Phase II study of preoperative panitumumab, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin with concurrent radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Preliminary safety results (StarPan /STAR-02 Study)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4110-4110
Author(s):  
C. Pinto ◽  
F. Di Fabio ◽  
E. Maiello ◽  
P. Di Tullio ◽  
S. Pini ◽  
...  

4110 Background: The aim of this phase II study is to assess the activity of preoperative external radiotherapy combined with panitumumab, oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced rectal cancer patients (pts). Methods: Pts entering the study had histologically-proven rectal adenocarcinoma, either uT3N+ or T4 N-/+ stage, with location <12 cm from the anal margin. Panitumumab was administered at a dose of 6 mg/kg IV, 2 weeks before the start of chemoradiotherapy, and then in combination with chemoradiotherapy, every 2 weeks for 3 times. 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin were administered according to an established schedule of STAR-01 Study (oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2 IV weekly for six times, and 5- fluorouracil 225 mg/m2/day continuous infusion IV d 1–38). Radiotherapy was delivered up to a dose of 50.4 Gy in daily fractions of 1.8 Gy. Rectal surgery was performed 7–8 weeks after the end of neoadjuvant treatment. Eight courses of adjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 plus panitumumab at a dose of 6 mg/kg, every 2 weeks, were given after surgery. The primary endpoint of the study was the complete pathological response rate. Results: From February 2007 to December 2008, 35 out of the 55 planned pts were enrolled. Twenty nine pts completed neoadjuvant treatment and 20 underwent surgery (15 pts ongoing). The characteristics of 29 pts were: males 19 (65.5%) and females 10 (34.5%); median age 58 years (range 39–78); median Karnofsky PS 100 (range 70–100); stage: uT3N+ 22 (75.9%), uT4N- 3 (10.3%), uT4N+ 4 (13.8%). The most frequent grade 1–4 side-effects were acneiform rash (96.2%), diarrhea (51.7%) and fatigue (14.3%). Grade 3 diarrhea was registered in 35.7% pts, and grade 3–4 cutaneous toxicity in 51.8%. No grade 3–4 hematological toxicity was found. The median cumulative dose of delivered radiotherapy was 50.4 Gy. The planned dose of panitumumab, 5-fluourouracil and oxaliplatin was administered in 83%, 72% and 67% of pts, respectively. Conclusions: Despite the moderate increase of diarrhea, these early results demonstrate that panitumumab can be safety added to 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin-based chemoradiotherapy, without compromising the concurrent radiotherapy dose. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3571-3571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mercedes Martinez Villacampa ◽  
Jaume Capdevila ◽  
Jose Luis Manzano ◽  
Carles Pericay ◽  
Ramon Salazar ◽  
...  

3571 Background: The addition of bevacizumab (BEV) to capecitabine (CAP)-based chemoradiation (CRT) has shown encouraging efficacy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), in nonrandomized studies. This randomized phase II study investigated the effect of adding BEV to preoperative CAP-based CRT in patients (pts), with LARC. Methods: The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR). A two-stage design was used. Assuming a minimum pCR rate of at least 15% in one of the arms, a difference between the two arms of 10%, and accepting a probability of correct selection of 87%, 41 pts per arm were needed. Patients with LARC (Stages II-III assessed by MRI) and ECOG PS <2 were randomized to concurrent radiotherapy 45Gy/25f/5 weeks + CAP (825mg/m²/bid) + BEV every 2 weeks (5 mg/kg for 3 doses) (arm A) or the same schedule without BEV (arm B). Surgery was scheduled 6-8 weeks after completing CRT. Results: 90 pts were randomized (arm A/B: 44/46). Patient’s characteristics were well balanced between both arms: male 61%, median age 62 years, median distance from anal verge 7 cm, T3 79%, N+ 87%. 40 (91%)/43 (93%) of pts (arm A/B) finalized the planned CRT + surgery treatment. Overall grade 3-4 toxicity rates were 18 % and 13% (arm A/B, p=0.50); no grade 3-4 hematological toxicity was reported. Postoperative complications were 19(43%)/17(37%)(arm A/B). Efficacy data on patients who actually underwent surgery are reported in the table. Conclusions: The addition of BEV to CAP-based preoperative CRT has shown to be feasible and safe in the local control of LARC. No differences in pCR were observed and longer follow-up is needed to assess the impact on survival endpoints. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS144-TPS144
Author(s):  
Paul Bernard Romesser ◽  
Emma B. Holliday ◽  
Tony Philip ◽  
Rocio Garcia-Carbonero ◽  
Jaume Capdevila ◽  
...  

TPS144 Background: Perioperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy, followed by total mesorectal excision, is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, 1/3 of these patients still develop distant metastases, indicating the need for more effective therapies. In addition, strategies that increase pathological complete response rates are needed to enable non-surgical management of LARC. DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) regulates a key DNA damage repair pathway for double-strand break repair. Peposertib (M3814), a potent, selective, orally administered DNA-PK inhibitor, has been shown to potentiate the effect of ionizing radiation in a human colon cancer xenograft model and several colon cancer cell lines. Peposertib is being investigated in several different trials across multiple indications. This Phase Ib/II study (NCT03770689) aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of the neoadjuvant treatment combination of peposertib, capecitabine, and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with LARC. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed and resectable Stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma are eligible. Induction chemotherapy is permitted, but residual disease must first be documented by MRI, digital rectal examination and endoscopy. Patients who received other anticancer therapies or those with prior pelvic RT are excluded. At open-label Phase Ib (open), 18–30 patients (n = 3 per cohort) will receive peposertib + capecitabine (orally, 825 mg/m2 twice daily [BID]) + RT (45–50.4 Gy), 5 days/week. Peposertib 50 mg once daily (QD) was the starting dose. Additional dose levels will range between 100─800 mg QD. Dose escalation is determined by the safety monitoring committee and guided by a Bayesian 2-parameter logistic regression model. At Phase II (planned), 150 patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive oral capecitabine (825 mg/m2 BID) + RT (45–50 Gy), with either oral peposertib (recommended phase II dose [RP2D] or placebo, QD for 5 days/week. Primary objectives are to define a maximum tolerated dose and RP2D (Phase Ib), and to evaluate the efficacy of peposertib + capecitabine + RT in terms of pathological/clinical complete response (Phase II). Secondary objectives include assessment of antitumor activity (Phase Ib), quality of life outcomes (Phase II), and PK of peposertib, and the safety and tolerability of the combination therapy (both phases). To date, one patient has received peposertib 50 mg QD, six patients peposertib 100 mg QD, three patients peposertib 150 mg QD, and three patients peposertib 250 mg QD. Clinical trial information: NCT03770689.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Margarita García ◽  
Mercedes Martinez-Villacampa ◽  
Cristina Santos ◽  
Valentin Navarro ◽  
Alex Teule ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document