A multicenter phase II study of sorafenib, capecitabine, and oxaliplatin (SECOX) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Final results of Hong Kong-Singapore Hepatocellular Carcinoma Research Collaborative Group study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4117-4117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Cheung Yau ◽  
Foon Yiu Cheung ◽  
Francis Lee ◽  
Su Pin Choo ◽  
Hilda Wong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Asian Population ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Collaborative Group ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Grade One

4117 Background: This is a single arm, multi-center, phase II study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of sorafenib, oxaliplatin and capecitabine combination for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Methods: Eligible patients received SECOX regime—sorafenib 400 mg bid (Day one-fourteen), oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 (Day one) and capecitabine 1700 mg/m2(Day one-seven) every two weeks. Response assessment was based on RECIST 1.0 criteria. The primary endpoint was time-to-progression (TTP) and the secondary endpoints were tumor response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and tolerability. Results: A total of 51 patients were enrolled in the trial.The median age was 58 years (range, 28-81) and 84% of patients were chronic hepatitis B carriers. Ninety percent of recruited patients belonged to BCLC stage C disease and 41 (80%) patients had extra-hepatic metastasis. The best RR was 16% and they were all partial response. Another 62% of patients achieved stable disease for at least eight weeks. The median TTP was 5.29 months (95% CI 3.81-5.88 months), PFS 5.26 months (95% CI 3.75-5.88 months) and OS was 11.73 months (95% CI 8.87- 15.38 months). Diarrhea (75%), Hand-foot-skin reaction (73%) and transient liver function derangement were the most commonly encountered adverse events, with the majority of patients having grade one or two. No treatment-related death was reported. Conclusions: The SECOX regime indicates preliminary promising activity and safety in Asian population with advanced HCC. Our data support a randomized trial comparing SECOX versus sorafenib alone for treatment of advanced HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT00752063.

Phase II study of intrabuccally-administered amplitude-modulated electromagnetic fields in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15573-e15573
Author(s):  
F. P. Costa ◽  
A. C. de Oliveira ◽  
R. Meirelles ◽  
M. M. Machado ◽  
R. Surjan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Electromagnetic Fields ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hepatic Function ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Independent Review

e15573 Background: Over the past few years we have identified tumor-specific frequencies for several common forms of cancer. The goal of this study was to assess the tolerability and effectiveness of electromagnetic fields amplitude-modulated at tumor-specific frequencies and administered by means of an intrabuccal spoon-shaped probe in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: From October 2005 to July 2007, patients with advanced HCC and Child-Pugh A or B were recruited in a phase II study. Three daily 60 min outpatient treatments were administered until disease progression or death. Imaging studies were performed every eight weeks. The primary efficacy end point was progression-free survival ≥ 6 months. Secondary efficacy end points were progression-free survival and overall survival. Results: A total of 41 patients were enrolled, 17 had Child-Pugh A, 20 Child-Pugh B disease. The median age was 64.0 years. Seventeen patients (34.1%) were progression-free for more than 6 months. Median progression-free and overall survivals were 4.8 months (95% CI 2.3–6.0) and 6.9 months (95 CI 4.8–11.1). As of December 2008, four patients are alive and two patients, who are still undergoing therapy, remain progression-free for 30.4 and 30.7 months, respectively. Four patients had partial response (9.8%) and sixteen had stable disease for at least 12 weeks (39.0%) according to the RECIST criteria resulting in 48.8% disease control. All responses were confirmed by independent review. There were no NCI grade 2, 3 or 4 toxicities. One patient developed grade 1 mucositis and one patient grade 1 fatigue. Conclusions: In patients with advanced HCC and impaired hepatic function, treatment with amplitude-modulated electromagnetic fields is safe, well tolerated, and shows evidence of anti-tumor effects, which are long-lasting in some patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Combination of capecitabine, oxaliplatin with bevacizumab in treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A phase II study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4574-4574 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Sun ◽  
D. G. Haller ◽  
K. Mykulowycz ◽  
M. Rosen ◽  
M. Soulen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Standard Chemotherapy Regimen ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Number Of Treatment

