Feasibility of sentinel node biopsy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: A pilot study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1120-1120
Author(s):  
Ariadna Tibau Martorell ◽  
Joan Duch ◽  
Maria Jesus Quintana ◽  
Laura Lopez Vilaro ◽  
Belen Ojeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Node Biopsy ◽  
Group A

1120 Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a widely used staging method for patients with early breast cancer. Neoadjuvant Therapy (NT) modifies the anatomical conditions in the breast and axilla, and thus reliability of SLNB after NT remains controversial. The aim of this study is to prospectively evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of this procedure in this particular group of patients. Methods: Between December 2007-2011, 69 patients (mean age 56 years) with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) were prospectively studied. Patients were T1-4, N0-1, M0. Prior to surgery, 61 patients received chemotherapy (CT) (adryamicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel) and 8 patients endocrine therapy (ET). Thirty nine patients were initially node-negative (cN0) and 30 patients had clinical/ultrasound node-positive confirmed by cytology (cN1) at presentation. All patients were clinical and ultrasound node-negative after NT. The study contained two groups of patients: group A (validation) included the first 29, associated with an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after NT, in order to validate the study, and group B included the last 40, only associated with an ALND when SLNB was positive or not found. Results: Whole SLNB identification rate was 89.9%, and no significant differences were found between patients initially cN0 (92%; 36/39) and initially cN1 (87%; 26/30). Four of 7 patients in whom SLNB was not found had residual nodal metastasis after NT (3 of them were initially cN1). Sentinel lymph nodes were successfully identified in 87% (7/8) of patients after ET and in 90% (55/61) of patients after CT. There was one false negative (FN) case after CT in group A (9% of overall false negative rate, initially cN0) and there were no FN cases after ET. Positive SLNB were higher in initially cN1 group (53%; 16/30) than in initially cN0 group (18%; 7/39). Conclusions: SLNB after NT (CT or ET) is safe and feasible in patients with LABC, not only in initially cN0 but also in initially cN1. It accurately predicts the status of the axilla and avoids unnecessary ALND.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Sentinel Node Biopsy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients Who Become Clinically Node-Negative after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Preliminary Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaji Thomas ◽  
Apurva Prakash ◽  
Vinay Goyal ◽  
Manju Bala Popli ◽  
Shilpi Agarwal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
False Negative ◽  
False Negative Rate ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Identification Rate

Introduction. Controversy continues over the appropriate timing of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We evaluated the feasibility and accuracy of SLN biopsy in LABC patients with cytology-proven axillary nodal metastasis who become clinically node-negative after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Materials. 30 consecutive patients with LABC, who had become clinically node-negative after 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, were included in the study. They were then subjected to SLN biopsy, axillary lymph node dissection, and breast surgery.Results. Sentinel nodes were successfully identified in 26 of the 30 patients, resulting in an identification rate of 86.67%, sensitivity of 83.33%, false negative rate of 20%, negative predictive value of 72.73%, and an overall accuracy of 88.46%. No complications were observed as a result of dye injection.Conclusions. SLN biopsy is feasible and safe in LABC patients with cytology-positive nodes who become clinically node-negative after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Our accuracy rate, identification rate, and false negative rate are comparable to those in node-negative LABC patients. SLN biopsy as a therapeutic option in LABC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a promising option which should be further investigated.

scholarly journals Identification of the sentinel lymph node using hemosiderin in locally advanced breast cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 612-618
Author(s):  
PAULO HENRIQUE WALTER DE AGUIAR ◽  
RANNIERE GURGEL FURTADO DE AQUINO ◽  
MAYARA MAIA ALVES ◽  
JULIO MARCUS SOUSA CORREIA ◽  
AYANE LAYNE DE SOUSA OLIVEIRA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Nodes ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Identification Rate

ABSTRACT Objective: to verify the agreement rate in the identification of sentinel lymph node using an autologous marker rich in hemosiderin and 99 Technetium (Tc99) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Methods: clinical trial phase 1, prospective, non-randomized, of 18 patients with breast cancer and clinically negative axilla stages T2=4cm, T3 and T4. Patients were submitted to sub-areolar injection of hemosiderin 48 hours prior to sentinel biopsy surgery, and the identification rate was compared at intraoperative period to the gold standard marker Tc99. Agreement between methods was determined by Kappa index. Results: identification rate of sentinel lymph node was 88.9%, with a medium of two sentinel lymph nodes per patients. The study identified sentinel lymph nodes stained by hemosiderin in 83.3% patients (n=15), and, compared to Tc99 identification, the agreement rate was 94.4%. Conclusion: autologous marker rich in hemosiderin was effective to identify sentinel lymph nodes in locally advanced breast cancer patients.

5063 POSTER Improvement of Neoadjuvant Therapy Response by Using 4FE100C Vs 6FE100C in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. S349
Author(s):  
N. Ramirez-Torres ◽  
A. Perez-Puente ◽  
J. Asbun-Bojalil ◽  
E. Ruiz-Garcia ◽  
L.A. Valenzuela-Martinez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Therapy Response ◽  
Advanced Breast

Radioimmunoguided surgery after primary treatment of locally advanced breast cancer.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 1599-1603 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Percivale ◽  
S Bertoglio ◽  
P Meszaros ◽  
G Canavese ◽  
F Cafiero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Primary Chemotherapy ◽  
Radioimmunoguided Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

PURPOSE To assess the role of radioimmunoguided surgery (RIGS) using a handheld intraoperative gamma-detecting probe (GDP) to identify neoplastic disease after primary chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients injected with iodine 125-labeled monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-one patients with histologically documented LABC were treated with a combined modality approach. After three courses of primary chemotherapy and before modified radical mastectomy, the 125I-radiolabeled MAbs B72.3 (anti-TAG72) and FO23C5 (anti-carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA]) were administered to 11 patients (group A) and 10 patients (group B), respectively. At surgery, a GDP was used to locate the primary tumor and to assess possible tumor multicentricity and the presence of ipsilateral axillary metastases. Routine pathologic examination was performed in neoplastic and normal tissue specimens of all 21 patients. In addition, immunohistochemical assay for TAG72 and CEA expression was performed. RESULTS In group A patients, RIGS identified primary tumor in seven of 11 patients (63.3%) and unpalpable multicentric tumor lesions were located in two of four (50%). Positive axillary lymph nodes were histologically documented in eight of 11 patients (72.7%) and RIGS identified three of eight (37.5%). In group B, RIGS located the primary tumor lesion in four of 10 patients (40%); in two cases, the tumor was not clinically evident. Multicentricity was observed in one of two patients and lymph node involvement in three of nine (33.3%). No false-positive results were observed in either group A or B. CONCLUSION RIGS appears to be a safe and reliable technique. However, the MAbs used in this study are not sufficiently specific. RIGS represents a technique for which the full potential for intraoperative assessment of breast cancer lesions can be reached when more specific antibodies become readily available.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document