Phase I, safety, pharmacokinetic and biomarker study of BAY 57–9352, an oral VEGFR-2 inhibitor, in a continuous schedule in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3040-3040
Author(s):  
H. Gelderblom ◽  
J. Verweij ◽  
N. Steeghs ◽  
A. Van Erkel ◽  
L. Van Doorn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Competitive Inhibitor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Tumor Patient ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Ca Antagonist ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

3040 Background: BAY 57–9352 is a potent competitive inhibitor of the VEGFR-2 (IC50: 6 nM), VEGFR-3 (IC50: 4 nM), PDGFR-β and c-KIT tyrosine kinases. BAY 57–9352 showed tumor efficacy in colon, breast, pancreatic and NSCLC models. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors received oral BAY 57–9352 on a continuous basis, in escalating doses. One cycle was defined as 21 days of treatment. Extensive PK and PD (dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI [DCE-MRI]) evaluations were performed. Plasma biomarkers (e.g. VEGF)were also evaluated. Results: Forty patients (median 54 yrs) were enrolled at seven dose levels from 20 mg solution once daily to1500 mg twice daily (bid; 150 mg tablets) for a total of 169 cycles (range 1–17). The most frequent drug-related adverse events were nausea, hypertension, headache, vomiting, hoarseness, rash, dry skin and anorexia. One patient treated at 600 mg bid had a dose-limiting toxicity defined by an increase from grade 2 to 3 hypertension, despite the addition of an ACE-inhibitor and Ca-antagonist on day 8 of cycle 2. Another patient at that same dose level and also on day 8 cycle 2, had grade 3 AST/ALT increase, however this was not assessed as dose-limiting. Both patients continued treatment after dose reductions. Treatment was well tolerated, even at the highest dose levels. One patient with a hemangio-endothelioma (600 mg bid) had a clinical response and one desmoid tumor patient (900 mg bid) had a 53% reduction in tumor volume. BAY 57–9352 AUC increased dose proportionally up to 900 mg bid. The target AUC, based on animal models (5 mg × h/L) was reached in all patients at 900 mg bid. Dose levels exceeding 900 mg bid had similar plasma VEGF biomarker levels. Conclusions: BAY 57–9352 was well tolerated in doses up to 1500 mg bid. Based on safety, PK, PD and biomarker assessments, the recommended dose level is 900 mg bid. A 300 mg tablet is being tested for patient convenience. Combination chemotherapy studies have been started. [Table: see text]

Phase I study of the HSP90 inhibitor AUY922 in combination with capecitabine as treatment for patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 475-475
Author(s):  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Lowell L. Hart ◽  
Shubham Pant ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Suzanne Fields Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Heat Shock Protein 90 ◽  
Competitive Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Grade 3

475 Background: Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) is a molecular chaperone involved in the maintenance and function of client proteins, many of which are integral to key oncogenic processes. AUY922 is a competitive inhibitor of HSP90, with demonstrated activity in a variety of preclinical models. Further preclinical evidence suggests potential synergy between inhibition of HSP90 and fluorouracil treatment (Burkitt et al. 2007). This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AUY922 in combination with standard dose of capecitabine as treatment for patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Patients with refractory solid tumors for which capecitabine was an appropriate therapy received AUY922 with capecitabine in a standard 3+3 dose escalation. Capecitabine 1000mg/m2 was administered twice daily for days 1-14 of 21-day cycles, with escalating doses of AUY922 administered by intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1, 8, and 15; the 6th dose level combined the MTD of AUY922 with capecitabine 1250mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), safety, and efficacy were evaluated. Results: 23 patients were treated at 6 dose levels: 22mg/m2 (n = 3); 28mg/m2 (n = 3); 40mg/m2 (n = 3); 55mg/m2 (n = 5); 70mg/m2 (n = 3); 70mg/m2 with capecitabine 1250mg/m2 (n = 6). There were no DLTs observed until the 6th dose level (grade 3 diarrhea). Common adverse events (all grades) included: diarrhea (61%), nausea (57%), fatigue (43%), hand-foot skin reaction (39%), anorexia (39%), vomiting (35%), rash (30%), and darkening vision (22%). Myelosuppression was uncommon, with no instances of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia, and only 2 patients (9%) with grade 3/4 neutropenia (1 patient each). Of the 19 patients evaluable for response per RECIST 1.1, unconfirmed partial response (PR) was noted in 3 patients (13%; colorectal, 1; breast, 1; stomach, 1), with 1 additional confirmed PR (4%; colorectal); two of these had progressed on prior fluorouracil. Stable disease was noted in 8 patients (35%). Conclusions: The addition of AUY922 to standard dose capecitabine was well-tolerated at doses of up to 70mg/m2. Preliminary efficacy is encouraging, and warrants further investigation of this regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT01226732.

