Phase I study of sirolimus plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors: A Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas (GEIS) study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3096-3096
Author(s):  
Juan Martin Liberal ◽  
Marta Gil ◽  
Laura Jimenez ◽  
Maria Ochoa de Olza ◽  
Carmen Munoz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Mtor Pathway ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Skin Biopsies ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

3096 Background: In preclinical studies, combination of sirolimus with gemcitabine enhances apoptosis in vitro and increases anti-tumor efficacy in vivo. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors, age 18-70 years, no prior mTOR inhibitor or gemcitabine, ECOG PS 0-1, and adequate hematological, renal and hepatic function, were enrolled in this phase I study to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and to identify the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of the combination of sirolimus and gemcitabine. A 3+3 dose escalation design with cohorts of 3-6 patients was used. Sirolimus was given po continuously. Gemcitabine was given iv 10mg/m2/minute on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Dose levels 1, 2 and 3 corresponded to sirolimus 2, 2 and 5mg/24h plus gemcitabine 800, 1000 and 1000mg/m2 respectively. After observing DLTs at higher dose level and poorer mTOR signaling inhibition at lower doses, a new cohort of sirolimus 5mg/24h plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 was added. Skin biopsies pre and post treatment were performed to assess the inhibition of mTOR pathway. Results: 19 patients were enrolled: median age 51 years (36-70); gender 12M, 7F. Median number of cycles was 4. Patients were treated at 4 dose levels, the MTD was reached at level 3 and the RD was: sirolimus 5mg/24h and gemcitabine 800mg/m2. 3 DLTs were observed, 1 at dose level 2 and 2 at dose level 3: transaminitis grade 3, thrombocytopenia grade 3 and thrombocytopenia grade 4. Other toxicities grade 1-2 included anemia, neutropenia, asthenia, mucositis and high cholesterol levels. 2 patients achieved partial response (1 uterine cervix cancer and 1 colon cancer). Immunohistochemistry of pS6 in skin biopsies showed significative inhibition of mTOR pathway at RD. PK parameters estimated were in agreement with those previously reported in the literature. No influence of sirolimus administration on gemcitabine clearance was found. Conclusions: Combination of sirolimus and gemcitabine is feasible and safe, allowing administration of active doses of both agents and achieving mTOR signaling inhibition. A phase II study to assess the activity of this combination in sarcomas is ongoing.

A phase I study of the humanized anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody (mAb) TheraCIM-h-R3 (nimotuzumab) in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13054-13054
Author(s):  
A. M. Brade ◽  
L. Siu ◽  
A. M. Oza ◽  
B. Southwood ◽  
M. De Borja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Skin Biopsies ◽  
Grade 3

13054 Background: Nimotuzumab is a humanized mAb against the extracellular ligand binding domain of EGFR. Although well tolerated when combined with radiotherapy in previous studies, the pharmacodynamics (PD) of nimotuzumab has not been elucidated. This phase I study was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and PD of nimotuzumab. Methods: Eligibility criteria included advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy and performance status of ECOG 0–2. Nimotuzumab was administered intravenously weekly × 6 and then every other week (6 weeks = 1 treatment cycle). Tumor and skin biopsies were obtained at baseline and after 2 weeks of treatment. Results: To date, 9 patients (7 m/2 f, median age 60, 7 colorectal cancer, ECOG 0:1:2 = 5:3:1, prior therapy 1:2:3+ = 1:3:5) have been treated on the first 2 dose levels (100 mg and 200 mg) for a total of 13 treatment cycles. The most common toxicities, mainly grade 1- 2, were lymphopenia (n = 8 patients), fatigue (n = 8), abnormal liver function tests (n = 7) and anemia (n = 6). Observed grade 3 toxicities include: pain (n = 3), hyponatremia (n = 2), elevated ALP (n = 2), fatigue (n = 1), hyperglycemia (n = 1) and hyperkalemia (n = 1). One patient at the first dose level experienced grade 3 fatigue, at least possibly attributable to nimotuzumab, and thus considered as a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). No DLT were observed in the expanded cohort and dose level 2. No skin toxicities were observed. Stable disease was seen in 3 patients with colorectal cancer. PD from tumor and skin biopsies will be presented, and may clarify the reason for the lack of skin toxicity. Conclusions: Overall nimotuzumab was well tolerated, with disease stabilization observed in heavily pretreated patients. Accrual continues at dose level 3 (400 mg) with one further planned dose level (800 mg). [Table: see text]