4574 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers globally and its incidence of in USA is increasing. Unfortunately, most patients with HCC are unsuitable for surgical resection or transplantation. Because of the heterogeneity of this disease and poor liver function in many patients, there is no generally accepted standard chemotherapy regimen for HCC. Efforts have been made to investigate effective and tolerable therapy for patients with advanced HCC. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of the combination of bevacizumab, oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with advanced or metastatic HCC. The primary goal of the study was to evaluate the progression-free survival rate. The secondary endpoints include response, overall survival and toxicity. Methods: Patients with advanced or unresectable untransplantable metastatic HCC who had adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function (ANC ≥ 1,500/mm3, platelets ≥ 75,000/mm3, serum creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dl, total bilirubin ≤ 3.0 mg/dl, transaminases ≤ 5 upper limit of normal, and INR ≤ 1.5) were eligible to the study. Bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) were administered intravenously day 1 of each 21- day cycle. Capecitabine (825 mg/m2, twice a day) was administered days 1 to 14. Results: Thirty patients (male/female ratio of 23/7) have been enrolled, with a median age of 57 (range 23–85). The average number of treatment cycles was 8 (2–25 cycles). Of evaluable patients, 3 patients (11%) achieved partial response, 21 patients had stable disease (78%) with a disease control rate of 89%. The mean PFS was 5.4 months with 3- and 6- months PFS of 70%, and 40%. There were 33% Gr. 2/3 oxaliplatin-related peripheral neuropathy and 11 % capecitabine-related Gr. 2/3 hand- foot syndrome. One patient had gastrointestinal perforation and sepsis after his first administration of bevacizumab and oxaliplatin. Two patients had esophageal varices-related bleeding, likely disease-related. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that the combination of bevacizumab, oxaliplatin and capecitabine is effective and tolerable in treatment of advanced HCC and should be considered for the further investigation. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Efficacy, Safety, and Potential Biomarkers of Sunitinib Monotherapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Phase II Study

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (18) ◽  
pp. 3027-3035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew X. Zhu ◽  
Dushyant V. Sahani ◽  
Dan G. Duda ◽  
Emmanuelle di Tomaso ◽  
Marek Ancukiewicz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Sunitinib Treatment

PurposeTo assess the safety and efficacy of sunitinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and explore biomarkers for sunitinib response.Patients and MethodsWe conducted a multidisciplinary phase II study of sunitinib, an antivascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in advanced HCC. Patients received sunitinib 37.5 mg/d for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest per cycle. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate vascular changes in HCC after sunitinib treatment. Circulating molecular and cellular biomarkers were evaluated before and at six time points after sunitinib treatment.ResultsThirty-four patients were enrolled. The objective response rate was 2.9%, and 50% of patients had stable disease. Median PFS was 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 6.9 months), and overall survival was 9.8 months (95% CI, 7.4 months to not available). Grade 3 or 4 toxicities included leukopenia/neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, elevation of aminotransferases, and fatigue. Sunitinib rapidly decreased vessel leakiness, and this effect was more pronounced in patients with delayed progression. When evaluated early (at baseline and day 14) as well as over three cycles of treatment, higher levels of inflammatory molecules (eg, interleukin-6, stromal-derived factor 1α, soluble c-KIT) and circulating progenitor cells were associated with a poor outcome.ConclusionSunitinib shows evidence of modest antitumor activity in advanced HCC with manageable adverse effects. Rapid changes in tumor vascular permeability and circulating inflammatory biomarkers are potential determinants of response and resistance to sunitinib in HCC. Our study suggests that control of inflammation might be critical for improving treatment outcome in advanced HCC.

A phase II study of sorafenib in combination with tegafur/uracil (UFT) for Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4589-4589
Author(s):  
Y. Shen ◽  
C. Hsu ◽  
C. Hsu ◽  
Z. Lin ◽  
P. Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Metronomic Chemotherapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Molar Ratio ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Multikinase Inhibitor ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Ecog Ps