Phase I study of sirolimus plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors: A Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas (GEIS) study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3096-3096
Author(s):  
Juan Martin Liberal ◽  
Marta Gil ◽  
Laura Jimenez ◽  
Maria Ochoa de Olza ◽  
Carmen Munoz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Mtor Pathway ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Skin Biopsies ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

3096 Background: In preclinical studies, combination of sirolimus with gemcitabine enhances apoptosis in vitro and increases anti-tumor efficacy in vivo. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors, age 18-70 years, no prior mTOR inhibitor or gemcitabine, ECOG PS 0-1, and adequate hematological, renal and hepatic function, were enrolled in this phase I study to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and to identify the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of the combination of sirolimus and gemcitabine. A 3+3 dose escalation design with cohorts of 3-6 patients was used. Sirolimus was given po continuously. Gemcitabine was given iv 10mg/m2/minute on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Dose levels 1, 2 and 3 corresponded to sirolimus 2, 2 and 5mg/24h plus gemcitabine 800, 1000 and 1000mg/m2 respectively. After observing DLTs at higher dose level and poorer mTOR signaling inhibition at lower doses, a new cohort of sirolimus 5mg/24h plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 was added. Skin biopsies pre and post treatment were performed to assess the inhibition of mTOR pathway. Results: 19 patients were enrolled: median age 51 years (36-70); gender 12M, 7F. Median number of cycles was 4. Patients were treated at 4 dose levels, the MTD was reached at level 3 and the RD was: sirolimus 5mg/24h and gemcitabine 800mg/m2. 3 DLTs were observed, 1 at dose level 2 and 2 at dose level 3: transaminitis grade 3, thrombocytopenia grade 3 and thrombocytopenia grade 4. Other toxicities grade 1-2 included anemia, neutropenia, asthenia, mucositis and high cholesterol levels. 2 patients achieved partial response (1 uterine cervix cancer and 1 colon cancer). Immunohistochemistry of pS6 in skin biopsies showed significative inhibition of mTOR pathway at RD. PK parameters estimated were in agreement with those previously reported in the literature. No influence of sirolimus administration on gemcitabine clearance was found. Conclusions: Combination of sirolimus and gemcitabine is feasible and safe, allowing administration of active doses of both agents and achieving mTOR signaling inhibition. A phase II study to assess the activity of this combination in sarcomas is ongoing.

Phase I study of the HSP90 inhibitor AUY922 in combination with capecitabine as treatment for patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3564-3564
Author(s):  
Shubham Pant ◽  
Lowell L. Hart ◽  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Suzanne Fields Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Hsp90 Inhibition ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

3564 Background: Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) is a molecular chaperone involved in the maintenance and function of client proteins, many of which are integral to key oncogenic processes. AUY922 is a competitive inhibitor of HSP90. Preclinical evidence suggests potential synergy between HSP90 inhibition and fluorouracil. This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AUY922 in combination with standard dose of capecitabine as treatment for patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Pts with refractory solid tumors received AUY922 with capecitabine in a standard 3+3 dose escalation. Dose levels were capecitabine 1000mg/m2 PO BID d 1-14 of 21-day cycles, with escalating doses of AUY922 IV days 1, 8, and 15; the 6th dose level combined the MTD of AUY922 with capecitabine 1250mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), safety, and efficacy were evaluated. Results: 23 pts were treated at 6 dose levels: 22mg/m2 (n = 3); 28mg/m2 (n = 3); 40mg/m2 (n = 3); 55mg/m2 (n = 5); 70mg/m2 (n = 3); 70mg/m2 with capecitabine 1250mg/m2 (n= 6). No DLTs were observed until the 6th dose level (grade 3 diarrhea). Related adverse events (% grade 1/2; % grade 3/4) included: diarrhea (43%; 17%), fatigue (30%; 13%), nausea (39%; 0), hand-foot skin reaction (30%; 5%), anorexia (30%; 4%), vomiting (30%; 0), and darkening vision (26%; 0). Vision darkening, a class effect of HSP90 inhibitors, was reversible with drug hold and retreatment was possible. Two pts (9%) had hematologic G 3/4 events of neutropenia. Of the 19 pts evaluable for response, partial response was noted in 4 patients (colorectal, 2; breast, 1; stomach, 1); 2 had progressed on prior fluorouracil, and remained on treatment for 13-35 wks. Stable disease was noted in 8 pts (35% [colorectal, 5; pancreas, 2; breast, 1]) with a median duration of 25.5 wks (range: 11-44+). All 5 colorectal pts were refractory to 5-FU. Conclusions: The addition of AUY922 to standard dose capecitabine was well-tolerated at doses of up to 70mg/m2. Preliminary efficacy is encouraging, particularly as seen in pts previously resistant to fluorouracil, and warrants further investigation of this regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT01226732.