Phase I study of the HSP90 inhibitor AUY922 in combination with capecitabine as treatment for patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3564-3564
Author(s):  
Shubham Pant ◽  
Lowell L. Hart ◽  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Suzanne Fields Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Hsp90 Inhibition ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

3564 Background: Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) is a molecular chaperone involved in the maintenance and function of client proteins, many of which are integral to key oncogenic processes. AUY922 is a competitive inhibitor of HSP90. Preclinical evidence suggests potential synergy between HSP90 inhibition and fluorouracil. This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AUY922 in combination with standard dose of capecitabine as treatment for patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Pts with refractory solid tumors received AUY922 with capecitabine in a standard 3+3 dose escalation. Dose levels were capecitabine 1000mg/m2 PO BID d 1-14 of 21-day cycles, with escalating doses of AUY922 IV days 1, 8, and 15; the 6th dose level combined the MTD of AUY922 with capecitabine 1250mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), safety, and efficacy were evaluated. Results: 23 pts were treated at 6 dose levels: 22mg/m2 (n = 3); 28mg/m2 (n = 3); 40mg/m2 (n = 3); 55mg/m2 (n = 5); 70mg/m2 (n = 3); 70mg/m2 with capecitabine 1250mg/m2 (n= 6). No DLTs were observed until the 6th dose level (grade 3 diarrhea). Related adverse events (% grade 1/2; % grade 3/4) included: diarrhea (43%; 17%), fatigue (30%; 13%), nausea (39%; 0), hand-foot skin reaction (30%; 5%), anorexia (30%; 4%), vomiting (30%; 0), and darkening vision (26%; 0). Vision darkening, a class effect of HSP90 inhibitors, was reversible with drug hold and retreatment was possible. Two pts (9%) had hematologic G 3/4 events of neutropenia. Of the 19 pts evaluable for response, partial response was noted in 4 patients (colorectal, 2; breast, 1; stomach, 1); 2 had progressed on prior fluorouracil, and remained on treatment for 13-35 wks. Stable disease was noted in 8 pts (35% [colorectal, 5; pancreas, 2; breast, 1]) with a median duration of 25.5 wks (range: 11-44+). All 5 colorectal pts were refractory to 5-FU. Conclusions: The addition of AUY922 to standard dose capecitabine was well-tolerated at doses of up to 70mg/m2. Preliminary efficacy is encouraging, particularly as seen in pts previously resistant to fluorouracil, and warrants further investigation of this regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT01226732.

Phase I study of the HSP90 inhibitor AUY922 in combination with capecitabine as treatment for patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 475-475
Author(s):  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Lowell L. Hart ◽  
Shubham Pant ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Suzanne Fields Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Heat Shock Protein 90 ◽  
Competitive Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Grade 3

475 Background: Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) is a molecular chaperone involved in the maintenance and function of client proteins, many of which are integral to key oncogenic processes. AUY922 is a competitive inhibitor of HSP90, with demonstrated activity in a variety of preclinical models. Further preclinical evidence suggests potential synergy between inhibition of HSP90 and fluorouracil treatment (Burkitt et al. 2007). This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AUY922 in combination with standard dose of capecitabine as treatment for patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Patients with refractory solid tumors for which capecitabine was an appropriate therapy received AUY922 with capecitabine in a standard 3+3 dose escalation. Capecitabine 1000mg/m2 was administered twice daily for days 1-14 of 21-day cycles, with escalating doses of AUY922 administered by intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1, 8, and 15; the 6th dose level combined the MTD of AUY922 with capecitabine 1250mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), safety, and efficacy were evaluated. Results: 23 patients were treated at 6 dose levels: 22mg/m2 (n = 3); 28mg/m2 (n = 3); 40mg/m2 (n = 3); 55mg/m2 (n = 5); 70mg/m2 (n = 3); 70mg/m2 with capecitabine 1250mg/m2 (n = 6). There were no DLTs observed until the 6th dose level (grade 3 diarrhea). Common adverse events (all grades) included: diarrhea (61%), nausea (57%), fatigue (43%), hand-foot skin reaction (39%), anorexia (39%), vomiting (35%), rash (30%), and darkening vision (22%). Myelosuppression was uncommon, with no instances of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia, and only 2 patients (9%) with grade 3/4 neutropenia (1 patient each). Of the 19 patients evaluable for response per RECIST 1.1, unconfirmed partial response (PR) was noted in 3 patients (13%; colorectal, 1; breast, 1; stomach, 1), with 1 additional confirmed PR (4%; colorectal); two of these had progressed on prior fluorouracil. Stable disease was noted in 8 patients (35%). Conclusions: The addition of AUY922 to standard dose capecitabine was well-tolerated at doses of up to 70mg/m2. Preliminary efficacy is encouraging, and warrants further investigation of this regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT01226732.