4589 Background: Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic activity, has recently been approved for the treatment of unresectable HCC. Combination of sorafenib with metronomic chemotherapy has theoretic advantage in improving antitumor activity without increasing toxicities. UFT (tegafur: uracil = 4:1 in molar ratio), an oral fluoropyrimidine, is active in various gastrointestinal cancers. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sorafenib plus low-dose UFT in advanced HCC patients (pts). Methods: Pts with histologically or cytologically proven unresectable/metastatic HCC, ECOG PS 0–2, Child-Puch class A, platelets ≥ 100 K/μl, transaminases ≤ 5 × ULN, bilirubin ≤ 3 mg/dl, INR ≤ 2.3 and creatinine ≤ 1.5 × ULN were enrolled. Prior systemic therapy for advanced disease is not allowed. Sorafenib (400 mg bid) and UFT (125 mg/m2 based on tegafur bid) were taken per os continuously. Tumor assessment was performed q8w by RECIST criteria. Primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Between April 2007 and April 2008, 53 pts were enrolled. Baseline pts characteristics were: M/F, 47/6; median age 57 (range, 31–83); CLIP score 0–3/4, 48/5; extrahepatic spread/macroscopic vascular invasion, 33/30; and HBsAg(+)/anti-HCV(+)/both(+), 38/13/4. 89% of pts were BCLC stage C. Pts received a median of 3.7 (range 0.3- 18.9+) months of treatment. There were 3 (6%) PR and 27 (51%) SD. The median PFS and OS were of 3.7 months (95% C.I., 1.9- 5.5) and 7.4 months (95% C.I., 3.4- 11.4), respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were summarized in Table . Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), fatigue, and diarrhea were most common AEs. HFSR was the major AE resulting in dose reduction (19%) or treatment delay (21%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 2 pts (4%). Conclusions: Adding metronomic UFT chemotherapy to sorafenib may improve therapeutic efficacy of the latter in pts with advanced HCC. The toxicity profile of the combination is similar to that of sorafenib alone. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Clinical, pharmacodynamic (PD), and pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation of cediranib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A phase II study (CTEP 7147).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4112-4112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew X. Zhu ◽  
Marek Ancukiewicz ◽  
Jeffrey G. Supko ◽  
Lawrence Scott Blaszkowsky ◽  
Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Vegf Receptor ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Baseline Levels ◽  
Grade 3

4112 Background: Sorafenib remains the only approved systemic therapy in HCC. We performed a phase II study of cediranib (AZD2171)—a more potent and selective pan-VEGF receptor inhibitor—in advanced HCC patients (pts). Methods: Eligibility criteria included unresectable or metastatic measurable HCC, ECOG PS ≤2, CLIP score ≤3, and adequate organ function. Patients received cediranib at 30 mg po qd continuously (4-wk cycle). The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). We also assessed overall survival (OS) and response rates, steady-state PK of cediranib, and blood circulating biomarkers. Results: Since 6/16/09, we have enrolled the targeted 17 pts required for the first stage of the planned study: ECOG 0/1/2=5/11/1, CLIP 1/2/3=6/4/7, Child A/B=14/3, BCLC C=17. Nine pts had prior sorafenib. The best response was stable disease in five pts (29%). The median PFS was 5.3 months (95% CI: 3.5-9.7). The median OS was 11.7 months (95% CI: 7.5-13.6). Grade 3 toxicities included hypertension (29%), hyponatremia (12%), elevated SGOT (12%) and one pt each (6%) in SGPT, fatigue, hyperbilirubinemia, cardiac ischemia, and proteinuria. Grade 4 pulmonary embolism and brainstem hemorrhage occurred in 1 pt each. Steady-state PK parameters (mean±SD) were, Cmin, 22±21 ng/mL; Cmax, 55±33 ng/mL; AUCτ, 887±503 ng*h/mL. Plasma levels of VEGF and PlGF increased and sVEGFR1, sVEGFR2 and Ang-2 decreased significantly after cediranib treatment (p<0.05). PFS was inversely correlated with baseline levels of bFGF, sVEGFR2 and VEGF, and OS was inversely correlated with baseline levels of sVEGFR1, Ang-2, TNF-alpha and CD34+CD133+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (p<0.05). Conclusions: Cediranib at 30 mg daily is associated with high frequency of grade 3 hypertension and shows preliminary evidence of antitumor activity in advanced HCC pts. Exploratory studies confirmed potential PD and response biomarkers of anti-VEGF therapy. Cediranib exhibits similar PK in HCC pts as in those with other tumor types and normal/near normal hepatic function. This study was stopped by AstraZeneca after discontinuation of cediranib development for unrelated factors.