Phase I study of topotecan and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors: a cancer and leukemia group B study.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 2743-2750 ◽  
Author(s):  
A A Miller ◽  
J B Hargis ◽  
R C Lilenbaum ◽  
S Z Fields ◽  
G L Rosner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

PURPOSE The objectives of this phase I trial were to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan combined with cisplatin, to define the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) of the combination without and with the use of filgrastim, and to define recommended doses for phase II trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced solid tumors were eligible if they had normal bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function and had not previously been treated with platinum compounds. Topotecan was administered intravenously on days 1 through 5 and cisplatin was administered intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The topotecan dose was fixed at 1.0 mg/m2/d on the first four dose levels, and cisplatin was escalated in 25-mg/m2 increments from 25 to 100 mg/m2 without filgrastim. After encountering DLT, the dose of cisplatin was decreased by one level and topotecan dose escalation was attempted. After defining the MTD without growth factor, the study proceeded with escalating cisplatin doses to define the MTD with filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg subcutaneously (SC) daily starting on day 6 of treatment. Priming with filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg SC on days -6 to -2 before the first course was explored last. RESULTS Of 38 patients entered, 37 were eligible, 35 assessable for toxicity in the first course, and 28 assessable for response. The principal toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia, which had to last more than 7 days to be considered dose-limiting. No DLT was observed at the starting cisplatin dose of 25 mg/m2 (dose level 1). On level 2 (cisplatin 50 mg/m2, one patient had dose-limiting neutropenia and one patient had grade 3 renal toxicity. On level 3 (cisplatin 75 mg/m2), two patients had dose-limiting neutropenia. Therefore, cisplatin dose escalation was stopped. On dose level 5 (cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and topotecan 1.25 mg/m2/d), one patient had grade 4 neutropenia that lasted more than 7 days and one patient died of neutropenic sepsis. The remaining dose levels used topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (level 6) and 100 mg/m2 (levels 7 and 8) with filgrastim. No DLT was observed on level 6. On level 7, two patients had dose-limiting neutropenia and one patient had grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia. Priming with filgrastim on level 8 demonstrated no obvious advantage over level 7, and one patient had grade 4 thrombocytopenia that lasted more than 7 days. Three patients with non-small-cell lung cancer achieved a partial response and one patient with breast cancer had a complete response. CONCLUSION Topotecan and cisplatin in combination cause more neutropenia than expected from either drug given alone at the same dosage. The recommended phase II doses are topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d for 5 days in combination with cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 without filgrastim or cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 with filgrastim support.

A phase I dose escalation trial of ispinesib (SB-715992) administered days 1–3 of a 21-day cycle in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2026-2026 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. I. Heath ◽  
A. Alousi ◽  
J. P. Eder ◽  
M. Valdivieso ◽  
L. S. Vasist ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Data ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