scholarly journals Phase I Study of Rivoceranib, a Selective VEGFR-2 Angiogenesis Inhibitor, Administered Daily in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon-Koo Kang ◽  
Min-Hee Ryu ◽  
Yong Sang Hong ◽  
Chang-Min Choi ◽  
Tae Won Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Angiogenesis Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Potential Clinical Benefit ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Rivoceranib is a highly potent and selective inhibitor of VEGFR-2 and subsequent angiogenesis through this receptor signaling pathway. This phase I study was the first global study with rivoceranib outside of China in Korean and Caucasian patients and was designed to determine the safety profile (including maximum tolerated dose), pharmacokinetics, and efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Thirty-one adult patients with advanced malignant solid tumors were enrolled to investigate 6 dose levels of rivoceranib. Twenty-five patients were initially enrolled to 5 dose levels of rivoceranib from 81 to 685 mg and an additional 6 patients were later enrolled in a supplemental study to evaluate the 805 mg dose level. Rivoceranib was very well tolerated. At the 805 mg dose level, 2 dose-limiting toxicities were observed but the 685 mg dose was well tolerated over multiple cycles of therapy. The maximum tolerated dose for rivoceranib was 685 mg (equivalent to 850 mg rivoceranib mesylate) and recommended for further study in patients with advanced solid tumors. The most common adverse events were hypertension (all grades %/≥G3%: 58/29), nausea (42/0), diarrhea (39/0), anorexia (32/3), and fatigue (29/6). Rivoceranib pharmacokinetics were proportional across all dose levels but interpatient variability was high. Of the 31 patients enrolled, 21 were evaluable for efficacy. In this evaluable group, partial response was recorded in 5 patients, stable disease in 10, and disease progression in 6. Results indicate the potential clinical benefit of daily rivoceranib in patients with advanced malignant solid tumors with a tolerable safety profile.Trial registration: NCT01497704 (ClinicalTrials.gov) registered on December 22, 2011 and NCT02711969 (ClinicalTrials.gov) registered on March 17, 2016.

A phase I study of vorinostat (VOR) in combination with capecitabine (CAP) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3576-3576 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Tang ◽  
A. Oza ◽  
C. Townsley ◽  
L. Siu ◽  
G. Pond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Zinc Ion ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types

3576 Background: VOR (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid; SAHA) is a small molecule inhibitor of histone deacetylase (HDAC) that binds directly to the enzyme’s active site in the presence of a zinc ion. Aberrant HDAC activity has been implicated in a variety of cancers. The combination of 5-fluorouracil and VOR is synergistic in preclinical tumor models. Methods: This phase I study evaluated safety, tolerability, and the recommended phase II dose (RPTD) of VOR and CAP in pts with advanced solid tumors. VOR was administered orally daily while CAP was administered orally bid on days 1–14 of a 21 d cycle. Results: Three dose levels have been evaluated (VOR (mg/d)/CAP (mg/bid)): 300/750, 300/1,000 and 400/1,000. Twenty-three pts have been treated: 6M/17F, median age 59 (range 41–73), ECOG 0:1:2 = 9:13:1, prior therapy 1:2:3 or more = 3:7:13. Pts had colorectal cancer (n=6), nasopharyngeal (n=3) and various other tumors. A total of 104 cycles have been administered, with median = 2 (range 1–15). One dose limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade 3 diarrhea) occurred in 6 patients at dose level 1. No DLT were observed at dose level 2, and 2 DLTs (grade 3 fatigue and grade 3 nausea/vomiting) occurred at dose level 3. RPTD was determined to be VOR 300 mg/d and CAP 1,000 mg/bid. Most common toxicities of any grade and at least possibly attributable (n=22) are: thrombocytopenia (59% of pts), fatigue (55%), nausea (55%), vomiting (50%), hypoalbuminemia (45%), anemia (41%), diarrhea (41%), anorexia (41%), elevated creatinine (36%), lymphopenia (36%), hyponatremia (36%), and hyperglycemia (36%). Common grade 3 toxicities included: hand-foot syndrome (23% of pts), diarrhea (14%), fatigue (14%), and lymphopenia (14%). One pt died on study from ventricular fibrillation due to sotalol and hypocalcemia from pre-existing hypoparathyroidism. Five patients with various tumor types had PR (2 confirmed, 3 unconfirmed) (2 nasopharyngeal, 1 each of ovarian, endometrial and squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck). In addition, disease stabilization was seen in 12 patients. Conclusions: VOR and CAP are well tolerated, and this combination is active in several tumor types. Further evaluations of VOR and CAP are warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I study of topotecan and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors: a cancer and leukemia group B study.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 2743-2750 ◽  
Author(s):  
A A Miller ◽  
J B Hargis ◽  
R C Lilenbaum ◽  
S Z Fields ◽  
G L Rosner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

