Effect of Molecular Disease Subsets on Disease-Free Survival in Randomized Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trials for Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (28) ◽  
pp. 4679-4683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lajos Pusztai ◽  
Kristine Broglio ◽  
Fabrice Andre ◽  
W. Fraser Symmans ◽  
Kenneth R. Hess ◽  
...  

Purpose The majority of estrogen receptor (ER)–positive cancers are sensitive to endocrine therapy and may not derive much further benefit from chemotherapy, but a subset are potentially chemotherapy sensitive. Molecular diagnostic tests allow the identification of these various subsets with some accuracy. The goal of the current analysis was to examine how the proportion of cases in the various risk (recurrence score [RS]) categories of a commercially available multigene assay influences the power of randomized trials to show benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods We modeled 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) for hypothetical, two-arm clinical trials that randomly assigned patients with ER-positive breast cancer to endocrine therapy alone or endocrine therapy plus chemotherapy. We varied the proportion of patients in low, intermediate, and high RS categories and used DFS estimates for each risk group based on results from the Southwest Oncology Group 8814 study. Results The probability of observing significant improvement in DFS as a result of chemotherapy decreases as the proportion of patients in the low RS category increases. For example, if a trial is designed with 80% power and the actual proportion of low RS patients accrued to the study increases from 40% to 60%, the power drops to 63%. Conclusion Variable accrual of low RS patients into different randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trials may partly explain contradictory results in the literature. Studies can be underpowered to detect improvement with chemotherapy as a result of inclusion of too many patients with low RS. Future adjuvant studies for ER-positive breast cancer will need to consider stratifying patients by molecular subtype.

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 976-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Craig Henderson ◽  
Donald A. Berry ◽  
George D. Demetri ◽  
Constance T. Cirrincione ◽  
Lori J. Goldstein ◽  
...  

Purpose: This study was designed to determine whether increasing the dose of doxorubicin in or adding paclitaxel to a standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for breast cancer patients would prolong time to recurrence and survival. Patients and Methods: After surgical treatment, 3,121 women with operable breast cancer and involved lymph nodes were randomly assigned to receive a combination of cyclophosphamide (C), 600 mg/m2, with one of three doses of doxorubicin (A), 60, 75, or 90 mg/m2, for four cycles followed by either no further therapy or four cycles of paclitaxel at 175 mg/m2. Tamoxifen was given to 94% of patients with hormone receptor–positive tumors. Results: There was no evidence of a doxorubicin dose effect. At 5 years, disease-free survival was 69%, 66%, and 67% for patients randomly assigned to 60, 75, and 90 mg/m2, respectively. The hazard reductions from adding paclitaxel to CA were 17% for recurrence (adjusted Wald χ2 P = .0023; unadjusted Wilcoxon P = .0011) and 18% for death (adjusted P = .0064; unadjusted P = .0098). At 5 years, the disease-free survival (± SE) was 65% (± 1) and 70% (± 1), and overall survival was 77% (± 1) and 80% (± 1) after CA alone or CA plus paclitaxel, respectively. The effects of adding paclitaxel were not significantly different in subsets defined by the protocol, but in an unplanned subset analysis, the hazard ratio of CA plus paclitaxel versus CA alone was 0.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.59 to 0.86) for those with estrogen receptor–negative tumors and only 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.07) for patients with estrogen receptor–positive tumors, almost all of whom received adjuvant tamoxifen. The additional toxicity from adding four cycles of paclitaxel was generally modest. Conclusion: The addition of four cycles of paclitaxel after the completion of a standard course of CA improves the disease-free and overall survival of patients with early breast cancer.


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (16) ◽  
pp. 2636-2643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrice Andre ◽  
Kristine Broglio ◽  
Henri Roche ◽  
Miguel Martin ◽  
John R. Mackey ◽  
...  

PurposeSeveral adjuvant chemotherapy trials suggested that cytotoxic treatment is less effective in patients with estrogen receptor (ER) –positive breast cancers. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of adjuvant docetaxel and anthracycline therapy according to ER expression in two randomized clinical trials.Patients and MethodsPooled data from two randomized trials, BCIRG001 and PACS01, were examined. Hazard ratios for recurrence and survival were estimated by Cox proportional hazards models and were adjusted for clinical variables. Interaction between docetaxel and ER expression was tested.ResultsER status was available for 3,329 patients (95% of all randomly assigned patients), of whom 75% (n = 2,493) were ER positive. Docetaxel therapy was associated with a 30% reduction in the risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.91) in ER-positive patients and a 31% reduction (HR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.94) in ER-negative patients. Docetaxel therapy was associated with a 21% reduction in the risk of recurrence (HR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93) in ER-positive patients and a 31% reduction (HR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.97) in ER-negative patients. The interaction between docetaxel therapy and ER status was not statistically significant for either overall survival (P = .87) or disease-free survival (P = .30). ER expression was also not predictive for docetaxel efficacy when it was analyzed as a semi-continuous variable based on percent of positive cells by immunohistochemistry (test for heterogeneity, P = .56 and .86 for overall survival and disease-free survival, respectively).ConclusionIn the pooled analysis of these two trials, docetaxel did not have a statistically significantly different effect on the risk of recurrence or death in ER-positive and ER-negative patients.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (36) ◽  
pp. 4477-4484 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M.S. Bartlett ◽  
Kenneth J. Bloom ◽  
Tammy Piper ◽  
Thomas J. Lawton ◽  
Cornelis J.H. van de Velde ◽  
...  

PurposeSome postmenopausal patients with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer remain at high risk of relapse despite endocrine therapy and, in addition, might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. The challenge is to prospectively identify such patients. The Mammostrat test uses five immunohistochemical markers to stratify patients regarding recurrence risk and may inform treatment decisions. We tested the efficacy of this panel in the Tamoxifen versus Exemestane Adjuvant Multicenter (TEAM) trial.Patients and MethodsPathology blocks from 4,598 TEAM patients were collected, and tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed. The cohort was 47% node-positive, and 36% of patients in the cohort were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Triplicate 0.6-mm2TMA cores were stained, and positivity for p53, HTF9C, CEACAM5, NDRG1, and SLC7A5 was assessed. Cases were assigned a Mammostrat risk score, and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed.ResultsIn multivariate regression analyses, which were corrected for conventional clinicopathologic markers, Mammostrat provided significant additional information on DRFS after endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor (ER) –positive node-negative patients (n = 1,226) who did not receive chemotherapy (P = .004). Additional analyses in all patients not exposed to chemotherapy, irrespective of nodal status (n = 2,559) and in the entire cohort (n = 3,837) showed Mammostrat scores provided additional information on DRFS in these groups (P = .001 and P < .001, respectively; multivariate analyses). No differences were seen between the two endocrine treatment regimens.ConclusionThe Mammostrat score predicts DRFS for patients treated with exemestane and patients treated with tamoxifen followed by exemestane irrespective of nodal status and chemotherapy. The ability of this test to provide additional outcome data after treatment provides additional evidence of its use in risk stratification of ER-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer.


Oncotarget ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (51) ◽  
pp. 4722-4734
Author(s):  
Michael Rees ◽  
Chris Smith ◽  
Peter Barrett-Lee ◽  
Steve Hiscox

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document