2026 Background: Ispinesib, a novel cytotoxic agent inhibiting the kinesin spindle protein (KSP) has demonstrated significant antitumor activity in multiple murine tumor models. The primary objectives of the study were to assess the safety and tolerability of SB-715992, to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Methods: Ispinesib was administered days 1–3 intravenously over 1 hour every 21 days, starting at a dose of 1 mg/m2/day. Traditional 3-patient cohort trial design was utilized with dose levels of 2, 4, 6, 8 mg/m2/day. Results: Twenty-seven patients (24 Caucasians, 3 African-Americans, 16 males, 11 females) with various tumor types were enrolled; colorectal (7), renal (5), bladder (2), lung (2), pharynx (2), pancreas (2), others (7). Grade 3/4 toxicities were noted starting at the 4 mg/m2 dose level with two patients developing grade 4 neutropenia; one for < 5 days, one for > 5 days (with grade 3 leukopenia). At the 6 mg/m2 dose level, grade 3 neutropenia and leukopenia were reported. At the 8 mg/m2 dose level, 3 of 3 patients had grade 4 neutropenia and leukopenia. The 6 mg/m2 dose level was declared the MTD. Toxicities seen in the additional 6 patients included grade 1 fatigue (1/6), grade 1 infusion- related flushing (1/6), grade 3 febrile neutropenia (1/6), and grade 4 neutropenia and leukopenia (1/6). The MTD cohort has been expanded to 10 evaluable patients for confirmation of tolerability and pharmacodynamic endpoints including phosphohistone 3 (PH3), cyclin E, and TUNEL assay on serial tumor biopsies. Preliminary pharmacokinetic data appear linear, but not dose proportional. As predicted, between days 1 and 3, accumulation ranged from 40 to 106%. Exposures appear comparable between cycles 1 and 2. Stable disease in 2 patients with renal cell carcinoma (4 and 5 cycles) and minor response in one patient with bladder cancer were seen. Conclusions: Treatment with ispinesib at the MTD of 6 mg/m2/day x 3 days in patients with advanced solid tumors was well tolerated with consistent dose limiting toxicity of myelosuppression. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Phase I Study of Rivoceranib, a Selective VEGFR-2 Angiogenesis Inhibitor, Administered Daily in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon-Koo Kang ◽  
Min-Hee Ryu ◽  
Yong Sang Hong ◽  
Chang-Min Choi ◽  
Tae Won Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Angiogenesis Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Potential Clinical Benefit ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Rivoceranib is a highly potent and selective inhibitor of VEGFR-2 and subsequent angiogenesis through this receptor signaling pathway. This phase I study was the first global study with rivoceranib outside of China in Korean and Caucasian patients and was designed to determine the safety profile (including maximum tolerated dose), pharmacokinetics, and efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Thirty-one adult patients with advanced malignant solid tumors were enrolled to investigate 6 dose levels of rivoceranib. Twenty-five patients were initially enrolled to 5 dose levels of rivoceranib from 81 to 685 mg and an additional 6 patients were later enrolled in a supplemental study to evaluate the 805 mg dose level. Rivoceranib was very well tolerated. At the 805 mg dose level, 2 dose-limiting toxicities were observed but the 685 mg dose was well tolerated over multiple cycles of therapy. The maximum tolerated dose for rivoceranib was 685 mg (equivalent to 850 mg rivoceranib mesylate) and recommended for further study in patients with advanced solid tumors. The most common adverse events were hypertension (all grades %/≥G3%: 58/29), nausea (42/0), diarrhea (39/0), anorexia (32/3), and fatigue (29/6). Rivoceranib pharmacokinetics were proportional across all dose levels but interpatient variability was high. Of the 31 patients enrolled, 21 were evaluable for efficacy. In this evaluable group, partial response was recorded in 5 patients, stable disease in 10, and disease progression in 6. Results indicate the potential clinical benefit of daily rivoceranib in patients with advanced malignant solid tumors with a tolerable safety profile.Trial registration: NCT01497704 (ClinicalTrials.gov) registered on December 22, 2011 and NCT02711969 (ClinicalTrials.gov) registered on March 17, 2016.