PURPOSE The objectives of this phase I trial were to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan combined with cisplatin, to define the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) of the combination without and with the use of filgrastim, and to define recommended doses for phase II trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced solid tumors were eligible if they had normal bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function and had not previously been treated with platinum compounds. Topotecan was administered intravenously on days 1 through 5 and cisplatin was administered intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The topotecan dose was fixed at 1.0 mg/m2/d on the first four dose levels, and cisplatin was escalated in 25-mg/m2 increments from 25 to 100 mg/m2 without filgrastim. After encountering DLT, the dose of cisplatin was decreased by one level and topotecan dose escalation was attempted. After defining the MTD without growth factor, the study proceeded with escalating cisplatin doses to define the MTD with filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg subcutaneously (SC) daily starting on day 6 of treatment. Priming with filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg SC on days -6 to -2 before the first course was explored last. RESULTS Of 38 patients entered, 37 were eligible, 35 assessable for toxicity in the first course, and 28 assessable for response. The principal toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia, which had to last more than 7 days to be considered dose-limiting. No DLT was observed at the starting cisplatin dose of 25 mg/m2 (dose level 1). On level 2 (cisplatin 50 mg/m2, one patient had dose-limiting neutropenia and one patient had grade 3 renal toxicity. On level 3 (cisplatin 75 mg/m2), two patients had dose-limiting neutropenia. Therefore, cisplatin dose escalation was stopped. On dose level 5 (cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and topotecan 1.25 mg/m2/d), one patient had grade 4 neutropenia that lasted more than 7 days and one patient died of neutropenic sepsis. The remaining dose levels used topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (level 6) and 100 mg/m2 (levels 7 and 8) with filgrastim. No DLT was observed on level 6. On level 7, two patients had dose-limiting neutropenia and one patient had grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia. Priming with filgrastim on level 8 demonstrated no obvious advantage over level 7, and one patient had grade 4 thrombocytopenia that lasted more than 7 days. Three patients with non-small-cell lung cancer achieved a partial response and one patient with breast cancer had a complete response. CONCLUSION Topotecan and cisplatin in combination cause more neutropenia than expected from either drug given alone at the same dosage. The recommended phase II doses are topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d for 5 days in combination with cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 without filgrastim or cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 with filgrastim support.

A phase I study of pegylated doxorubicin (DOX) and weekly topotecan (TOP) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12018-12018
Author(s):  
G. A. Masters ◽  
M. Guarino ◽  
C. Schneider ◽  
D. Biggs ◽  
S. Grubbs
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

12018 Background: The primary endpoint of this prospective phase I study of DOX-TOP in pts with advanced solid tumors was to identify the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of this combination. Other objectives included a description of additional toxicities and efficacy in this patient population with refractory cancers. Pharmacokinetic sampling of TOP plasma levels will be reported separately. Methods: Eligible pts had advanced solid tumors and had either failed standard chemotherapy (chemo) or were pts for whom no standard therapy existed. They had ECOG PS = 0–2, adequate organ function, and gave written, informed consent. Initial doses included DOX 40 mg/m2 day 1 and TOP 2 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and 15 q 28 days. TOP was to be escalated in cohorts of pts. DLT was defined as febrile neutropenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, any grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity, or the inability to receive subsequent treatment due to ongoing toxicity. Treatment was held for ANC < 1000 or platelets < 75,000. Results: Fourteen pts have been enrolled on this phase I study, all of whom were evaluable for toxicity. There were 12 males and 2 females, and the median age was 57 years (range 25–86). Four had ECOG PS = 0, 9 had PS = 1, and 1 had PS = 2. Cancer types included head and neck (3), renal (2), and breast, pancreas, liver, esophagus, germ cell tumor, sarcoma, and others (one each). In the 6 pts treated at dose level 1, toxicities included grade 3 anemia (1) and neutropenia (2), and grade 4 neutropenia (1). DLT consisted of grade 4 thrombocytopenia (1) and inability to deliver day 15 TOP in 3/6 pts at this dose. Thus, TOP was reduced to 1.5 mg/m2 weekly for dose level -1, and 8 pts have been treated. Toxicities included grade 3 anemia (1)and neutropenia (2), and grade 4 neutropenia (1) and thrombocytopenia (1). Enrollment continues at this dose level to confirm tolerability. No patient achieved an objective response to therapy, but 2 pts have stable disease for up to 4 cycles. Conclusions: DOX-TOP can be safely combined in pts with advanced solid tumors, with hematologic toxicity as the DLT. The preliminary recommended phase II dose is DOX 40 mg/m2 and TOP 1.5 mg/m2. We plan to explore an additional dose level of DOX 30 mg/m2 and TOP 2 mg/m2. Phase II evaluation is contemplated in selected tumor types. [Table: see text]