scholarly journals Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results of a Phase II Study

ISRN Oncology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Aly M. Azmy ◽  
Khalid E. Nasr ◽  
Nagy S. Gobran ◽  
M. Yassin
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Grade 3

Objectives. Assessment of gemcitabine/carboplatin combination in patients with advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a phase II trial for safety and efficacy. Methods. Forty patients with previously untreated advanced-stage HCC were prospectively enrolled and subjected to gemcitabine/carboplatin regimen which consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, and carboplatin AUC 6 on day 1. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks until disease progression or limiting toxicity. Results. Forty patients were assessable for efficacy and toxicity. In all, 276 treatment cycles were administered. No toxic deaths occurred. Hematological grade 3-4 toxicity consisted of thrombocytopenia (27% of patients) and neutropenia (24%), including 2 febrile neutropenia and anemia (9%). Grade 3 carboplatin-induced neurotoxicity was observed in 3 (9%) patients. ORR was 23% (95% CI, 0.10–0.29) with 9 partial responses and disease stabilization was observed in 46% (95% CI, 0.22–0.42) of patients, giving a disease control rate of 69%. Median progression-free and overall survival times were, respectively, 5 months (95% CI: 3–8 months) and 8 months (95% CI: 6–18 months). Conclusion. The gemcitabine/carboplatin regimen seems to be effective, well tolerated, and active in advanced HCC.

Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin in Combination With Bevacizumab in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 1898-1903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew X. Zhu ◽  
Lawrence S. Blaszkowsky ◽  
David P. Ryan ◽  
Jeffrey W. Clark ◽  
Alona Muzikansky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Vascular Tumor ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Transient Elevation

Purpose Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a vascular tumor with poor prognosis. Given the reported activity of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in HCC and the potential benefits of targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway with bevacizumab (B), a phase II study of GEMOX-B was undertaken to define efficacy and toxicity profiles in HCC patients. Patients and Methods Eligible patients had pathologically proven measurable unresectable or metastatic HCC. For cycle 1 (14 days), bevacizumab 10 mg/kg was administered alone intravenously on day 1. For cycle 2 and beyond (28 days/cycle), bevacizumab 10 mg/kg was administered on days 1 and 15, gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 was administered as a dose rate infusion at 10 mg/m2/min followed by oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m2 on days 2 and 16. Results Thirty-three patients were enrolled and 30 patients were assessable for efficacy. The objective response rate was 20%, and 27% of patients had stable disease. Median overall survival was 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.0 months to not available) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 8.7 months); the PFS rate at 3 and 6 months was 70% (95% CI, 54% to 85%) and 48% (95% CI, 31% to 65%), respectively. The most common treatment-related grade 3 to 4 toxicities included leukopenia/neutropenia, transient elevation of aminotransferases, hypertension, and fatigue. Conclusion GEMOX-B could be safely administered with close monitoring and had moderate antitumor activity for patients with advanced HCC. The high 6-month PFS rate is encouraging, and this regimen is worthy of further investigation.

Sorafenib-Regorafenib Sequential Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Institute Experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 611-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuomi Ueshima ◽  
Naoshi Nishida ◽  
Masatoshi Kudo
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Sequential Therapy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Grade 3

Objectives: Previously, no therapeutic agent has been known to improve the overall survival compared with placebo in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), who have progressed after sorafenib. In this patient population, regorafenib was first demonstrated to confer a survival benefit in the RESORCE trial, and subsequently it was approved as a second-line treatment for patients with advanced HCC. An open-label expanded access program (EAP) of regorafenib was implemented for compassionate use. We investigated the efficacy and safety of regorafenib based on our experience of the RESORCE trial and the EAP. Methods: Data from 5 patients from the RESORCE trial and 6 from the EAP were analyzed retrospectively. All patients had tolerated prior sorafenib and were progressing during sorafenib treatment. Results: The median progression-free survival was 9.2 months (95% CI 2.3-16.1). One patient achieved a partial response and 7 achieved stable disease. The objective response rate was 9.1%, and the disease control rate was 72.7%. No treatment-associated mortalities were observed. Grade 3 hypophosphatemia was observed in 2 patients, grade 2 anorexia was observed in 5 patients, and grade 3 neutropenia was observed in 2 patients. Grade 2 and grade 3 thrombocytopenia were observed in 2 and 3 patients, respectively. All treatment-related adverse events were improved by reduction or interruption of regorafenib. Five patients showed decreased serum albumin levels. Conclusion: Sorafenib and regorafenib sequential therapy presents a safe and effective treatment option for patients with advanced HCC.

