Clinical outcomes of patients with breast cancer in a phase I clinic: The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1054-1054
Author(s):  
J. J. Wheler ◽  
A. Tsimberidou ◽  
S. Moulder ◽  
M. Cristofanill ◽  
D. Hong ◽  
...  

1054 Background: Patients with metastatic breast cancer refractory to standard therapy are eligible for phase I trials. We assessed prognostic factors and clinical outcomes for patients with breast cancer in a phase I clinic focused on targeted agents. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of sequential patients with metastatic breast cancer who presented to our phase I clinic from September 2004 to May 2008. We assessed the relationship between overall survival and patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics using both univariate and multivariate (Cox proportional hazard model) analyses. Results: Ninety-two patients were identified with median age of 53 years (range 28 to 83 years). The median number of prior therapies was 5 (range 1 to 16). The median follow-up of surviving patients is 7.4 months. The median overall survival is 6.7 (95% CI: 5.2, 9.7) months. In univariate analysis, factors predicting shorter survival were elevated Ca-125 (p = 0.001) (Ca27.29 was not significant), albumin < 3.5 g/dL (p = 0.002), worsening ECOG performance status (p = 0.004), absolute neutrophil count < 7.3 x 109/L (p = 0.004), ≥ 10 prior treatment regimens (p = 0.008), ≥ 5 prior chemotherapy-only regimens (p = 0.008), body mass index (BMI) < 25 (p = 0.018), and elevated platelet counts (p = 0.007). In multivariate analysis, independent factors predicting shorter survival were ≥10 prior treatments (vs. <10 prior treatments) (HR = 3.27; 95% CI 1.37, 7.81; p = 0.0077), ECOG performance status 2–3 (vs. 0–1) (HR = 2.92; 95% CI 1.28, 6.66; p = 0.01), and albumin < 3.5 g/dL (vs. > 3.5g/dL) (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.88; 95% CI; 1.41, 5.89; p = 0.004). Of 78 patients treated on a first phase I trial, 14 (18%) demonstrated stable disease (SD), with a median duration of 18 weeks (range 10–25). Of those 19 patients treated on a second phase I trial, 6 (32%) had SD with a median duration of 12 weeks (range 8–17). Two of 4 (50%) patients treated on a third phase I trial had SD with a median duration of 20 weeks (range 16–24). Conclusions: Patients with metastatic breast cancer referred for our phase I studies had a median survival of 6.6 months. In this preliminary analysis, independent factors predicting shorter survival were ≥ 10 prior treatments, worsening ECOG performance status and low albumin levels. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Autumn J. McRee ◽  
Paul K. Marcom ◽  
Dominic T. Moore ◽  
William C. Zamboni ◽  
Zachary A. Kornblum ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S24
Author(s):  
R. Salyadori ◽  
A. Mlchelotti ◽  
E. Baldini ◽  
A. Gennari ◽  
C. Tibaldi ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 390-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susana M. Campos ◽  
Suzanne T. Berlin ◽  
Leroy M. Parker ◽  
Wendy Y. Chen ◽  
Craig A. Bunnell ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandra Ivars Rubio ◽  
Juan Carlos Yufera ◽  
Pilar de la Morena ◽  
Ana Fernández Sánchez ◽  
Esther Navarro Manzano ◽  
...  

AbstractThe prognostic impact of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has been previously evaluated in early and metastatic mixed breast cancer cohorts or without considering other relevant prognostic factors. Our aim was to determine whether NLR prognostic and predictive value in MBC was dependent on other clinical variables. We studied a consecutive retrospective cohort of patients with MBC from a single centre, with any type of first line systemic treatment. The association of NLR at diagnosis of metastasis with progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Cox univariate and multivariate proportional hazard models. In the full cohort, that included 263 MBC patients, a higher than the median (>2.32) NLR was significantly associated with OS in the univariate analysis (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.00–1.83), but the association was non-significant (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.80–1.56) when other clinical covariates (performance status, stage at diagnosis, CNS involvement, visceral disease and visceral crisis) were included in the multivariate analysis. No significant association was observed for PFS. In conclusion, MBC patients with higher baseline NLR had worse overall survival, but the prognostic impact of NLR is likely derived from its association with other relevant clinical prognostic factors.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. viii91-viii92
Author(s):  
J. Cortes Castan ◽  
M. Martín ◽  
S. Pernas Simon ◽  
P. Gomez Pardo ◽  
S. Lopez-Tarruella ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (16_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2530-2530
Author(s):  
P. Kiewe ◽  
S. Hasmüller ◽  
S. Kahlert ◽  
M. Heinrigs ◽  
B. Rack ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1112-1112
Author(s):  
J. Fasano ◽  
D. Hershman ◽  
Y. Novik ◽  
K. Blozie ◽  
A. Tiersten