Phase I trial of temsirolimus (TEM), irinotecan (IRN), and temozolomide (TMZ) in children with refractory solid tumors:  A Children's Oncology Group study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9540-9540
Author(s):  
Rochelle Bagatell ◽  
Robin Elizabeth Norris ◽  
Ashish M Ingle ◽  
Charlotte H Ahern ◽  
Jennifer Saggio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Mtor Inhibitor ◽  
Systemic Steroid ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Elevated Transaminases ◽  
Dose Levels

9540 Background: Inhibitors of mTOR have demonstrated activity in preclinical pediatric solid tumor models. A phase I trial to define the dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) associated with the mTOR inhibitor TEM in combination with IRN and TMZ was conducted in patients (pts) with refractory solid tumors. Methods: Escalating doses of TEM were administered intravenously on days (d) 1 and 8 of a 21-d cycle for a maximum of 1 year (y). IRN (50 mg/m2/dose) was administered orally on d1-5. TMZ (100 mg/m2/dose) was administered orally on d1-5. When the maximum planned dose of TEM was reached (35 mg/m2/dose), IRN was escalated stepwise from 50 to 90 mg/m2/dose. Pts were enrolled on 6 dose levels using the rolling-six design. Results: 46 eligible pts (30 male, median age 11y, range 1 – 21) were enrolled; 37 were fully evaluable for toxicity [neuroblastoma (9), osteosarcoma (4), Ewing sarcoma (3), rhabdomyosarcoma (3), CNS (10) or other (8) tumors]. 173 cycles, median 2 (range 1 – 17) have been delivered. Dose-limiting hyperlipidemia was observed during cycle 1 in 2 pts at dose level 3 (TEM 25 mg/m2, IRN 50 mg/m2, TMZ 100 mg/m2); both pts were on chronic corticosteroids. The protocol was amended to preclude chronic systemic steroid use and modify hyperlipidemia management. Dose-limiting hyperlipidemia was not observed in subsequent pts. Cycle 1 DLT (elevated GGT) was observed in 1 pt treated with TEM 35 mg/m2, IRN 65 mg/m2, TMZ 100 mg/m2. DLT has not been observed in 4 of the first 6 pts treated at the highest planned dose level (TEM 35 mg/m2, IRN 90 mg/m2, TMZ 100 mg/m2). Additional ≥Grade 3 regimen-related toxicities occurring in >1 evaluable pt include neutropenia (12), lymphopenia (10), leukopenia (6), thrombocytopenia (4), anemia (2), nausea or vomiting (5), hypokalemia (4), hypophosphatemia (2), diarrhea (2), elevated transaminases (2), and infection (2). 1 pt had a Grade 3 allergic reaction to TEM. 1 pt had a confirmed partial response and 4 have remained on protocol therapy for ≥1 year. Conclusions: The combination of TEM (35 mg/m2/dose) d 1 and 8, IRN (90 mg/m2/dose) d 1-5, and TMZ (100 mg/m2/dose) d 1-5 of a 21-d cycle appears to be well tolerated in children with refractory solid tumors.

