superior response rates and PFS relative to paclitaxel. However, OS was similar in all three arms, and the combination therapy had a better toxicity profile. Therefore, the combination of cisplatin and paclitaxel remains the preferred initial treatment option.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document