scholarly journals Use of β-Blockers, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers, and Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrence: A Danish Nationwide Prospective Cohort Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (18) ◽  
pp. 2265-2272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gitte Vrelits Sørensen ◽  
Patricia A. Ganz ◽  
Steven W. Cole ◽  
Lars A. Pedersen ◽  
Henrik Toft Sørensen ◽  
...  

Purpose To estimate associations between use of β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and breast cancer recurrence in a large Danish cohort. Patients and Methods We enrolled 18,733 women diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer between 1996 and 2003. Patient, treatment, and 10-year recurrence data were ascertained from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group registry. Prescription and medical histories were ascertained by linkage to the National Prescription Registry and Registry of Patients, respectively. β-Blocker exposure was defined in aggregate and according to solubility, receptor selectivity, and individual drugs. ACE inhibitor and ARB exposures were defined in aggregate. Recurrence associations were estimated with multivariable Cox regression models in which time-varying drug exposures were lagged by 1 year. Results Compared with never users, users of any β-blocker had a lower recurrence hazard in unadjusted models (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.0) and a slightly higher recurrence hazard in adjusted models (adjusted HR = 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.5). Associations were similar for exposures defined by receptor selectivity and solubility. Although most individual β-blockers showed no association with recurrence, metoprolol and sotalol were associated with increased recurrence rates (adjusted metoprolol HR = 1.5, 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.8; adjusted sotalol HR = 2.0, 95% CI, 0.99 to 4.0). ACE inhibitors were associated with a slightly increased recurrence hazard, whereas ARBs were not associated with recurrence (adjusted ACE inhibitor HR = 1.2, 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.4; adjusted ARBs HR = 1.1, 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.3). Conclusion Our data do not support the hypothesis that β-blockers attenuate breast cancer recurrence risk.

2000 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 526-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly K Warner ◽  
James A Visconti ◽  
Marva M Tschampel

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety of using angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients who have experienced angioedema following treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. DATA SOURCES: Clinical literature identified through MEDLINE (January 1966–August 1999). Key search terms included angioneurotic edema, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, receptors–angiotensin, and losartan. DATA SYNTHESIS: ACE inhibitor–induced angioedema occurs with an incidence of 0.1–0.5%. Alternative therapy is necessary for patients who experience this potentially life-threatening adverse effect. Since angiotensin II receptor blockers do not increase concentrations of bradykinin, the proposed mechanism of ACE inhibitor–induced angioedema, they were presumed to be safe alternatives. Recent case reports, however, document angioedema following therapy with angiotensin II receptor blockers; 32% of the reported patients experienced a prior episode of angioedema attributed to ACE inhibitor therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Until the exact cause of both ACE inhibitor– and angiotensin II receptor blocker–induced angioedema is determined, angiotensin II receptor blockers should be used with extreme caution in patients with a prior history of angioedema.


1998 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 1060-1066 ◽  
Author(s):  
George B Pylypchuk

OBJECTIVE: To compare the tolerability of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors with that of angiotensin II (AII)-receptor blockers and the incidence of cough and angioedema associated with their use through review of published data. DATA SOURCES: References were identified through a MEDLINE search of articles published between January 1975 and April 1997. Bibliographies of pertinent references were also reviewed. RESULTS: Results of placebo-controlled and comparative trials of the AII blockers demonstrate that they are at least as effective as ACE inhibitors for hypertension, but exhibit an incidence of cough and absent or rare angioedema like that of placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In the 10 comparative trials described, all reported a lower incidence of cough with AII blockers than with ACE inhibitors. Angioedema was not reported in the comparative trials described.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 870-877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edith Pituskin ◽  
John R. Mackey ◽  
Sheri Koshman ◽  
Davinder Jassal ◽  
Marshall Pitz ◽  
...  

Purpose The primary toxicity of trastuzumab therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–overexpressing (HER2-positive) breast cancer is dose-independent cardiac dysfunction. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and β-blockers are recommended first-line agents for heart failure. We hypothesized that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and β-blockers could prevent trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity. Patients and Methods In this double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive treatment with perindopril, bisoprolol, or placebo (1:1:1) for the duration of trastuzumab adjuvant therapy. Patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at baseline and post–cycle 17 for the determination of left ventricular volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Cardiotoxicity was evaluated as the change in indexed left ventricular end diastolic volume and LVEF. Results Thirty-three patients received perindopril, 31 received bisoprolol, and 30 received placebo. Baseline demographic, cancer, and cardiovascular profiles were similar between groups. Study drugs were well tolerated with no serious adverse events. After 17 cycles of trastuzumab, indexed left ventricular end diastolic volume increased in patients treated with perindopril (+7 ± 14 mL/m2), bisoprolol (+8 mL ± 9 mL/m2), and placebo (+4 ± 11 mL/m2; P = .36). In secondary analyses, trastuzumab-mediated decline in LVEF was attenuated in bisoprolol-treated patients (−1 ± 5%) relative to the perindopril (−3 ± 4%) and placebo (−5 ± 5%) groups ( P = .001). Perindopril and bisoprolol use were independent predictors of maintained LVEF on multivariable analysis. Conclusion Perindopril and bisoprolol were well tolerated in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer who received trastuzumab and protected against cancer therapy–related declines in LVEF; however, trastuzumab-mediated left ventricular remodeling—the primary outcome—was not prevented by these pharmacotherapies.


2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 426-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Kurtis Childers ◽  
Christopher S. Hollenbeak ◽  
Pramil Cheriyath

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document