A phase I dose escalation trial of ispinesib (SB-715992) administered days 1–3 of a 21-day cycle in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2026-2026 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. I. Heath ◽  
A. Alousi ◽  
J. P. Eder ◽  
M. Valdivieso ◽  
L. S. Vasist ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Data ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

2026 Background: Ispinesib, a novel cytotoxic agent inhibiting the kinesin spindle protein (KSP) has demonstrated significant antitumor activity in multiple murine tumor models. The primary objectives of the study were to assess the safety and tolerability of SB-715992, to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Methods: Ispinesib was administered days 1–3 intravenously over 1 hour every 21 days, starting at a dose of 1 mg/m2/day. Traditional 3-patient cohort trial design was utilized with dose levels of 2, 4, 6, 8 mg/m2/day. Results: Twenty-seven patients (24 Caucasians, 3 African-Americans, 16 males, 11 females) with various tumor types were enrolled; colorectal (7), renal (5), bladder (2), lung (2), pharynx (2), pancreas (2), others (7). Grade 3/4 toxicities were noted starting at the 4 mg/m2 dose level with two patients developing grade 4 neutropenia; one for < 5 days, one for > 5 days (with grade 3 leukopenia). At the 6 mg/m2 dose level, grade 3 neutropenia and leukopenia were reported. At the 8 mg/m2 dose level, 3 of 3 patients had grade 4 neutropenia and leukopenia. The 6 mg/m2 dose level was declared the MTD. Toxicities seen in the additional 6 patients included grade 1 fatigue (1/6), grade 1 infusion- related flushing (1/6), grade 3 febrile neutropenia (1/6), and grade 4 neutropenia and leukopenia (1/6). The MTD cohort has been expanded to 10 evaluable patients for confirmation of tolerability and pharmacodynamic endpoints including phosphohistone 3 (PH3), cyclin E, and TUNEL assay on serial tumor biopsies. Preliminary pharmacokinetic data appear linear, but not dose proportional. As predicted, between days 1 and 3, accumulation ranged from 40 to 106%. Exposures appear comparable between cycles 1 and 2. Stable disease in 2 patients with renal cell carcinoma (4 and 5 cycles) and minor response in one patient with bladder cancer were seen. Conclusions: Treatment with ispinesib at the MTD of 6 mg/m2/day x 3 days in patients with advanced solid tumors was well tolerated with consistent dose limiting toxicity of myelosuppression. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I, safety, pharmacokinetic and biomarker study of BAY 57–9352, an oral VEGFR-2 inhibitor, in a continuous schedule in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3040-3040
Author(s):  
H. Gelderblom ◽  
J. Verweij ◽  
N. Steeghs ◽  
A. Van Erkel ◽  
L. Van Doorn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Competitive Inhibitor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Tumor Patient ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Ca Antagonist ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

3040 Background: BAY 57–9352 is a potent competitive inhibitor of the VEGFR-2 (IC50: 6 nM), VEGFR-3 (IC50: 4 nM), PDGFR-β and c-KIT tyrosine kinases. BAY 57–9352 showed tumor efficacy in colon, breast, pancreatic and NSCLC models. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors received oral BAY 57–9352 on a continuous basis, in escalating doses. One cycle was defined as 21 days of treatment. Extensive PK and PD (dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI [DCE-MRI]) evaluations were performed. Plasma biomarkers (e.g. VEGF)were also evaluated. Results: Forty patients (median 54 yrs) were enrolled at seven dose levels from 20 mg solution once daily to1500 mg twice daily (bid; 150 mg tablets) for a total of 169 cycles (range 1–17). The most frequent drug-related adverse events were nausea, hypertension, headache, vomiting, hoarseness, rash, dry skin and anorexia. One patient treated at 600 mg bid had a dose-limiting toxicity defined by an increase from grade 2 to 3 hypertension, despite the addition of an ACE-inhibitor and Ca-antagonist on day 8 of cycle 2. Another patient at that same dose level and also on day 8 cycle 2, had grade 3 AST/ALT increase, however this was not assessed as dose-limiting. Both patients continued treatment after dose reductions. Treatment was well tolerated, even at the highest dose levels. One patient with a hemangio-endothelioma (600 mg bid) had a clinical response and one desmoid tumor patient (900 mg bid) had a 53% reduction in tumor volume. BAY 57–9352 AUC increased dose proportionally up to 900 mg bid. The target AUC, based on animal models (5 mg × h/L) was reached in all patients at 900 mg bid. Dose levels exceeding 900 mg bid had similar plasma VEGF biomarker levels. Conclusions: BAY 57–9352 was well tolerated in doses up to 1500 mg bid. Based on safety, PK, PD and biomarker assessments, the recommended dose level is 900 mg bid. A 300 mg tablet is being tested for patient convenience. Combination chemotherapy studies have been started. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document