Phase I trial of combination becatecarin and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2561-2561
Author(s):  
S. Manda ◽  
C. Mauser ◽  
J. Bokar ◽  
M. Cooney ◽  
J. Brell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Level 2

2561 Background: Becatecarin (rebeccamycin analogue-RA) is an anti-tumor antibiotic with inhibitory activity against both topoisomerase II and I as well as DNA intercalating properties. We performed a phase I trial to a) determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of RA in combination with oxaliplatin; b) determine the dose limiting toxicities (DLT) (c) obtain data on pharmacokinetics and (d) observe for any antitumor activity. Methods: Eligibility criteria included patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy; performance status 0–2; adequate hematologic, renal and liver function. Patients were treated with RA as a 1 hour infusion daily x 5 and oxaliplatin on day 5 only, after RA infusion. Treatment was repeated q 21 days. The following dose levels were evaluated: Dose level 1: RA 80 mg/m2/d and oxaliplatin 90 mg/m2; Dose level 2: RA 80 mg/m2/d and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2; Dose level 3: RA 110 mg/m2/d and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2. Results: A total of 15 evaluable patients were enrolled. Median age was 56 (8 male, 7 female). A variety of tumor types were enrolled. A total of 56 cycles were administered. DLT occurred at a dose of RA at 110 mg/m2/d x 5 days and oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2 and consisted of grade 3 hypophosphatemia and grade 4 atrial fibrillation. At this dose level 2 of 3 enrolled patients also developed grade 3 neutropenia. The MTD and recommended phase II dose was RA at 80 mg/m2/daily x 5 along with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 day 5 q 21 days. Three confirmed partial responses were observed in patients with hepatocellular, gallbladder and esophageal cancers. Six patients experienced stable disease. Conclusions: At the MTD combination RA and oxaliplatin is well tolerated and given the response rate and stable diseases observed, phase II studies are recommended. Supported by Grants U01 CA62502, MO1-RR-00080, K23 CA109348–01 from the National Institutes of Health. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I study of vorinostat (VOR) in combination with capecitabine (CAP) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3576-3576 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Tang ◽  
A. Oza ◽  
C. Townsley ◽  
L. Siu ◽  
G. Pond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Zinc Ion ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types

3576 Background: VOR (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid; SAHA) is a small molecule inhibitor of histone deacetylase (HDAC) that binds directly to the enzyme’s active site in the presence of a zinc ion. Aberrant HDAC activity has been implicated in a variety of cancers. The combination of 5-fluorouracil and VOR is synergistic in preclinical tumor models. Methods: This phase I study evaluated safety, tolerability, and the recommended phase II dose (RPTD) of VOR and CAP in pts with advanced solid tumors. VOR was administered orally daily while CAP was administered orally bid on days 1–14 of a 21 d cycle. Results: Three dose levels have been evaluated (VOR (mg/d)/CAP (mg/bid)): 300/750, 300/1,000 and 400/1,000. Twenty-three pts have been treated: 6M/17F, median age 59 (range 41–73), ECOG 0:1:2 = 9:13:1, prior therapy 1:2:3 or more = 3:7:13. Pts had colorectal cancer (n=6), nasopharyngeal (n=3) and various other tumors. A total of 104 cycles have been administered, with median = 2 (range 1–15). One dose limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade 3 diarrhea) occurred in 6 patients at dose level 1. No DLT were observed at dose level 2, and 2 DLTs (grade 3 fatigue and grade 3 nausea/vomiting) occurred at dose level 3. RPTD was determined to be VOR 300 mg/d and CAP 1,000 mg/bid. Most common toxicities of any grade and at least possibly attributable (n=22) are: thrombocytopenia (59% of pts), fatigue (55%), nausea (55%), vomiting (50%), hypoalbuminemia (45%), anemia (41%), diarrhea (41%), anorexia (41%), elevated creatinine (36%), lymphopenia (36%), hyponatremia (36%), and hyperglycemia (36%). Common grade 3 toxicities included: hand-foot syndrome (23% of pts), diarrhea (14%), fatigue (14%), and lymphopenia (14%). One pt died on study from ventricular fibrillation due to sotalol and hypocalcemia from pre-existing hypoparathyroidism. Five patients with various tumor types had PR (2 confirmed, 3 unconfirmed) (2 nasopharyngeal, 1 each of ovarian, endometrial and squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck). In addition, disease stabilization was seen in 12 patients. Conclusions: VOR and CAP are well tolerated, and this combination is active in several tumor types. Further evaluations of VOR and CAP are warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I dose-escalating study of PM02734 in a 24-hour infusion schedule every 21 days in advanced solid tumors

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2511-2511
Author(s):  
T. R. Evans ◽  
A. Oaknin ◽  
R. J. Jones ◽  
A. Vandermeeren ◽  
C. Coronado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Flat Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Dose Escalating

