SAMIT: Preliminary safety data from a 2x2 factorial randomized phase III trial to investigate weekly paclitaxel (PTX) followed by oral fluoropyrimidines (FPs) versus FPs alone as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients (pts) with gastric cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4017-4017 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Tsuburaya ◽  
K. Yoshida ◽  
M. Kobayashi ◽  
S. Yoshino ◽  
Y. Miyashita ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4024-4024
Author(s):  
Masanori Terashima ◽  
Takaki Yoshikawa ◽  
Junki Mizusawa ◽  
Souya Nunobe ◽  
Yasunori Nishida ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 72-72
Author(s):  
Michiya Kobayashi ◽  
Akira Tsuburaya ◽  
Kazuhiro Yoshida ◽  
Shigefumi Yoshino ◽  
Yumi Miyashita ◽  
...  

72 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine (FP) with or without platinum for gastric cancer (GC) has become standard almost worldwide; however, there has been no comparison among concurrent, sequential, and monotherapy. Paclitaxel (PTX) is one of key drugs in GC widely used as 2nd-line chemotherapy in Japan. Methods: SAMIT is a randomized, multicenter phase III study of FP (S1 or UFT) vs. PTX followed by FP in patients (pts) with gastric adenocarcinoma. Eligibility includes T3/T4, N0-2, M0 except for positive lavage cytology, chemotherapy- and radiotherapy- naive, being able to start chemotherapy 14 and 56 days after D2 gastrectomy. Pts received either UFT 267 mg/m2/day for 4w, q4w x 6 cycles (arm A); S1 80 mg/m2/day for 2w, q3w x 8 cycles (arm B); PTX 80 mg/m2 Day 1, 8 for the first 3w x 1 cycle, Day 1, 8, 15 q4w x 2 cycles, followed by UFT 267 mg/m2/day for 4w, q4w x 3 cycles (arm C); or PTX as in C, followed by S1 80 mg/m2/day for 2w, q3w x 4 cycles (arm D). The FP cycles was prolonged by 24w after ACTS-GC publication in 2007. Primary endpoint is disease-free survival and total number of patients was calculated to be1480 where 90% power for superiority of C+D group vs. A+B. The Independent Data Monitoring Committee undertook a review of the 1417 pts at the 2nd interim analysis in 2011. Results: Arm A (n=353), arm B (n=359), arm C (n=352), arm D (n=353) were well balanced for baseline factors. The compliance with UFT in arm A and S1 in B was 74% and 76% in the first 12 weeks, and 89% and 90% between week 37 and 48; that in arm C and D was 83% and 80% in the second 12 weeks, and 94% and 84% between week 37 and 48. Numbers of grade 3/4 hematological and non-hematological adverse events (AEs) were 3 and 46, 0 and 64, 5 and 35, and 16 and 67 for arm A, B, C, and D, respectively. Anorexia was the most common AE observed in 5.8%, 6.8%, 1.7%, and 5.1% for arm A, B, C, and D, respectively. There were 363/1323 (27%) deaths and 762/1323 (58%) of pts survived disease free. Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy with sequential PTX and FP for GC was safe and the compliance of the FP part could be better than that of FP monotherapy. The final efficacy results will be formally assessed in 2012.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 196-196
Author(s):  
Takanobu Yamada ◽  
Takaki Yoshikawa ◽  
Junki Mizusawa ◽  
Hitoshi Katai ◽  
Akinori Takagane ◽  
...  

196 Background: The phase III trial (JCOG1104), comparing between 4- (6 months) and 8-course (1 year) of S-1 as the adjuvant chemotherapy for pathological stage II gastric cancer, registered a total of 590 patients between Feb. 2012 and Mar. 2017 until the study was terminated due to futility at the interim analysis (relapse-free survival at 3 years: 93.1% in the 8-course group and 89.8% in the 4-course group). Non-inferiority of the 4-course to the 8-course was not shown, highlighting a continuation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for one year. This preplanned exploratory study investigated the risk factors for time to treatment failure (TTF). Methods: TTF was defined as the time from randomization to the date of termination of S-1 before the planned treatment period, relapse, or any cause of death, whichever came first, and censored on the last date of contact for a surviving patient after completing the planned treatment or the last date of S-1 in the patients under the protocol treatment when the trial was closed. The risk factor of TTF was analyzed by Cox proportional hazard model using the variables of the planned treatment period, PS, age, sex, body weight loss (percentile of the body weight loss at the registration compared with that before surgery: BWL), albumin, lymphocyte count, creatinine clearance (Ccr), extent of gastrectomy (total gastrectomy vs. others), surgical approach (open vs. laparoscopic approach), and blood loss during surgery. As TTF did not reach 50%, proportion of treatment completion was compared. Results: Among 590 registered patients, this study included 530 patients (273 in the 8-course group and 257 in the 4-course group) by excluding 24 ineligible patients, 7 patients who did not start the protocol treatment, and 29 patients with unavailable data for variables. Proportion of treatment completion at 6 months estimated by Kaplan-Meier method were 89.2% in the 4-course group and 84.6% in the 8-course group ( P=0.1204), and that at 1 year was 73.6% in the 8-course group. Risk factors of TTF before 6M identified by multivariable analysis with stepwise selection method including both groups, in which all patients completed treatment were censored at 6 months, were the planned treatment period (4-courses vs. 8-course, HR 0.611, 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.375-0.996, P=0.0482), age (continuous value, HR 1.039, 95% CI 1.004-1.074, P=0.0266), and Ccr (<80 vs. >80 ml/min, HR 1.943, 95% CI 1.105-3.415, P=0.0211). As for the TTF in the 8-course group, BWL (>10% vs <10%, HR 2.167, 95% CI 1.269-3.703, P=0.0046) and Ccr (<80 vs. >80 ml/min, HR 1.900, 95% CI 1.186-3.045, P=0.0076) were independent risk factors. Conclusions: Compared to 8-course, 4-course of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a higher 6-month proportion of treatment completion. When planning the adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 for one year, BWL (>10%) and low Ccr (<80 ml/min) were risk factors for treatment failure. Clinical trial information: UMIN000007306.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document