1112 Background: The combination of anthracyclines and taxanes are effective in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Liposomal doxorubicin has been shown to be as effective as doxorubicin with less toxicity and it can be combined safely with docetaxel. Methods: Monthly liposomal doxorubicin (30 mg/m2) in combination with weekly docetaxel (30 mg/m2) was evaluated in women with metastatic breast cancer. Cycles were continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Radiologic assessment was performed every two months. The primary outcome was time to progression. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate, median survival and toxicity. Results: Between 12/2002 and 9/2005, 12 women were enrolled and received this combination as front- line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. The mean age was 46.5 (31–60) years. Nine (75%) patients had tumors that were ER+ or PR+. Five (41.7%) women had tumors that over-expressed her-2/neu. Ten women had an EGOG performance status of 1. Two women had an ECOG performance status of 2. The median number of cycles received was 4 (1–12). Four (25%) women were taken off study due to intolerable toxicity and 7 (58.3%) due to progressive disease. One (8.3%) woman remains progression free. Ten (83.3%) women had a partial response, one (8.3%) woman had a mixed response and one (8.3%) was not evaluable for response to chemotherapy. The median time to progression was 21 (6–52) weeks. Three women remain alive with disease. One woman remains alive and progression-free. Ten (83%) patients experienced Grade 3/4 toxicities, including: stomatits 6 (50%), nausea/vomiting 1 (8.3%), neutropenia 3 (25%), infection 3 (25%), dyspnea 2 (16.7%), and PPE 1 (8.3). Conclusions: Monthly liposomal doxorubicin plus weekly docetaxel in women with metastatic breast cancer resulted in an encouraging response, but was difficult to tolerate. Further evaluation of this combination with improved supportive care may be warranted. [Table: see text]


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1105-1105 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Anton ◽  
A. Lluch ◽  
A. Casado ◽  
M. Provencio ◽  
M. Muñoz ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1066-1066
Author(s):  
S. L. Moulder ◽  
E. Rivera ◽  
J. Ensor ◽  
A. Gonzalez-Angulo ◽  
M. Christofanilli ◽  
...  

1066 Background: Inhibition of mTOR with everolimus (E) may improve efficacy in combination with docetaxel (D), but both drugs are metabolized by CYP3A4, thus a pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction may also exist. Methods: 15 patients (pts) with MBC were treated with docetaxel and everolimus using the continuous reassessment method (CRM) to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Docetaxel doses were 40–75 mg/m2 IV on day 1 of a 21 day cycle. Everolimus doses were 20–50 mg PO on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle (except cycle 2, where only day 8 was given to allow single agent PK analyses of both drugs). Response was measured every 2 cycles using RECIST. Results: Median age= 58 years and 77% of pts had >2 prior chemotherapies for MBC. Initially 2 of 2 pts treated (D= 75 mg/m2, E= 30 mg) developed DLT (neutropenic fever/infection), prompting a mandatory PK evaluation for all pts enrolled in subsequent cohorts. A second cohort of 3 patients (D=60 mg/m2, E=20mg) had no DLT, but no pts received day 8 of E due to grade 3–4 neutropenia. PK analyses demonstrated a 42% lowered (-42%) D clearance at the 60 mg/m2 in the presence of E (n=1). Subsequent cohorts were accrued at D=40 mg/m2 with escalating doses of E (Table). For the entire group, an 18% decrease (-18%) in D clearance was observed when D was administered concomitantly with E. High interpatient variability of D clearance was observed (range +16% to -135%). No pts had CR/PR, but 6 had SD>4 cycles and 2 had SD=8 cycles. Conclusions: Weekly everolimus appears to cause widely variable and unpredictable changes in docetaxel clearance making this combination unfeasible. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1072-1072
Author(s):  
Ahmad Awada ◽  
Philippe Georges Aftimos ◽  
Emiliano Calvo ◽  
Valentina Boni ◽  
Victor Moreno ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document