2511 Background: PM02734 is a chemically synthesized depsipeptide with a broad spectrum of activity against solid tumors in vitro (breast, colon, lung, neuroblastoma, prostate, sarcoma and thyroid) and in vivo (breast, prostate, melanoma); as well as an acceptable non-clinical toxicology profile. Methods: Patients (pts) with metastatic or advanced solid tumors were enrolled in a phase I, open-label, dose-escalating study to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and to identify the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended dose (RD) of PM02734 infused over 24 hours every 21 days (d). The starting dose was 0.48 mg/m2. Cohorts of 1–6 pts were treated at different dose levels. Results: Thirty seven pts were treated in this study. The median age was 55 years (40–75), sex: males/females 20/19. The median PS was 1 (range 0–2). The most frequent cancer types were colon/ gastric/ sarcoma (n=8/5/5). Most patients were heavily pretreated, with a median of prior therapy lines of 4 (1–12). Patients were treated at 8 dose levels (0.48, 0.72, 1.0, 1.6, 2.4, 3.6, 5.4, and 6.8 mg/m2), the MTD was 6.8 mg/m2 and the RD was 5.4 mg/m2 (10 mg flat dose).Common toxicities grade ≤ 2 included asthenia, nausea/emesis, lymphopenia, injection site reactions and asymptomatic elevated transaminases (TAs). DLT were grade 3 asymptomatic, reversible TA elevations at 6.8 mg/m2. Preliminary PK data is characterized by long half life (>100 h), a wide distribution and high inter-patient variability. Clearance was not correlated with dose or body surface area (BSA), therefore, flat dose was implemented and the RD was explored with this schedule. Efficacy data showed one complete response (CR) of +28 months observed in a pt with metastatic large cell esophageal carcinoma, and five more showed stable disease (SD) for more than 3 months in different histologies. Conclusions: PM02734 shows to be safe, well tolerated and with evidence of activity (1 CR and 5 SD > 3 months) in pts with advanced solid tumors. The DLT was grade 3 asymptomatic and reversible TA elevations, and the RD for further phase II studies is 10 mg. [Table: see text]

A phase I study of safety and pharmacokinetics of NanoBB-1-Dox in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13537-e13537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Filon ◽  
Petr Krivorotko ◽  
Grigory Kobyakov ◽  
Viktoria Razjivina ◽  
Olga Maximenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Dependence ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Drug Candidate ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Novel Drug ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
The Brain

e13537 Background: NanoBB-1-Dox is a novel drug candidate for systemic chemotherapy of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). It is a nanoparticle-based formulation of doxorubicin, which enables passage of the drug across the blood-brain barrier and delivery to the tumor inside the brain. Preclinical studies demonstrated that NanoBB-1-Dox enabled considerable growth inhibition of an intracranially implanted 101.8 glioblastoma in rats and long-term remission in >20% animals, whereas the conventional doxorubicin formulation was only marginally effective. Methods: 21 patients with advanced solid tumors (18 with advanced breast cancer, 34 with GBM) were enrolled in the study. The objectives of the study were: 1) to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK), 2) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). A standard “3 + 3” design with 7 dose levels (4, 24, 36, 48, 60, 75 and 90 mg/m2) was used. Each patient received a single i.v. infusion of NanoBB-1-Dox. Doxorubicin serum concentrations were measured immediately before the infusion, and 2 min, 10 min, 20 min, 40 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 168 h after the infusion. Results: The PK analysis demonstrated that AUC0-t of doxorubicin after the NanoBB-1-Dox infusion increased in parallel with the dose level from 121.7 to 2054.4 h x ng/ml. T1/2 varied from 45 to 75 h without dose dependence. NanoBB-1-Dox was well tolerated without dose limiting toxicity even at the highest dose of 90 mg/m2, so the MTD was not achieved. The most common AEs included leukopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, nausea, and alopecia. In general, the AE rate and intensity increased with the dose level reaching the maximum at a dose of 90 mg/m2. Only hematological AEs were severe according to CTCAE 4.03. No SAEs were reported. Conclusions: NanoBB-1-Dox after a single i.v. infusion in patients with advanced solid tumors is well tolerated and is characterized by a non-linear PK profile. NanoBB-1-Dox will be investigated in a phase II study in patients with GBM as a second line therapy. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document