scholarly journals Axitinib in combination with radiotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase I clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Lin Yang ◽  
Mau-Shin Chi ◽  
Hui-Ling Ko ◽  
Yi-Ying Huang ◽  
Su-Chen Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Normal Liver ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Outcome Analysis ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Hcc

Abstract Background To investigate maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of axitinib, a selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1–3 inhibitor, in combination with radiotherapy (RT) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods This phase I study followed the rule of traditional 3 + 3 design. Major eligibility included: (1) patients with advanced HCC unsuitable for surgery, radiofrequency ablation or transarterial chemoembolization, or who failed after prior local–regional treatment; (2) failure on sorafenib or no grant for sorafenib from health insurance system. Eligible patients with advanced HCC received axitinib for total 8 weeks during and after RT. Three cohorts with axitinib dose escalation were planned: 1 mg twice daily (level I), 2 mg twice daily (level II) and 3 mg twice daily (level III). The prescribed doses of RT ranged from 37.5 to 67.5 Gy in 15 fractions to liver tumor(s) and were determined based on an upper limit of mean liver dose of 18 Gy (intended isotoxic RT for normal liver). The primary endpoint was MTD of axitinib in combination with RT. The secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), RT in-field response rate, acute and late toxicities, overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Results Total nine eligible patients received axitinib dose levels of 1 mg twice daily (n = 3), 2 mg twice daily (n = 3) and 3 mg twice daily (n = 3). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) did not occur in the 3 cohorts; the MTD was defined as 3 mg twice daily in this study. ORR was 66.7%, including 3 complete responses and 3 partial responses, at 3 months after treatment initiation. With a median follow-up of 16.6 months, median OS was not reached, 1-year OS was 66.7%, and median PFS was 7.4 months. Conclusions Axitinib in combination with RT for advanced HCC was well tolerated with an axitinib MTD of 3 mg twice daily in this study. The outcome analysis should be interpreted with caution due to the small total cohort. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02814461), Registered June 27, 2016—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02814461

Phase II Trial of the Combination of Bevacizumab and Erlotinib in Patients Who Have Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 843-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie B. Thomas ◽  
Jeffrey S. Morris ◽  
Romil Chadha ◽  
Michiko Iwasaki ◽  
Harmeet Kaur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Advanced Hcc

Purpose The study objective was to determine the proportion of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with the combination of bevacizumab (B) and erlotinib (E) who were alive and progression free at 16 weeks (16-week progression-free survival [PFS16]) of continuous therapy. Secondary objectives included response rate, median PFS, survival, and toxicity. Patients and Methods Patients who had advanced HCC that was not amenable to surgical or regional therapies, up to one prior systemic treatment; Childs-Pugh score A or B liver function; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0, 1, or 2 received B 10 mg/kg every 14 days and E 150 mg orally daily, continuously, for 28-day cycles. Tumor response was evaluated every 2 cycles by using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Group criteria. A total of 40 patients were treated. Results The primary end point of PFS16 was 62.5%. Ten patients achieved a partial response for a confirmed overall response rate (intent-to-treat) of 25%. The median PFSevent was 39 weeks (95% CI, 26 to 45 weeks; 9.0 months), and the median overall survival was 68 weeks (95% CI, 48 to 78 weeks; 15.65 months). Grades 3 to 4 drug-related toxicity included fatigue (n = 8; 20%), hypertension (n = 6; 15%), diarrhea (n = 4; 10%) elevated transaminases (n = 4; 10%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (n = 5; 12.5%), wound infection (n = 2; 5%) thrombocytopenia (n = 1; 2.5%), and proteinuria, hyperbilirubinemia, back pain, hyperkalemia, and anorexia (n = 1 each). Conclusion The combination of B + E in patients who had advanced HCC showed significant, clinically meaningful antitumor activity. B + E warrant additional evaluation in randomized controlled trials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document